These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37493400)

  • 1. The Impact of Single-Dose Debriefing for Meaningful Learning Training on Debriefer Quality, Time, and Outcomes: Early Evidence to Inform Debriefing Training and Frequency.
    Bradley CS; Johnson BK; Woda A; Hansen J; Loomis A; Dreifuerst KT
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 44(6):E33-E38. PubMed ID: 37493400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing the Impact of an Asynchronous Online Training Program With Repeated Feedback.
    Woda A; Bradley CS; Johnson BK; Hansen J; Loomis A; Pena S; Singh M; Dreifuerst KT
    Nurse Educ; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 48(5):254-259. PubMed ID: 37000866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of interdisciplinary postsimulation debriefing: 360° evaluation.
    Hull L; Russ S; Ahmed M; Sevdalis N; Birnbach DJ
    BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn; 2017; 3(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 35515097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Student Performance During a Simulated Patient Encounter Has No Impact on Debriefer Adherence to PEARLS Debriefing Model.
    McNutt R; Tews M; Kleinheksel AJ
    Med Sci Educ; 2021 Jun; 31(3):1141-1148. PubMed ID: 34457957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frameworks and quality measures used for debriefing in team-based simulation: a systematic review.
    Endacott R; Gale T; O'Connor A; Dix S
    BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn; 2019; 5(2):61-72. PubMed ID: 35519834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Debriefing for Meaningful Learning: Implementing a Train-the-Trainer Program for Debriefers.
    Woda A; Hansen J; Thomas Dreifuerst K; Johnson BK; Loomis A; Nolan C; Bradley CS
    J Contin Educ Nurs; 2022 Jul; 53(7):321-327. PubMed ID: 35858149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Debriefing after simulation-based non-technical skill training in healthcare: a systematic review of effective practice.
    Garden AL; Le Fevre DM; Waddington HL; Weller JM
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2015 May; 43(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 25943601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nursing and paramedicine student and academic perceptions of the two phase debrief model: A thematic analysis.
    Colleen R; Shannon D; Patricia C; Penny H; Tracey S
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2021 Feb; 51():103001. PubMed ID: 33636486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams.
    Coggins A; Hong SS; Baliga K; Halamek LP
    Adv Simul (Lond); 2022 Mar; 7(1):7. PubMed ID: 35256014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 'The Diamond': a structure for simulation debrief.
    Jaye P; Thomas L; Reedy G
    Clin Teach; 2015 Jun; 12(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 26009951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive Load Theory for debriefing simulations: implications for faculty development.
    Fraser KL; Meguerdichian MJ; Haws JT; Grant VJ; Bajaj K; Cheng A
    Adv Simul (Lond); 2018; 3():28. PubMed ID: 30619626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DE-CODE: a coding scheme for assessing debriefing interactions.
    Seelandt JC; Grande B; Kriech S; Kolbe M
    BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn; 2018; 4(2):51-58. PubMed ID: 35515884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Debriefer cognitive load during Traditional Reflective Debriefing vs. Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice interdisciplinary team training.
    Wiltrakis S; Hwu R; Holmes S; Iyer S; Goodwin N; Mathai C; Gillespie S; Hebbar KB; Colman N
    Adv Simul (Lond); 2024 Jun; 9(1):23. PubMed ID: 38835053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does a Written Tool to Guide Structured Debriefing Improve Discourse? Implications for Interprofessional Team Simulation.
    Thompson R; Sullivan S; Campbell K; Osman I; Statz B; Jung HS
    J Surg Educ; 2018 Nov; 75(6):e240-e245. PubMed ID: 30093336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Debriefing for Meaningful Learning With Screen-Based Simulation.
    Dreifuerst KT; Bradley CS; Johnson BK
    Nurse Educ; 2021 Jul-Aug 01; 46(4):239-244. PubMed ID: 33093345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Debriefing strategies for interprofessional simulation-a qualitative study.
    Holmes C; Mellanby E
    Adv Simul (Lond); 2022 Jun; 7(1):18. PubMed ID: 35717254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Faculty Development Workshop to Enhance Debriefing Skills Among Novice Facilitators.
    Abulebda K; Srinivasan S; Maa T; Stormorken A; Chumpitazi CE
    Cureus; 2020 Feb; 12(2):e6942. PubMed ID: 32195066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulation debriefing: a perspective from emergency medical care students at three South African Higher Education Institutions.
    Makkink AW; Dreyer DJ
    Pan Afr Med J; 2021; 38():97. PubMed ID: 33889263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Training and evaluating simulation debriefers in low-resource settings: lessons learned from Bihar, India.
    Raney JH; Medvedev MM; Cohen SR; Spindler H; Ghosh R; Christmas A; Das A; Gore A; Mahapatra T; Walker D
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Jan; 20(1):9. PubMed ID: 31914989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of simulation debriefing methods with interprofessional learning.
    Brown DK; Wong AH; Ahmed RA
    J Interprof Care; 2018 Jul; 32(1):779-781. PubMed ID: 30024297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.