66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3749358)
1. [Effect of stimulus frequency on the latency of acoustically evoked brain stem potentials in children].
Ressler P
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1986 Jun; 38(6):345-9. PubMed ID: 3749358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory event-related potentials in mentally retarded subjects during active and passive oddball experiments.
Zurrón M; Díaz F
Biol Psychiatry; 1997 Jan; 41(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 9018391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic latency variation of the auditory evoked M100: from average to single-trial data.
Salajegheh A; Link A; Elster C; Burghoff M; Sander T; Trahms L; Poeppel D
Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 15325376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Cross correlation functions of acoustic evoked brain stem potentials].
Mann K; Meyer-Wahl JG
EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1986 Jun; 17(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 3091361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [State dependent modification of auditory brain stem potentials].
Maier R; Rebentisch E
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1984 Nov; 36(11):633-8. PubMed ID: 6522519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of attention on the auditory evoked potentials recorded from the vertex (ABR) and the promontory (CAP) of human listeners.
Kuk FK; Abbas PJ
Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 2739888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhancement of auditory-evoked potentials in musicians reflects an influence of expertise but not selective attention.
Baumann S; Meyer M; Jäncke L
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2238-49. PubMed ID: 18457513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of maximum length and Legendre sequences for the derivation of brain-stem auditory-evoked responses at rapid rates of stimulation.
Burkard R; Shi Y; Hecox KE
J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1656-64. PubMed ID: 2341669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The indication for brain stem evoked response and the effect of click rate and stimulus intensity on the latencies of the auditory evoked potentials (author's transl)].
Baschek V; Steinert W
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1980 Oct; 59(10):690-7. PubMed ID: 7453423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Brain stem auditory-evoked response of the nonanesthetized dog.
Marshall AE
Am J Vet Res; 1985 Apr; 46(4):966-73. PubMed ID: 4014849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3.
Goldstein A; Spencer KM; Donchin E
Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov; 39(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 12462506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The topography of the afferent and efferent flows in the mechanisms of auditory selective attention].
Shostak VI; Lytaev SA; Golubeva LV
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1994; 44(4-5):665-73. PubMed ID: 7810208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking.
Sasaki T; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Ogura M; Tominaga T; Kobayashi T
Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 15808969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Latency determination of the human auditory on- and off- potentials of the brainstem. Influence of stimulus envelope characteristics.
Brinkmann RD; Scherg M
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1979; (9):189-96. PubMed ID: 294683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Monitoring of auditory function in comatose patients in therapy with potentially ototoxic substances using acoustically evoked brain stem potentials].
Piek J; Lumenta CB; Bock WJ
Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed; 1985 Feb; 20(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 3993873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Electrophysiologic studies on the course of the adaptation phase following noise stress].
von Wedel H; Dum N; Walger M
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1985 Aug; 64(8):436-40. PubMed ID: 4046695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Brain-stem auditory-evoked responses elicited by maximum length sequences: effect of simultaneous masking noise.
Burkard R; Shi Y; Hecox KE
J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1665-72. PubMed ID: 2341670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Brain stem auditory-evoked responses in the dog.
Bodenhamer RD; Hunter JF; Luttgen PJ
Am J Vet Res; 1985 Aug; 46(8):1787-92. PubMed ID: 4037510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
