These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37496701)

  • 1. Can the evaluation of marker placement confidence be used as an indicator of gait kinematic variability?
    Fonseca M; Gasparutto X; Lena C; Grouvel G; Bonnefoy-Mazure A; Dumas R; Armand S
    Front Rehabil Sci; 2023; 4():1122303. PubMed ID: 37496701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of lower limb and pelvic marker placement precision among different evaluators and its impact on gait kinematics computed with the Conventional Gait Model.
    Fonseca M; Gasparutto X; Grouvel G; Bonnefoy-Mazure A; Dumas R; Armand S
    Gait Posture; 2023 Jul; 104():22-30. PubMed ID: 37307761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test-retest reliability and inter-tester reliability of kinematic data from a three-dimensional gait analysis system.
    Tsushima H; Morris ME; McGinley J
    J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc; 2003; 6(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 25792928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of knee marker misplacement on gait kinematics of children with cerebral palsy using the Conventional Gait Model-A sensitivity study.
    Fonseca M; Gasparutto X; Leboeuf F; Dumas R; Armand S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232064. PubMed ID: 32330162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of real-time feedback to improve kinematic marker placement consistency among novice examiners.
    Macaulay CAJ; Osis ST; Clermont C; Ferber R
    Gait Posture; 2017 Oct; 58():440-445. PubMed ID: 28910657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of toe marker placement error on joint kinematics and muscle forces using OpenSim gait simulation.
    Xu H; Merryweather A; Bloswick D; Mao Q; Wang T
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S685-91. PubMed ID: 26406064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability testing of the heel marker in three-dimensional gait analysis.
    McCahill J; Schallig W; Stebbins J; Prescott R; Theologis T; Harlaar J
    Gait Posture; 2021 Mar; 85():84-87. PubMed ID: 33517041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Kinematics and temporospatial parameters during gait from inertial motion capture in adults with and without HIV: a validity and reliability study.
    Berner K; Cockcroft J; Louw Q
    Biomed Eng Online; 2020 Jul; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 32709239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can the reliability of three-dimensional running kinematics be improved using functional joint methodology?
    Pohl MB; Lloyd C; Ferber R
    Gait Posture; 2010 Oct; 32(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 20732816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of knee marker placement error on evaluation of gait kinematic parameters.
    Szczerbik E; Kalinowska M
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2011; 13(3):43-6. PubMed ID: 22098124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of three-dimensional multi-segmental foot models used in clinical gait laboratories.
    Nicholson K; Church C; Takata C; Niiler T; Chen BP; Lennon N; Sees JP; Henley J; Miller F
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():236-241. PubMed ID: 29778063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of walking and stair climbing kinematics in a young obese population using a standard kinematic and the CGM2 model.
    Horsak B; Schwab C; Leboeuf F; Kranzl A
    Gait Posture; 2021 Jan; 83():96-99. PubMed ID: 33129173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applications of markerless motion capture in gait recognition.
    Sandau M
    Dan Med J; 2016 Mar; 63(3):. PubMed ID: 26931198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity of the OLGA and VCM models to erroneous marker placement: effects on 3D-gait kinematics.
    Groen BE; Geurts M; Nienhuis B; Duysens J
    Gait Posture; 2012 Mar; 35(3):517-21. PubMed ID: 22245226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does tester experience influence the reliability with which 3D gait kinematics are collected in healthy adults?
    Leigh RJ; Pohl MB; Ferber R
    Phys Ther Sport; 2014 May; 15(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 23988839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and sources of variability of 3D kinematics and electromyography measurements to assess newly-acquired gait in toddlers with typical development and unilateral cerebral palsy.
    Grigoriu AI; Brochard S; Sangeux M; Padure L; Lempereur M
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2021 Jun; 58():102544. PubMed ID: 33761385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of three-dimensional kinematic gait data in adults with spinal cord injury.
    Wedege P; Steffen K; Strøm V; Opheim AI
    J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng; 2017; 4():2055668317729992. PubMed ID: 31186937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of Simulated Marker Placement Deviations on Running Kinematics and Evaluation of a Morphometric-Based Placement Feedback Method.
    Osis ST; Hettinga BA; Macdonald S; Ferber R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147111. PubMed ID: 26765846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modified conventional gait model versus cluster tracking: Test-retest reliability, agreement and impact of inverse kinematics with joint constraints on kinematic and kinetic data.
    Mentiplay BF; Clark RA
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():75-83. PubMed ID: 29879631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Within-assessor reliability and minimal detectable change of gait kinematics in a young obese demographic.
    Horsak B; Pobatschnig B; Baca A; Greber-Platzer S; Kreissl A; Nehrer S; Wondrasch B; Crevenna R; Keilani M; Kranzl A
    Gait Posture; 2017 May; 54():112-118. PubMed ID: 28288331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.