These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37497670)
21. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of water samples as a tool for monitoring Iberian freshwater fish composition. Corral-Lou A; Doadrio I PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0283088. PubMed ID: 37903086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. eDNA metabarcoding of avocado flowers: 'Hass' it got potential to survey arthropods in food production systems? Kestel JH; Bateman PW; Field DL; White NE; Lines R; Nevill P Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Oct; 23(7):1540-1555. PubMed ID: 37237427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Environmental DNA metabarcoding as a useful tool for evaluating terrestrial mammal diversity in tropical forests. Mena JL; Yagui H; Tejeda V; Bonifaz E; Bellemain E; Valentini A; Tobler MW; Sánchez-Vendizú P; Lyet A Ecol Appl; 2021 Jul; 31(5):e02335. PubMed ID: 33780592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost-effort analysis of Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUV) and environmental DNA (eDNA) in monitoring marine ecological communities. Clark AJ; Atkinson SR; Scarponi V; Cane T; Geraldi NR; Hendy IW; Shipway JR; Peck M PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17091. PubMed ID: 38708339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Spider webs as eDNA samplers: Biodiversity assessment across the tree of life. Gregorič M; Kutnjak D; Bačnik K; Gostinčar C; Pecman A; Ravnikar M; Kuntner M Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Oct; 22(7):2534-2545. PubMed ID: 35510791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool for monitoring fish diversity in a coastal wetland of the Pearl River Estuary compared to bottom trawling. Zou K; Chen J; Ruan H; Li Z; Guo W; Li M; Liu L Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():134704. PubMed ID: 31726353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sampling environmental DNA from trees and soil to detect cryptic arboreal mammals. Allen MC; Kwait R; Vastano A; Kisurin A; Zoccolo I; Jaffe BD; Angle JC; Maslo B; Lockwood JL Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):180. PubMed ID: 36604526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of eDNA to camera trapping for assessment of terrestrial mammal diversity. Leempoel K; Hebert T; Hadly EA Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Jan; 287(1918):20192353. PubMed ID: 31937227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods. Pawlowski J; Bruce K; Panksep K; Aguirre FI; Amalfitano S; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Baussant T; Bouchez A; Carugati L; Cermakova K; Cordier T; Corinaldesi C; Costa FO; Danovaro R; Dell'Anno A; Duarte S; Eisendle U; Ferrari BJD; Frontalini F; Frühe L; Haegerbaeumer A; Kisand V; Krolicka A; Lanzén A; Leese F; Lejzerowicz F; Lyautey E; Maček I; Sagova-Marečková M; Pearman JK; Pochon X; Stoeck T; Vivien R; Weigand A; Fazi S Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 818():151783. PubMed ID: 34801504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Advances in environmental DNA monitoring: standardization, automation, and emerging technologies in aquatic ecosystems. Lu S; Zeng H; Xiong F; Yao M; He S Sci China Life Sci; 2024 Jul; 67(7):1368-1384. PubMed ID: 38512561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biodiversity and spatial distribution of ascidian using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Bae S; Kim P; Yi CH Mar Environ Res; 2023 Mar; 185():105893. PubMed ID: 36689844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Valentini A; Taberlet P; Miaud C; Civade R; Herder J; Thomsen PF; Bellemain E; Besnard A; Coissac E; Boyer F; Gaboriaud C; Jean P; Poulet N; Roset N; Copp GH; Geniez P; Pont D; Argillier C; Baudoin JM; Peroux T; Crivelli AJ; Olivier A; Acqueberge M; Le Brun M; Møller PR; Willerslev E; Dejean T Mol Ecol; 2016 Feb; 25(4):929-42. PubMed ID: 26479867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Environmental DNA persistence and fish detection in captive sponges. Cai W; Harper LR; Neave EF; Shum P; Craggs J; Arias MB; Riesgo A; Mariani S Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Nov; 22(8):2956-2966. PubMed ID: 35751617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Identifying error and accurately interpreting environmental DNA metabarcoding results: A case study to detect vertebrates at arid zone waterholes. Furlan EM; Davis J; Duncan RP Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Sep; 20(5):1259-1276. PubMed ID: 32310337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. New deep learning-based methods for visualizing ecosystem properties using environmental DNA metabarcoding data. Lamperti L; Sanchez T; Si Moussi S; Mouillot D; Albouy C; Flück B; Bruno M; Valentini A; Pellissier L; Manel S Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Nov; 23(8):1946-1958. PubMed ID: 37702270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. eDNA in subterranean ecosystems: Applications, technical aspects, and future prospects. Saccò M; Guzik MT; van der Heyde M; Nevill P; Cooper SJB; Austin AD; Coates PJ; Allentoft ME; White NE Sci Total Environ; 2022 May; 820():153223. PubMed ID: 35063529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Plant-derived environmental DNA complements diversity estimates from traditional arthropod monitoring methods but outperforms them detecting plant-arthropod interactions. Weber S; Stothut M; Mahla L; Kripp A; Hirschler L; Lenz N; Junker A; Künzel S; Krehenwinkel H Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Feb; 24(2):e13900. PubMed ID: 38010630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fishing for fish environmental DNA: Ecological applications, methodological considerations, surveying designs, and ways forward. Yao M; Zhang S; Lu Q; Chen X; Zhang SY; Kong Y; Zhao J Mol Ecol; 2022 Oct; 31(20):5132-5164. PubMed ID: 35972241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]