These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37498704)

  • 21. Control processes in voluntary and explicitly cued task switching.
    Masson ME; Carruthers S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1944-58. PubMed ID: 24443883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differential contribution of task conflicts to task switch cost and task mixing cost in alternating runs and cued task-switching: evidence from ex-Gaussian modeling of reaction time distributions.
    Shahar N; Meiran N
    Psychol Res; 2015 Mar; 79(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 24760460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exploring task switch costs in a color-shape decision task via a mouse tracking paradigm.
    Ye W; Damian MF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Jan; 48(1):8-20. PubMed ID: 34843342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Task practice differentially modulates task-switching performance across the adult lifespan.
    Whitson LR; Karayanidis F; Michie PT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):124-36. PubMed ID: 22000521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: tasks or cues?
    Mayr U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):794-9. PubMed ID: 17328375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Account of the Effect of Switch Probability on Switch and Mixing Costs: An ERP Study in a Cued Task-switching Paradigm.
    Wenwen C; Yang Y; Cui L; Chen Y; Zhang W; Zhang X; Zhou S
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2022 Dec; 35(4):230-246. PubMed ID: 36136039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is task switching nothing but cue priming? Evidence from ERPs.
    Jost K; Mayr U; Rösler F
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 8(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 18405048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 16724782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A new account of the effect of probability on task switching: ERP evidence following the manipulation of switch probability, cue informativeness and predictability.
    Nessler D; Friedman D; Johnson R
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Oct; 91(2):245-62. PubMed ID: 22820040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of response requirements in task switching: dissolving the residue.
    Wylie GR; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    Neuroreport; 2004 Apr; 15(6):1079-87. PubMed ID: 15076739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of foreknowledge and task-set shifting as mirrored in cue- and target-locked event-related potentials.
    Finke M; Escera C; Barceló F
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49486. PubMed ID: 23152912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dissociating the components of switch cost using two-to-two cue-task mapping.
    Hydock C; Sohn MH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):903-13. PubMed ID: 21463080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?
    Arrington CM; Logan GD; Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):484-502. PubMed ID: 17470002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Task-switching costs disappear if non-Chinese participants respond to Chinese characters.
    Li X; Li B; Liu X; Lages M; Stoet G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2051-2071. PubMed ID: 30730179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Event-related potential correlates of task switching and switch costs.
    Kieffaber PD; Hetrick WP
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Jan; 42(1):56-71. PubMed ID: 15720581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electrophysiological correlates of the cognitive control processes underpinning mixing and switching costs.
    Tarantino V; Mazzonetto I; Vallesi A
    Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 1646():160-173. PubMed ID: 27238463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Electrophysiological correlates of residual switch costs.
    Gajewski PD; Kleinsorge T; Falkenstein M
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1138-48. PubMed ID: 19717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Phasic alertness and residual switch costs in task switching.
    Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):317-327. PubMed ID: 27831719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.