These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37499738)

  • 1. High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement or composite resin for restorations in posterior permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analyses.
    Cribari L; Madeira L; Roeder RBR; Macedo RM; Wambier LM; Porto TS; Gonzaga CC; Kaizer MR
    J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104629. PubMed ID: 37499738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dias AGA; Magno MB; Delbem ACB; Cunha RF; Maia LC; Pessan JP
    J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():1-13. PubMed ID: 29649506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.
    Dorri M; Martinez-Zapata MJ; Walsh T; Marinho VC; Sheiham Deceased A; Zaror C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD008072. PubMed ID: 29284075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The preventive effect of glass ionomer cement restorations on secondary caries formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ge KX; Quock R; Chu CH; Yu OY
    Dent Mater; 2023 Dec; 39(12):e1-e17. PubMed ID: 37838608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The preventive effect of glass ionomer restorations on new caries formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ge KX; Quock R; Chu CH; Yu OY
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104272. PubMed ID: 36038075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glass-ionomer restorations - An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters.
    Heintze SD; Loguercio AD; Hanzen TA; Reis A; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2022 May; 38(5):e109-e135. PubMed ID: 35221127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of ART and conventional techniques on clinical performance of glass-ionomer cement restorations in load bearing areas of permanent and primary dentitions: A systematic review.
    Ruengrungsom C; Palamara JEA; Burrow MF
    J Dent; 2018 Nov; 78():1-21. PubMed ID: 30017937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glass ionomer or composite resin for primary molars.
    Jones G; Taylor G
    Evid Based Dent; 2018 Oct; 19(3):86-87. PubMed ID: 30361668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on minimally invasive occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a two-year randomised split-mouth study.
    Hatirli H; Yasa B; Çelik EU
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Sep; 25(9):5493-5503. PubMed ID: 33683465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a systematic review.
    Amend S; Boutsiouki C; Bekes K; Kloukos D; Lygidakis NN; Frankenberger R; Krämer N
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2022 Oct; 23(5):727-759. PubMed ID: 35819627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
    Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-year clinical evaluation of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorations in non-carious cervical lesions: a randomised controlled split-mouth clinical trial.
    Celik EU; Tunac AT; Yilmaz F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Mar; 23(3):1473-1480. PubMed ID: 30120605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth.
    Worthington HV; Khangura S; Seal K; Mierzwinski-Urban M; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z; Rasines Alcaraz MG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Aug; 8(8):CD005620. PubMed ID: 34387873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating Glass Ionomer Cement Longevity in the Primary and Permanent Teeth-An Umbrella Review.
    Panetta A; Lopes P; Novaes TF; Rio R; Fernandes GVO; Mello-Moura ACV
    J Funct Biomater; 2024 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 38391901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Five-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorative systems in small class II restorations.
    Wafaie RA; Ibrahim Ali A; El-Negoly SAE; Mahmoud SH
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Apr; 35(3):538-555. PubMed ID: 36564970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical efficacy of bioactive restorative materials in controlling secondary caries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Pinto NS; Jorge GR; Vasconcelos J; Probst LF; De-Carli AD; Freire A
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):394. PubMed ID: 37322456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longevity of direct and indirect resin composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    da Veiga AM; Cunha AC; Ferreira DM; da Silva Fidalgo TK; Chianca TK; Reis KR; Maia LC
    J Dent; 2016 Nov; 54():1-12. PubMed ID: 27523636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term clinical performance of heat-cured high-viscosity glass ionomer class II restorations versus resin-based composites in primary molars: a randomized comparison trial.
    Kupietzky A; Atia Joachim D; Tal E; Moskovitz M
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2019 Oct; 20(5):451-456. PubMed ID: 30820833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Evaluation of Microhybrid Composite and Glass lonomer Restorative Material in Permanent Teeth.
    Kharma K; Zogheib T; Bhandi S; Mehanna C
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Feb; 19(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 29422475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.