BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37500342)

  • 21. Occlusal change in posterior implant-supported single crowns and its association with peri-implant bone level: a 5-year prospective study.
    Ding Q; Luo Q; Tian Y; Zhang L; Xie Q; Zhou Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 May; 26(5):4217-4227. PubMed ID: 35129663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of influence of occlusal surface height on stress distribution around posterior implant-supported single crown].
    Zhao X; Zhang L; Sun J; Yang ZY; Xie QF
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Feb; 48(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 26885916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Occlusion of artificial teeth in complete dentures: population-based analysis.
    Kordaß B; Quooß A; John D; Ruge S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29610776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distribution of occlusal forces during occlusal adjustment of dental implant prostheses: a nonlinear finite element analysis considering the capacity for displacement of opposing teeth and implants.
    Kasai K; Takayama Y; Yokoyama A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 22442771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Significance of mandibular molar replacement with a dental implant: a theoretical study with nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Yoshitani M; Takayama Y; Yokoyama A
    Int J Implant Dent; 2018 Feb; 4(1):4. PubMed ID: 29484524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biomechanical analysis for total mesialization of the maxillary dentition: A finite element study.
    Kawamura J; Park JH; Kojima Y; Tamaya N; Kook YA; Kyung HM; Chae JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jun; 159(6):790-798. PubMed ID: 33736907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Occlusion variation of posterior implant-supported single crown: a prospective 4-year follow-up study].
    Ding Q; Luo Q; Li XL; Zhang L; Xie QF
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Mar; 56(3):244-250. PubMed ID: 33663153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Influence of occlusal contacts of implant on adjacent teeth and antagonists displacements].
    Morikawa O
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Dec; 70(4):224-33. PubMed ID: 14733125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Strain gauge analysis of occlusal forces on implant prostheses at various occlusal heights.
    Cho YE; Park EJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Park JM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1034-41. PubMed ID: 25216126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Occlusal contact and clearance of posterior implant-supported single crowns designed by two different methods: a self-controlled study.
    He M; Pu T; Ding Q; Sun Y; Wang P; Sun Y; Zhang L
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):151. PubMed ID: 36918877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [New estimation method for displacement characteristic of teeth with occlusal force records].
    Ozawa K; Sato Y; Kitagawa N; Uchida K; Sugawara T
    Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Apr; 52(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 18467780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Change in masticatory ability with the implant restoration of second molars.
    Nam DH; Lee DW; Chung CJ; Kim KH; Park KH; Moon IS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Apr; 111(4):286-92. PubMed ID: 24331850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Influence of intraoral scan and dental cast scan on occlusal quantitative analysis of virtual dental model].
    Cheng MX; Jiang T; Sun YC; Zhang HY
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Feb; 50(1):136-140. PubMed ID: 29483736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Post-insertion Posterior Single-implant Occlusion Changes at Different Intervals: A T-Scan Computerized Occlusal Analysis.
    Madani AS; Nakhaei M; Alami M; Haghi HR; Moazzami SM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Oct; 18(10):927-932. PubMed ID: 28989132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Furcation depth and interroot separation dimensions for 5 different tooth types.
    Ward C; Greenwell H; Wittwer JW; Drisko C
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1999 Jun; 19(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 10635171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digitally designed occlusion of an implant-supported crown considering physiological tooth displacement under occlusal loading.
    Wu Z; Tu Y; Wang S; Ding Q; Zhang L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37891040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Influence of occlusal contacts on tooth displacement for mesio-distal direction].
    Tokuda A
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Mar; 71(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 15103956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Immediate loading at single crowns and 2-unit bridges supported by implants installed in a healed alveolar bony ridge or immediately after tooth extraction. An experimental study in dogs.
    Viganò P; Lang NP; Cesaretti G; Bengazi F; Omori Y; Botticelli D
    J Oral Rehabil; 2018 Dec; 45(12):974-982. PubMed ID: 30074633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.