165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37501171)
1. Decision-making on colorectal cancer screening in Curaçao - interviews with the target population.
Blake SN; Hugtenburg JG; van der Vlugt M; Dekker E; Fransen MP
BMC Public Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):1437. PubMed ID: 37501171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health literacy skills for informed decision making in colorectal cancer screening: Perceptions of screening invitees and experts.
Woudstra AJ; Timmermans DRM; Uiters E; Dekker E; Smets EMA; Fransen MP
Health Expect; 2018 Jun; 21(3):636-646. PubMed ID: 29266661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do people with a different goal-orientation or specific focus make different decisions about colorectal cancer-screening participation?
Douma LN; Uiters E; Timmermans DRM
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0213003. PubMed ID: 30817788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decision-making styles in the context of colorectal cancer screening.
Douma LN; Uiters E; Timmermans DRM
BMC Psychol; 2020 Feb; 8(1):11. PubMed ID: 32014059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Communication about colorectal cancer screening in Britain: public preferences for an expert recommendation.
Waller J; Macedo A; von Wagner C; Simon AE; Jones C; Hammersley V; Weller D; Wardle J; Campbell C
Br J Cancer; 2012 Dec; 107(12):1938-43. PubMed ID: 23175148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Autonomous and informed decision-making: The case of colorectal cancer screening.
Douma LN; Uiters E; Verweij MF; Timmermans DRM
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233308. PubMed ID: 32469889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accessibility of standardized information of a national colorectal cancer screening program for low health literate screening invitees: A mixed method study.
Fransen MP; Dekker E; Timmermans DRM; Uiters E; Essink-Bot ML
Patient Educ Couns; 2017 Feb; 100(2):327-336. PubMed ID: 27613567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient preferences on general health and colorectal cancer screening decision-making: Results from a national survey.
Zhu X; Weiser E; Jacobson DJ; Griffin JM; Limburg PJ; Finney Rutten LJ
Patient Educ Couns; 2022 Apr; 105(4):1034-1040. PubMed ID: 34340846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed decision-making and colorectal cancer screening: is it occurring in primary care?
Ling BS; Trauth JM; Fine MJ; Mor MK; Resnick A; Braddock CH; Bereknyei S; Weissfeld JL; Schoen RE; Ricci EM; Whittle J
Med Care; 2008 Sep; 46(9 Suppl 1):S23-9. PubMed ID: 18725829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health literacy and informed decision making regarding colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.
van der Heide I; Uiters E; Jantine Schuit A; Rademakers J; Fransen M
Eur J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 25(4):575-82. PubMed ID: 25733553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decision-making about participation in colorectal cancer screening in Sweden: Autonomous, value-dependent but uninformed?
Wangmar J; Wengström Y; Jervaeus A; Hultcrantz R; Fritzell K
Patient Educ Couns; 2021 Apr; 104(4):919-926. PubMed ID: 32980202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benefit-Harm Analysis for Informed Decision Making on Participating in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Modeling Study.
Yebyo HG; van Wifferen F; Pluymen LPM; Leeflang MMG; Dekker E; Coupé VMH; Puhan MA; Greuter MJE; Stegeman I
Value Health; 2024 Apr; 27(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 38141815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and practices preferences for decision making.
Messina CR; Lane DS; Grimson R
Am J Prev Med; 2005 Jun; 28(5):439-46. PubMed ID: 15894147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic.
Kroupa R; Ondrackova M; Kovalcikova P; Dastych M; Pavlik T; Kunovsky L; Dolina J
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Mar; 25(9):1132-1141. PubMed ID: 30863000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient-provider discussions about colorectal cancer screening: who initiates elements of informed decision making?
Katz ML; Broder-Oldach B; Fisher JL; King J; Eubanks K; Fleming K; Paskett ED
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Sep; 27(9):1135-41. PubMed ID: 22476985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concerns, perceived need and competing priorities: a qualitative exploration of decision-making and non-participation in a population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme to prevent colorectal cancer.
Hall N; Birt L; Rees CJ; Walter FM; Elliot S; Ritchie M; Weller D; Rubin G
BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e012304. PubMed ID: 27836872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding colorectal cancer screening among ethnic minority groups in the Netherlands - a qualitative study.
Woudstra AJ; Dekker E; Essink-Bot ML; Suurmond J
Health Expect; 2016 Dec; 19(6):1312-1323. PubMed ID: 26576015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?
van Dam L; Korfage IJ; Kuipers EJ; Hol L; van Roon AH; Reijerink JC; van Ballegooijen M; van Leerdam ME
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Jul; 49(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 23571149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Designing an Effective Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Egypt: A Qualitative Study of Perceptions of Egyptian Primary Care Physicians and Specialists.
Brand Bateman L; Khamess S; Abdelmoneim SE; Arafat W; Fouad MN; Khamis Y; Omar A; Abdelmoneim RS; Scarinci I
Oncologist; 2020 Oct; 25(10):e1525-e1531. PubMed ID: 32091658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How narratives influence colorectal cancer screening decision making and uptake: A realist review.
Woudstra AJ; Suurmond J
Health Expect; 2019 Jun; 22(3):327-337. PubMed ID: 31025444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
