These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37501323)

  • 1. Reply.
    Ezeh N; Sirek G; Ulysse SN; Feldman CH; Ramsey-Goldman R
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2023 Dec; 75(12):2538-2539. PubMed ID: 37501323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reply networks on a bulletin board system.
    Zhongbao K; Changshui Z
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2003 Mar; 67(3 Pt 2):036117. PubMed ID: 12689142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Female reply strategies in a duetting Australian bushcricket, Caedicia sp. (Phaneropterinae: Tettigoniidae: Orthoptera).
    Bailey WJ; Hammond TJ
    J Exp Biol; 2004 Feb; 207(Pt 5):803-11. PubMed ID: 14747412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Timing of Female Vibrational Reply on Male Signalling and Searching Behaviour in the Leafhopper Aphrodes makarovi.
    Kuhelj A; de Groot M; Blejec A; Virant-Doberlet M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139020. PubMed ID: 26488472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reply letter utilization by secondary level specialists in a municipality in Brazil: a qualitative study.
    Harris M; Ferreira A; Morães I; de Andrade F; de Souza D
    Rev Panam Salud Publica; 2007; 21(2-3):96-110. PubMed ID: 17565797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Training specialists to write appropriate reply letters to general practitioners about patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms; A cluster-randomized trial.
    Weiland A; Blankenstein AH; Willems MH; Van Saase JL; Van Daele PL; Van der Molen HT; Langbroek GB; Bootsma A; Vriens EM; Oberndorff-Klein Woolthuis A; Vernhout RM; Arends LR
    Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Oct; 98(10):1229-35. PubMed ID: 26206385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality and general practitioner satisfaction with reply letters for dementia patients.
    Kada S; Nygaard HA; Kada R; Laura T; Billsback U; Geitung JT
    Qual Prim Care; 2008; 16(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 18700097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is a low dose? Response to "Reply to 'The RBE of low-LET radiations' " Reply to the Response to "Reply to 'The RBE of low-LET radiations' " Comment on 'Updated estimates of the proportion of childhood leukaemia incidence in Great Britain that may be caused by natural background ionising radiation' Reply to "Comment on 'Updated estimates of the proportion of childhood leukaemia incidence in Great Britain that may be caused by natural background ionising radiation' ".
    Smith GM
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Mar; 30(1):93-101; author reply 99-101. PubMed ID: 20234069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emoji can facilitate recognition of conveyed indirect meaning.
    Holtgraves T; Robinson C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232361. PubMed ID: 32353045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reply to Sayeed et al's Reply to Reply.
    Carragee EJ; Andersson GBJ; Belcourt RM; Eskay-Auerbach M; Goertz M; Haldeman S; Hegmann KT; Lessenger JE; Mayer T; Mueller KL; Murphy DR; Tellin WG; Thiese MS; Travis R; Weiss MS; Harris JS
    J Occup Environ Med; 2022 Jun; 64(6):e391-e392. PubMed ID: 35761429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving clinical handover: Development of a web-based intensive care unit consultation system with structured reply generation.
    Ho JK
    BMJ Qual Improv Rep; 2016; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 27158498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Copredication and Complexity Revisited: Reply to Murphy's Reply.
    Michel C; Löhr G
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Feb; 47(2):e13249. PubMed ID: 36739519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study.
    Wakabayashi C; Hayashi K; Nagai K; Sakamoto N; Iwasaki Y
    BMJ Open; 2012; 2(5):. PubMed ID: 22952162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reviewers' Responses to Medical Research Articles.
    Sohail S; Akhtar J
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2019 Jan; 29(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 30630565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Audit of consultant physicians' reply letters for referrals to clinics in a tertiary teaching hospital.
    Scott IA; Mitchell CA; Logan E
    Intern Med J; 2004; 34(1-2):31-7. PubMed ID: 14748911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Food allergy order in 16 pairs of brothers and 4 families].
    De Luca L; Chiummariello S
    Pediatr Med Chir; 1994; 16(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 8029090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Best Reply Player Against Mixed Evolutionarily Stable Strategy User.
    Garay J; Móri TF
    Bull Math Biol; 2021 Dec; 84(1):23. PubMed ID: 34951688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects on response rates and costs of stamps vs business reply in a mail survey of physicians.
    Urban N; Anderson GL; Tseng A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 May; 46(5):455-9. PubMed ID: 8501471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adolescents' reply intent for sexual disclosure in cyberspace: gender differences and effects of anonymity and topic intimacy.
    Chiou WB
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2007 Oct; 10(5):725-8. PubMed ID: 17927545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correspondence (reply): In Reply.
    Ukena D
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2008 Nov; 105(48):842. PubMed ID: 19578422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.