148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37505353)
1. Does Preoperative MRI Reduce Positive Margins after Breast-Conserving Surgery?
Cairns A; Chagpar AB; Dupont E; Levine EA; Gass JS; Chiba A; Ollila DW; Howard-McNatt M;
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Oct; 30(10):6053-6058. PubMed ID: 37505353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative breast MRI features associated with positive or close margins in breast-conserving surgery.
Bae MS; Bernard-Davila B; Sung JS; Morris EA
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Aug; 117():171-177. PubMed ID: 31307644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Associated with Positive Resection Margins in Patients with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.
Yoon J; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Park VY
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 21(8):946-954. PubMed ID: 32677379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI can reduce the rate of tumor-positive resection margins after breast conserving surgery in patients with early non-mass breast carcinoma].
Li XS; Song YL; Li DC; Zhu HX; Meng LM; Huang RR; Wang SL; Wang D; Fang H; Fan HX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 39(10):768-774. PubMed ID: 29061022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI predictors of tumor-positive margins after breast-conserving surgery.
Bahl M; Baker JA; Kinsey EN; Ghate SV
Clin Imaging; 2019; 57():45-49. PubMed ID: 31128385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. External validation and modification of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins before breast conserving surgery.
Jung JJ; Kang E; Kim EK; Kim SM; Jang M; La Yun B; Park SY; Shin HC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Sep; 183(2):373-380. PubMed ID: 32647937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Impact of Preoperative Breast MRI on Surgical Margin Status in Breast Cancer Patients Recalled at Biennial Screening Mammography: An Observational Cohort Study.
Gommers JJJ; Duijm LEM; Bult P; Strobbe LJA; Kuipers TP; Hooijen MJH; Mann RM; Voogd AC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Oct; 28(11):5929-5938. PubMed ID: 33796997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effect of Lumpectomy and Cavity Shave Margin Status on Recurrence and Survival in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Abdelsattar JM; Afridi FG; Dai Z; Yousaf N; Seldomridge A; Battin AO; Wen S; Gray D; Marsh JW; Cowher MS; Partin JF; Hazard-Jenkins H; Lupinacci K
Am Surg; 2023 Mar; 89(3):424-433. PubMed ID: 34196595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.
Chagpar AB; Killelea BK; Tsangaris TN; Butler M; Stavris K; Li F; Yao X; Bossuyt V; Harigopal M; Lannin DR; Pusztai L; Horowitz NR
N Engl J Med; 2015 Aug; 373(6):503-10. PubMed ID: 26028131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Should breast density influence patient selection for breast-conserving surgery?
Kapoor NS; Eaton A; King TA; Patil S; Stempel M; Morris E; Brogi E; Morrow M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Feb; 20(2):600-6. PubMed ID: 22941162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.
van Deurzen CH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of margin assessment method on positive margin rate and total volume excised.
Moo TA; Choi L; Culpepper C; Olcese C; Heerdt A; Sclafani L; King TA; Reiner AS; Patil S; Brogi E; Morrow M; Van Zee KJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 24046114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of age and extensive intraductal component histology upon breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor.
Wazer DE; Schmidt-Ullrich RK; Ruthazer R; DiPetrillo T; Boyle T; Kanski J; Safaii H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Nov; 45(4):885-91. PubMed ID: 10571194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhancing patterns of breast cancer on preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and resection margin in breast conserving therapy.
Kim OH; Kim SJ; Lee JS
Breast Dis; 2016 Feb; 36(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 27177341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Associated with Positive Resection Margins in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
Kang JH; Youk JH; Kim JA; Gweon HM; Eun NL; Ko KH; Son EJ
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(5):897-904. PubMed ID: 30174479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscope for intraoperative margin assessment - POLARHIS study.
Sandor MF; Schwalbach B; Hofmann V; Istrate SE; Schuller Z; Ionescu E; Heimann S; Ragazzi M; Lux MP
Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():118-125. PubMed ID: 36240525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do All Positive Margins in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing a Partial Mastectomy Need to Be Resected?
Chagpar AB; Tsangaris TN; Lannin DR
J Am Coll Surg; 2018 Jul; 227(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 29524664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Relationship of Breast Density and Positive Lumpectomy Margins.
Gooch JC; Yoon E; Chun J; Kaplowitz E; Jubas T; Guth A; Axelrod D; Shapiro R; Darvishian F; Schnabel F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):1729-1736. PubMed ID: 30888516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of margin status after breast-conserving operations in an underscreened population.
Torabi R; Hsu CH; Patel PN; Dave H; Bouton ME; Komenaka IK
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2013 Mar; 398(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 23184267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
