These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37505353)
1. Does Preoperative MRI Reduce Positive Margins after Breast-Conserving Surgery? Cairns A; Chagpar AB; Dupont E; Levine EA; Gass JS; Chiba A; Ollila DW; Howard-McNatt M; Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Oct; 30(10):6053-6058. PubMed ID: 37505353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative breast MRI features associated with positive or close margins in breast-conserving surgery. Bae MS; Bernard-Davila B; Sung JS; Morris EA Eur J Radiol; 2019 Aug; 117():171-177. PubMed ID: 31307644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Associated with Positive Resection Margins in Patients with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma. Yoon J; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Park VY Korean J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 21(8):946-954. PubMed ID: 32677379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI can reduce the rate of tumor-positive resection margins after breast conserving surgery in patients with early non-mass breast carcinoma]. Li XS; Song YL; Li DC; Zhu HX; Meng LM; Huang RR; Wang SL; Wang D; Fang H; Fan HX Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 39(10):768-774. PubMed ID: 29061022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI predictors of tumor-positive margins after breast-conserving surgery. Bahl M; Baker JA; Kinsey EN; Ghate SV Clin Imaging; 2019; 57():45-49. PubMed ID: 31128385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. External validation and modification of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins before breast conserving surgery. Jung JJ; Kang E; Kim EK; Kim SM; Jang M; La Yun B; Park SY; Shin HC Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Sep; 183(2):373-380. PubMed ID: 32647937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Impact of Preoperative Breast MRI on Surgical Margin Status in Breast Cancer Patients Recalled at Biennial Screening Mammography: An Observational Cohort Study. Gommers JJJ; Duijm LEM; Bult P; Strobbe LJA; Kuipers TP; Hooijen MJH; Mann RM; Voogd AC Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Oct; 28(11):5929-5938. PubMed ID: 33796997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effect of Lumpectomy and Cavity Shave Margin Status on Recurrence and Survival in Breast-Conserving Surgery. Abdelsattar JM; Afridi FG; Dai Z; Yousaf N; Seldomridge A; Battin AO; Wen S; Gray D; Marsh JW; Cowher MS; Partin JF; Hazard-Jenkins H; Lupinacci K Am Surg; 2023 Mar; 89(3):424-433. PubMed ID: 34196595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer. Chagpar AB; Killelea BK; Tsangaris TN; Butler M; Stavris K; Li F; Yao X; Bossuyt V; Harigopal M; Lannin DR; Pusztai L; Horowitz NR N Engl J Med; 2015 Aug; 373(6):503-10. PubMed ID: 26028131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery. Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Should breast density influence patient selection for breast-conserving surgery? Kapoor NS; Eaton A; King TA; Patil S; Stempel M; Morris E; Brogi E; Morrow M Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Feb; 20(2):600-6. PubMed ID: 22941162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study. van Deurzen CH Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of margin assessment method on positive margin rate and total volume excised. Moo TA; Choi L; Culpepper C; Olcese C; Heerdt A; Sclafani L; King TA; Reiner AS; Patil S; Brogi E; Morrow M; Van Zee KJ Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 24046114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of age and extensive intraductal component histology upon breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor. Wazer DE; Schmidt-Ullrich RK; Ruthazer R; DiPetrillo T; Boyle T; Kanski J; Safaii H Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Nov; 45(4):885-91. PubMed ID: 10571194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhancing patterns of breast cancer on preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and resection margin in breast conserving therapy. Kim OH; Kim SJ; Lee JS Breast Dis; 2016 Feb; 36(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 27177341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Associated with Positive Resection Margins in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study. Kang JH; Youk JH; Kim JA; Gweon HM; Eun NL; Ko KH; Son EJ Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(5):897-904. PubMed ID: 30174479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscope for intraoperative margin assessment - POLARHIS study. Sandor MF; Schwalbach B; Hofmann V; Istrate SE; Schuller Z; Ionescu E; Heimann S; Ragazzi M; Lux MP Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():118-125. PubMed ID: 36240525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do All Positive Margins in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing a Partial Mastectomy Need to Be Resected? Chagpar AB; Tsangaris TN; Lannin DR J Am Coll Surg; 2018 Jul; 227(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 29524664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Relationship of Breast Density and Positive Lumpectomy Margins. Gooch JC; Yoon E; Chun J; Kaplowitz E; Jubas T; Guth A; Axelrod D; Shapiro R; Darvishian F; Schnabel F Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):1729-1736. PubMed ID: 30888516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of margin status after breast-conserving operations in an underscreened population. Torabi R; Hsu CH; Patel PN; Dave H; Bouton ME; Komenaka IK Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2013 Mar; 398(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 23184267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]