These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37505948)

  • 1. Exponential Shortcut to Measurement-Induced Entanglement Phase Transitions.
    Moghaddam AG; Pöyhönen K; Ojanen T
    Phys Rev Lett; 2023 Jul; 131(2):020401. PubMed ID: 37505948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural-network decoders for measurement induced phase transitions.
    Dehghani H; Lavasani A; Hafezi M; Gullans MJ
    Nat Commun; 2023 May; 14(1):2918. PubMed ID: 37217474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Observation of entanglement transition of pseudo-random mixed states.
    Liu T; Liu S; Li H; Li H; Huang K; Xiang Z; Song X; Xu K; Zheng D; Fan H
    Nat Commun; 2023 Apr; 14(1):1971. PubMed ID: 37031244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting quantum critical points using bipartite fluctuations.
    Rachel S; Laflorencie N; Song HF; Le Hur K
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Mar; 108(11):116401. PubMed ID: 22540493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multipartite entanglement, quantum coherence, and quantum criticality in triangular and Sierpiński fractal lattices.
    Cheng JQ; Xu JB
    Phys Rev E; 2018 Jun; 97(6-1):062134. PubMed ID: 30011478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient Bipartite Entanglement Detection Scheme with a Quantum Adversarial Solver.
    Yin XF; Du Y; Fei YY; Zhang R; Liu LZ; Mao Y; Liu T; Hsieh MH; Li L; Liu NL; Tao D; Chen YA; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2022 Mar; 128(11):110501. PubMed ID: 35363009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting Measurement-Induced Entanglement Transitions with Unitary Mirror Circuits.
    Yanay Y; Swingle B; Tahan C
    Phys Rev Lett; 2024 Aug; 133(7):070601. PubMed ID: 39213565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-point versus multipartite entanglement in quantum phase transitions.
    Anfossi A; Giorda P; Montorsi A; Traversa F
    Phys Rev Lett; 2005 Jul; 95(5):056402. PubMed ID: 16090896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Controlling Entanglement at Absorbing State Phase Transitions in Random Circuits.
    Sierant P; Turkeshi X
    Phys Rev Lett; 2023 Mar; 130(12):120402. PubMed ID: 37027858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Near-Field Generation and Control of Ultrafast, Multipartite Entanglement for Quantum Nanoplasmonic Networks.
    Bello FD; Kongsuwan N; Hess O
    Nano Lett; 2022 Apr; 22(7):2801-2808. PubMed ID: 35360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring statistics-induced entanglement entropy with a Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer.
    Zhang G; Hong C; Alkalay T; Umansky V; Heiblum M; Gornyi I; Gefen Y
    Nat Commun; 2024 Apr; 15(1):3428. PubMed ID: 38654002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel quantum phase transition from bounded to extensive entanglement.
    Zhang Z; Ahmadain A; Klich I
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 May; 114(20):5142-5146. PubMed ID: 28461464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Witnessing entanglement without entanglement witness operators.
    Pezzè L; Li Y; Li W; Smerzi A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Oct; 113(41):11459-11464. PubMed ID: 27681625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting Entanglement in Quantum Many-Body Systems via Permutation Moments.
    Liu Z; Tang Y; Dai H; Liu P; Chen S; Ma X
    Phys Rev Lett; 2022 Dec; 129(26):260501. PubMed ID: 36608179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Thermodynamic Signatures of Genuinely Multipartite Entanglement.
    Puliyil S; Banik M; Alimuddin M
    Phys Rev Lett; 2022 Aug; 129(7):070601. PubMed ID: 36018679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Topological transitions from multipartite entanglement with tensor networks: a procedure for sharper and faster characterization.
    Orús R; Wei TC; Buerschaper O; García-Saez A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Dec; 113(25):257202. PubMed ID: 25554905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scaling of Tripartite Entanglement at Impurity Quantum Phase Transitions.
    Bayat A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2017 Jan; 118(3):036102. PubMed ID: 28157365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental entanglement redistribution under decoherence channels.
    Aguilar GH; Valdés-Hernández A; Davidovich L; Walborn SP; Souto Ribeiro PH
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Dec; 113(24):240501. PubMed ID: 25541759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multipartite entanglement signature of quantum phase transitions.
    de Oliveira TR; Rigolin G; de Oliveira MC; Miranda E
    Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Oct; 97(17):170401. PubMed ID: 17155445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Entanglement, subsystem particle numbers and topology in free fermion systems.
    Zhang YF; Sheng L; Shen R; Wang R; Xing DY
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2014 Mar; 26(10):105502. PubMed ID: 24553300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.