160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37506078)
1. Discrete choice experiment versus swing-weighting: A head-to-head comparison of diabetic patient preferences for glucose-monitoring devices.
Whichello C; Smith I; Veldwijk J; de Wit GA; Rutten-van Molken MPMH; de Bekker-Grob EW
PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0283926. PubMed ID: 37506078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing Discrete Choice Experiment with Swing Weighting to Estimate Attribute Relative Importance: A Case Study in Lung Cancer Patient Preferences.
Veldwijk J; Smith IP; Oliveri S; Petrocchi S; Smith MY; Lanzoni L; Janssens R; Huys I; de Wit GA; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
Med Decis Making; 2024 Feb; 44(2):203-216. PubMed ID: 38178591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What matters most to patients with multiple myeloma? A Pan-European patient preference study.
Janssens R; Lang T; Vallejo A; Galinsky J; Morgan K; Plate A; De Ronne C; Verschueren M; Schoefs E; Vanhellemont A; Delforge M; Schjesvold F; Cabezudo E; Vandebroek M; Stevens H; Simoens S; Huys I
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():1027353. PubMed ID: 36523996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MCDA swing weighting and discrete choice experiments for elicitation of patient benefit-risk preferences: a critical assessment.
Tervonen T; Gelhorn H; Sri Bhashyam S; Poon JL; Gries KS; Rentz A; Marsh K
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1483-1491. PubMed ID: 28696023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing Analytic Hierarchy Process and Discrete-Choice Experiment to Elicit Patient Preferences for Treatment Characteristics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Danner M; Vennedey V; Hiligsmann M; Fauser S; Gross C; Stock S
Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1166-1173. PubMed ID: 28964450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Collecting Physicians' Preferences on Medical Devices: Are We Doing It Right? Evidence from Italian Orthopedists Using 2 Different Stated Preference Methods.
Armeni P; Meregaglia M; Borsoi L; Callea G; Torbica A; Benazzo F; Tarricone R
Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):886-900. PubMed ID: 37837325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attribute Selection for a Discrete Choice Experiment Incorporating a Best-Worst Scaling Survey.
Webb EJD; Meads D; Lynch Y; Judge S; Randall N; Goldbart J; Meredith S; Moulam L; Hess S; Murray J
Value Health; 2021 Apr; 24(4):575-584. PubMed ID: 33840436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Choosing vs. allocating: discrete choice experiments and constant-sum paired comparisons for the elicitation of societal preferences.
Skedgel CD; Wailoo AJ; Akehurst RL
Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):1227-40. PubMed ID: 23758539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient Preferences for Lung Cancer Treatments: A Study Protocol for a Preference Survey Using Discrete Choice Experiment and Swing Weighting.
Monzani D; Petrocchi S; Oliveri S; Veldwijk J; Janssens R; Bailo L; Smith MY; Smith I; Schoefs E; Nackaerts K; Vandevelde M; Louis E; Decaluwé H; De Leyn P; Declerck H; Katz EG; Petrella F; Casiraghi M; Durosini I; Galli G; Garassino MC; de Wit GA; Pravettoni G; Huys I
Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():689114. PubMed ID: 34409049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discrete Choice Experiment Attribute Selection Using a Multinational Interview Study: Treatment Features Important to Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Rydén A; Chen S; Flood E; Romero B; Grandy S
Patient; 2017 Aug; 10(4):475-487. PubMed ID: 28315192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the impact of excluded attributes on choice in a discrete choice experiment using a follow-up question.
Mansfield C; Sutphin J; Boeri M
Health Econ; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1307-1315. PubMed ID: 32627284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA
Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attribute nonattendance in COVID-19 vaccine choice: A discrete choice experiment based on Chinese public preference.
Xiao J; Wang F; Wang M; Ma Z
Health Expect; 2022 Jun; 25(3):959-970. PubMed ID: 35049117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing Preferences for Disease Profiles: A Discrete Choice Experiment from a US Societal Perspective.
Johnston KM; Audhya IF; Dunne J; Feeny D; Neumann P; Malone DC; Szabo SM; Gooch KL
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2024 May; 22(3):343-352. PubMed ID: 38253973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Valuing injection frequency and other attributes of type 2 diabetes treatments in Australia: a discrete choice experiment.
Fifer S; Rose J; Hamrosi KK; Swain D
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Aug; 18(1):675. PubMed ID: 30165844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Personalized diabetes management: what do patients with diabetes mellitus prefer? A discrete choice experiment.
Mühlbacher AC; Sadler A; Juhnke C
Eur J Health Econ; 2021 Apr; 22(3):425-443. PubMed ID: 33587221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of a Discrete-Choice Experiment (DCE) to Elicit Adolescent and Parent Preferences for Hypodontia Treatment.
Barber S; Bekker H; Marti J; Pavitt S; Khambay B; Meads D
Patient; 2019 Feb; 12(1):137-148. PubMed ID: 30367434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing Outcomes of a Discrete Choice Experiment and Case 2 Best-Worst Scaling: An Application to Neuromuscular Disease Treatment.
Soekhai V; Donkers B; Johansson JV; Jimenez-Moreno C; Pinto CA; de Wit GA; de Bekker-Grob E
Patient; 2023 May; 16(3):239-253. PubMed ID: 36781628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is Easier Better Than Harder? An Experiment on Choice Experiments for Benefit-Risk Tradeoff Preferences.
Yang JC; Reed SD; Hass S; Skeen MB; Johnson FR
Med Decis Making; 2021 Feb; 41(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 33463397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
