BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37507001)

  • 1. Stemless reverse humeral component neck-shaft angle has an influence on initial fixation.
    Cunningham DE; Spangenberg GW; Langohr GDG; Athwal GS; Johnson JA
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jan; 33(1):164-171. PubMed ID: 37507001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stemless components lead to improved radiographic restoration of humeral head anatomy compared with short-stemmed components in total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Sears BW; Creighton RA; Denard PJ; Griffin JW; Lichtenberg S; Lederman ES; Werner BC
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Feb; 32(2):240-246. PubMed ID: 36115615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of stemless humeral component fixation feature design on bone stress and strain response: a finite element analysis.
    Reeves JM; Langohr GDG; Athwal GS; Johnson JA
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Dec; 27(12):2232-2241. PubMed ID: 30104100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Restoration of the native humeral anatomy during stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a radiographic comparison of intramedullary versus freehand resection.
    Strony JT; LaBelle M; McMellen CJ; Golden ML; Chalmers P; Tashjian RZ; Gillespie RJ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Nov; 31(11):2225-2232. PubMed ID: 35569754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiographic restoration of native anatomy: a comparison between stemmed and stemless shoulder arthroplasty.
    Pinto MC; Archie AT; Mosher ZA; Ransom EF; McGwin G; Fehringer EV; Brabston EW; Ponce BA
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Aug; 28(8):1595-1600. PubMed ID: 30982698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiographic comparison of eccentric stemmed vs. concentric stemless prosthetic humeral head positioning after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Warren E; Levin JM; Rechenmacher AJ; Hurley ET; Lassiter T; Klifto CS; Anakwenze O
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jan; 33(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 37419439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiographic humeral head restoration after total shoulder arthroplasty: does the stem make a difference?
    Cox RM; Sholder D; Stoll L; Abboud JA; Williams GR; Ramsey ML; Lazarus MD; Horneff JG
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jan; 30(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 32713669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survival of stemless humeral head replacement in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study.
    Magosch P; Lichtenberg S; Habermeyer P
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jul; 30(7):e343-e355. PubMed ID: 33144222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of the humeral neck-shaft angle and glenosphere lateralization on stability of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.
    Ferle M; Pastor MF; Hagenah J; Hurschler C; Smith T
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 May; 28(5):966-973. PubMed ID: 30626537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of proximal humeral bone stresses between stemless, short stem, and standard stem length: a finite element analysis.
    Razfar N; Reeves JM; Langohr DG; Willing R; Athwal GS; Johnson JA
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1076-83. PubMed ID: 26810016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?
    Holschen M; Kiriazis A; Bockmann B; Schulte TL; Witt KA; Steinbeck J
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):307-315. PubMed ID: 33880654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical effects of humeral neck-shaft angle and subscapularis integrity in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Oh JH; Shin SJ; McGarry MH; Scott JH; Heckmann N; Lee TQ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Aug; 23(8):1091-8. PubMed ID: 24480326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fixed- vs. variable-angle humeral neck cut in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
    Joyce CD; Patel MS; Stoll K; Singh AM; Stone MA; Horneff JG; Austin L; Lazarus MD
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Aug; 31(8):1674-1681. PubMed ID: 35537570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary stability analysis of stemless shoulder implants.
    Quental C; Folgado J; Comenda M; Monteiro J; Sarmento M
    Med Eng Phys; 2020 Jul; 81():22-29. PubMed ID: 32507674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does computerized CT-based 3D planning of the humeral head cut help to restore the anatomy of the proximal humerus after stemless total shoulder arthroplasty?
    Grubhofer F; Muniz Martinez AR; Haberli J; Selig ME; Ernstbrunner L; Price MD; Warner JJP
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jun; 30(6):e309-e316. PubMed ID: 32950671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contact mechanics of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty during abduction: the effect of neck-shaft angle, humeral cup depth, and glenosphere diameter.
    Langohr GD; Willing R; Medley JB; Athwal GS; Johnson JA
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Apr; 25(4):589-97. PubMed ID: 26704359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adjusting Implant Size and Position Can Improve Internal Rotation After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Three-dimensional Computational Model.
    Huish EG; Athwal GS; Neyton L; Walch G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 33044311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short to mid-term results of stemless reverse shoulder arthroplasty in a selected patient population compared to a matched control group with stem.
    Moroder P; Ernstbrunner L; Zweiger C; Schatz M; Seitlinger G; Skursky R; Becker J; Resch H; Krifter RM
    Int Orthop; 2016 Oct; 40(10):2115-2120. PubMed ID: 27438011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Primary partial humeral head resurfacing: outcomes with the HemiCAP implant.
    Sweet SJ; Takara T; Ho L; Tibone JE
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 Mar; 43(3):579-87. PubMed ID: 25564407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of implant geometry on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty assessed using glenohumeral separation distance.
    North LR; Hetzler MA; Pickell M; Bryant JT; Deluzio KJ; Bicknell RT
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Sep; 24(9):1359-66. PubMed ID: 25725963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.