These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37507646)

  • 1. A revised diffusion model for conflict tasks.
    Lee PS; Sewell DK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 37507646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks.
    Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; König J; Hofbauer K; Mackenzie IG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):949-959. PubMed ID: 36316615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information in congruency sequence effects: Applying the diffusion model for conflict tasks.
    Koob V; Mackenzie I; Ulrich R; Leuthold H; Janczyk M
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Feb; 140():101528. PubMed ID: 36584549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: Superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions.
    Ulrich R; Schröter H; Leuthold H; Birngruber T
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 May; 78():148-74. PubMed ID: 25909766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the time-course of automatic response activation in the Simon task.
    Ellinghaus R; Karlbauer M; Bausenhart KM; Ulrich R
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jul; 82(4):734-743. PubMed ID: 28389812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of distractor relevance on the strength and timing of cognitive control: Evidence from delta plots and diffusion model analyses.
    Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Koob V; Janczyk M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Oct; 49(10):1588-1614. PubMed ID: 37561515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The time-course of distractor-based activation modulates effects of speed-accuracy tradeoffs in conflict tasks.
    Mittelstädt V; Miller J; Leuthold H; Mackenzie IG; Ulrich R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):837-854. PubMed ID: 34918279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A diffusion model for the congruency sequence effect.
    Luo C; Proctor RW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Dec; 29(6):2034-2051. PubMed ID: 35676612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strategy and processing speed eclipse individual differences in control ability in conflict tasks.
    Hedge C; Powell G; Bompas A; Sumner P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1448-1469. PubMed ID: 34591554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distributional reaction time properties in the Eriksen task: marked differences or hidden similarities with the Simon task?
    Burle B; Spieser L; Servant M; Hasbroucq T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Aug; 21(4):1003-10. PubMed ID: 24302468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interacting congruency effects in the hybrid Stroop-Simon task prevent conclusions regarding the domain specificity or generality of the congruency sequence effect.
    Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):945-967. PubMed ID: 31580121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of temporal order of relevant and irrelevant dimensions within conflict tasks.
    Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; Leuthold H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1099-1115. PubMed ID: 35980705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A model-based approach to disentangling facilitation and interference effects in conflict tasks.
    Evans NJ; Servant M
    Psychol Rev; 2022 Oct; 129(5):1183-1209. PubMed ID: 35482645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Target Amplification and Distractor Inhibition: Theta Oscillatory Dynamics of Selective Attention in a Flanker Task.
    Haciahmet CC; Frings C; Pastötter B
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 21(2):355-371. PubMed ID: 33721227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The neutral condition in conflict tasks: On the violation of the midpoint assumption in reaction time trends.
    Smith P; Ulrich R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 May; 77(5):1023-1043. PubMed ID: 37674259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task.
    Hübner R; Töbel L
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214203. PubMed ID: 30921368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eriksen flanker delta plot shapes depend on the stimulus.
    Pratte MS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):685-699. PubMed ID: 33155124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological correlates of proportion congruency manipulation in a temporal flanker task.
    Jost K; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Nov; 59(11):e14092. PubMed ID: 35569101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proactive reward in conflict tasks: Does it only enhance general performance or also modulate conflict effects?
    Bräutigam LC; Leuthold H; Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Aug; 86(6):2153-2168. PubMed ID: 38914923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Generality and specificity in cognitive control: conflict adaptation within and across selective-attention tasks but not across selective-attention and Simon tasks.
    Freitas AL; Clark SL
    Psychol Res; 2015 Jan; 79(1):143-62. PubMed ID: 24487727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.