These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37507656)

  • 1. A factor analytic comparison of three commonly used depression scales (HAMD, MADRS, BDI) in a large sample of depressed inpatients.
    Seemüller F; Schennach R; Musil R; Obermeier M; Adli M; Bauer M; Brieger P; Laux G; Gaebel W; Falkai P; Riedel M; Möller HJ
    BMC Psychiatry; 2023 Jul; 23(1):548. PubMed ID: 37507656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring depression: comparison and integration of three scales in the GENDEP study.
    Uher R; Farmer A; Maier W; Rietschel M; Hauser J; Marusic A; Mors O; Elkin A; Williamson RJ; Schmael C; Henigsberg N; Perez J; Mendlewicz J; Janzing JG; Zobel A; Skibinska M; Kozel D; Stamp AS; Bajs M; Placentino A; Barreto M; McGuffin P; Aitchison KJ
    Psychol Med; 2008 Feb; 38(2):289-300. PubMed ID: 17922940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison between the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the self-rating version of the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).
    Svanborg P; Asberg M
    J Affect Disord; 2001 May; 64(2-3):203-16. PubMed ID: 11313087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The validity of self-rated psychotic symptoms in depressed inpatients.
    Seemüller F; Riedel M; Obermeier M; Schennach-Wolff R; Spellmann I; Meyer S; Bauer M; Adli M; Kronmüller K; Ising M; Brieger P; Laux G; Bender W; Heuser I; Zeiler J; Gaebel W; Möller HJ
    Eur Psychiatry; 2012 Oct; 27(7):547-52. PubMed ID: 21392943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A study of the psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II, the Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in a sample from a healthy population.
    Kjaergaard M; Arfwedson Wang CE; Waterloo K; Jorde R
    Scand J Psychol; 2014 Feb; 55(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 24256317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation and psychometric properties of the Arabic version of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 7 items (HAMD-7) among non-clinical and clinical samples of Lebanese adults.
    Obeid S; Azzi V; Hallit S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285665. PubMed ID: 37200339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parsing the heterogeneity of depression: An exploratory factor analysis across commonly used depression rating scales.
    Ballard ED; Yarrington JS; Farmer CA; Lener MS; Kadriu B; Lally N; Williams D; Machado-Vieira R; Niciu MJ; Park L; Zarate CA
    J Affect Disord; 2018 Apr; 231():51-57. PubMed ID: 29448238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rating depression severity in the elderly physically ill patient: reliability and factor structure of the Hamilton and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scales.
    Hammond MF
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1998 Apr; 13(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 9646154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Moderate and severe depression. Gradations for the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale.
    Müller MJ; Szegedi A; Wetzel H; Benkert O
    J Affect Disord; 2000 Nov; 60(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 10967373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of depression in Parkinson's disease: the contribution of somatic symptoms to the clinimetric performance of the Hamilton and Montgomery-Asberg rating scales.
    Reijnders JS; Lousberg R; Leentjens AF
    J Psychosom Res; 2010 Jun; 68(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 20488273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-report and clinician-rated measures of depression severity: can one replace the other?
    Uher R; Perlis RH; Placentino A; Dernovšek MZ; Henigsberg N; Mors O; Maier W; McGuffin P; Farmer A
    Depress Anxiety; 2012 Dec; 29(12):1043-9. PubMed ID: 22933451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The validity of the Hamilton and Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scales as screening and diagnostic tools for depression in Parkinson's disease.
    Leentjens AF; Verhey FR; Lousberg R; Spitsbergen H; Wilmink FW
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2000 Jul; 15(7):644-9. PubMed ID: 10918346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity to detect change and the correlation of clinical factors with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory in depressed inpatients.
    Schneibel R; Brakemeier EL; Wilbertz G; Dykierek P; Zobel I; Schramm E
    Psychiatry Res; 2012 Jun; 198(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 22445070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factor structure and diagnostic validity of the Beck Depression Inventory-II with adult clinical inpatients: comparison to a gold-standard diagnostic interview.
    Subica AM; Fowler JC; Elhai JD; Frueh BC; Sharp C; Kelly EL; Allen JG
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Dec; 26(4):1106-15. PubMed ID: 24932646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confirmatory evaluation of the bipolar depression rating scale (BDRS) in a large sample of female patients with bipolar depression.
    Khosravani V; Berk M; Samimi Ardestani SM; Sharifi Bastan F
    Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract; 2022 Mar; 26(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 33825607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychometric evaluation of the Malay version of the Montgomery- Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-BM).
    Yee A; Yassim AR; Loh HS; Ng CG; Tan KA
    BMC Psychiatry; 2015 Aug; 15():200. PubMed ID: 26286597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inpatients with major depressive disorder: Psychometric properties of the new Multidimensional Depression Scale.
    Darharaj M; Habibi M; Power MJ; Farzadian F; Rahimi M; Kholghi H; Kazemitabar M
    Asian J Psychiatr; 2016 Dec; 24():103-109. PubMed ID: 27931890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of depressive symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease using the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale.
    Bunevicius A; Staniute M; Brozaitiene J; Pommer AM; Pop VJ; Montgomery SA; Bunevicius R
    Int Clin Psychopharmacol; 2012 Sep; 27(5):249-55. PubMed ID: 22869009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are self-report scales as effective as clinician rating scales in measuring treatment response in routine clinical practice?
    Zimmerman M; Walsh E; Friedman M; Boerescu DA; Attiullah N
    J Affect Disord; 2018 Jan; 225():449-452. PubMed ID: 28858659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The structure of the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale over the course of treatment for depression.
    Quilty LC; Robinson JJ; Rolland JP; Fruyt FD; Rouillon F; Bagby RM
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2013 Sep; 22(3):175-84. PubMed ID: 24038301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.