135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37508780)
1. Extreme Gradient Boosting Tuned with Metaheuristic Algorithms for Predicting Myeloid NGS Onco-Somatic Variant Pathogenicity.
Pellegrino E; Camilla C; Abbou N; Beaufils N; Pissier C; Gabert J; Nanni-Metellus I; Ouafik L
Bioengineering (Basel); 2023 Jun; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 37508780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Machine learning random forest for predicting oncosomatic variant NGS analysis.
Pellegrino E; Jacques C; Beaufils N; Nanni I; Carlioz A; Metellus P; Ouafik L
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):21820. PubMed ID: 34750410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cruxome: a powerful tool for annotating, interpreting and reporting genetic variants.
Han Q; Yang Y; Wu S; Liao Y; Zhang S; Liang H; Cram DS; Zhang Y
BMC Genomics; 2021 Jun; 22(1):407. PubMed ID: 34082700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting Measles Outbreaks in the United States: Evaluation of Machine Learning Approaches.
Ru B; Kujawski S; Lee Afanador N; Baumgartner R; Pawaskar M; Das A
JMIR Form Res; 2023 Apr; 7():e42832. PubMed ID: 37014694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of lung cancer risk in Chinese population with genetic-environment factor using extreme gradient boosting.
Li Y; Zou Z; Gao Z; Wang Y; Xiao M; Xu C; Jiang G; Wang H; Jin L; Wang J; Wang HZ; Guo S; Wu J
Cancer Med; 2022 Dec; 11(23):4469-4478. PubMed ID: 35499292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feature-based classifiers for somatic mutation detection in tumour-normal paired sequencing data.
Ding J; Bashashati A; Roth A; Oloumi A; Tse K; Zeng T; Haffari G; Hirst M; Marra MA; Condon A; Aparicio S; Shah SP
Bioinformatics; 2012 Jan; 28(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 22084253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A machine learning model to determine the accuracy of variant calls in capture-based next generation sequencing.
van den Akker J; Mishne G; Zimmer AD; Zhou AY
BMC Genomics; 2018 Apr; 19(1):263. PubMed ID: 29665779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SNVSniffer: an integrated caller for germline and somatic single-nucleotide and indel mutations.
Liu Y; Loewer M; Aluru S; Schmidt B
BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):47. PubMed ID: 27489955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accurate Ensemble Prediction of Somatic Mutations with SMuRF2.
Huang W; Sim NL; Skanderup AJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2493():53-66. PubMed ID: 35751808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites through eXtreme gradient boosting with kernel principal component analysis.
Wang X; Zhang Y; Yu B; Salhi A; Chen R; Wang L; Liu Z
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Jul; 134():104516. PubMed ID: 34119922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the Calling Performance of a Rare Disease NGS Panel for Single Nucleotide and Copy Number Variants.
Cacheiro P; Ordóñez-Ugalde A; Quintáns B; Piñeiro-Hermida S; Amigo J; García-Murias M; Pascual-Pascual SI; Grandas F; Arpa J; Carracedo A; Sobrido MJ
Mol Diagn Ther; 2017 Jun; 21(3):303-313. PubMed ID: 28290094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tool evaluation for the detection of variably sized indels from next generation whole genome and targeted sequencing data.
Wang N; Lysenkov V; Orte K; Kairisto V; Aakko J; Khan S; Elo LL
PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Feb; 18(2):e1009269. PubMed ID: 35176018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic classification of cancers using extreme gradient boosting algorithm and multi-omics data.
Ma B; Meng F; Yan G; Yan H; Chai B; Song F
Comput Biol Med; 2020 Jun; 121():103761. PubMed ID: 32339094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Compressive Strength Prediction of Cemented Backfill Containing Phosphate Tailings Using Extreme Gradient Boosting Optimized by Whale Optimization Algorithm.
Xiong S; Liu Z; Min C; Shi Y; Zhang S; Liu W
Materials (Basel); 2022 Dec; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 36614647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using machine learning to realize genetic site screening and genomic prediction of productive traits in pigs.
Xiang T; Li T; Li J; Li X; Wang J
FASEB J; 2023 Jun; 37(6):e22961. PubMed ID: 37178007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved Variant Detection in Clinical Myeloid NGS Testing by Supplementing a Commercial Myeloid NGS Assay with Custom or Extended Data Filtering and Accessory Fragment Analysis.
Schejbel L; Novotny GW; Breinholt MF; El Fassi D; Schöllkopf C; Hogdall E; Nørgaard P
Mol Diagn Ther; 2021 Mar; 25(2):251-266. PubMed ID: 33687704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting the Tool Wear of a Drilling Process Using Novel Machine Learning XGBoost-SDA.
Alajmi MS; Almeshal AM
Materials (Basel); 2020 Nov; 13(21):. PubMed ID: 33158099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.
Wu Z; Zhu M; Kang Y; Leung EL; Lei T; Shen C; Jiang D; Wang Z; Cao D; Hou T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33313673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction model of obstructive sleep apnea-related hypertension: Machine learning-based development and interpretation study.
Shi Y; Ma L; Chen X; Li W; Feng Y; Zhang Y; Cao Z; Yuan Y; Xie Y; Liu H; Yin L; Zhao C; Wu S; Ren X
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():1042996. PubMed ID: 36545020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
