167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37515597)
21. An interpretable artificial intelligence system for detecting risk factors of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding.
Wang J; Wang Z; Chen M; Xiao Y; Chen S; Wu L; Yao L; Jiang X; Li J; Xu M; Lin M; Zhu Y; Luo R; Zhang C; Li X; Yu H
NPJ Digit Med; 2022 Dec; 5(1):183. PubMed ID: 36536039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ability of artificial intelligence to detect T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from endoscopic videos and the effects of real-time assistance.
Shiroma S; Yoshio T; Kato Y; Horie Y; Namikawa K; Tokai Y; Yoshimizu S; Yoshizawa N; Horiuchi Y; Ishiyama A; Hirasawa T; Tsuchida T; Akazawa N; Akiyama J; Tada T; Fujisaki J
Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):7759. PubMed ID: 33833355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Utility of an artificial intelligence system for classification of esophageal lesions when simulating its clinical use.
Tajiri A; Ishihara R; Kato Y; Inoue T; Matsueda K; Miyake M; Waki K; Shimamoto Y; Fukuda H; Matsuura N; Egawa S; Yamaguchi S; Ogiyama H; Ogiso K; Nishida T; Aoi K; Tada T
Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6677. PubMed ID: 35461350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Deep learning model for diagnosing gastric mucosal lesions using endoscopic images: development, validation, and method comparison.
Nam JY; Chung HJ; Choi KS; Lee H; Kim TJ; Soh H; Kang EA; Cho SJ; Ye JC; Im JP; Kim SG; Kim JS; Chung H; Lee JH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Feb; 95(2):258-268.e10. PubMed ID: 34492271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Current Evidence and Future Perspective of Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Application for Early Gastric Cancer Diagnosis With Endoscopy: A Systematic and Meta-Analysis.
Jiang K; Jiang X; Pan J; Wen Y; Huang Y; Weng S; Lan S; Nie K; Zheng Z; Ji S; Liu P; Li P; Liu F
Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():629080. PubMed ID: 33791323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Development and validation of a real-time artificial intelligence-assisted system for detecting early gastric cancer: A multicentre retrospective diagnostic study.
Tang D; Wang L; Ling T; Lv Y; Ni M; Zhan Q; Fu Y; Zhuang D; Guo H; Dou X; Zhang W; Xu G; Zou X
EBioMedicine; 2020 Dec; 62():103146. PubMed ID: 33254026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of gastric precancerous conditions by image-enhanced endoscopy: a multicenter, diagnostic study (with video).
Xu M; Zhou W; Wu L; Zhang J; Wang J; Mu G; Huang X; Li Y; Yuan J; Zeng Z; Wang Y; Huang L; Liu J; Yu H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Sep; 94(3):540-548.e4. PubMed ID: 33722576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analyzing Surgical Technique in Diverse Open Surgical Videos With Multitask Machine Learning.
Goodman ED; Patel KK; Zhang Y; Locke W; Kennedy CJ; Mehrotra R; Ren S; Guan M; Zohar O; Downing M; Chen HW; Clark JZ; Berrigan MT; Brat GA; Yeung-Levy S
JAMA Surg; 2024 Feb; 159(2):185-192. PubMed ID: 38055227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Real-time artificial intelligence for endoscopic diagnosis of early esophageal squamous cell cancer (with video).
Yang XX; Li Z; Shao XJ; Ji R; Qu JY; Zheng MQ; Sun YN; Zhou RC; You H; Li LX; Feng J; Yang XY; Li YQ; Zuo XL
Dig Endosc; 2021 Nov; 33(7):1075-1084. PubMed ID: 33275789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Artificial Intelligence in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
Tokat M; van Tilburg L; Koch AD; Spaander MCW
Dig Dis; 2022; 40(4):395-408. PubMed ID: 34348267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Usefulness of an artificial intelligence system for the detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma evaluated with videos simulating overlooking situation.
Waki K; Ishihara R; Kato Y; Shoji A; Inoue T; Matsueda K; Miyake M; Shimamoto Y; Fukuda H; Matsuura N; Ono Y; Yao K; Hashimoto S; Terai S; Ohmori M; Tanaka K; Kato M; Shono T; Miyamoto H; Tanaka Y; Tada T
Dig Endosc; 2021 Nov; 33(7):1101-1109. PubMed ID: 33502046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic group classifications of gastric neoplasms by endoscopic resection criteria before and after treatment: real-world experience.
Lee JH; Min YW; Lee JH; Kim ER; Lee H; Min BH; Kim JJ; Jang KT; Kim KM; Park CK
Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3987-93. PubMed ID: 26694184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of a deep learning-based system on the miss rate of gastric neoplasms during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a single-centre, tandem, randomised controlled trial.
Wu L; Shang R; Sharma P; Zhou W; Liu J; Yao L; Dong Z; Yuan J; Zeng Z; Yu Y; He C; Xiong Q; Li Y; Deng Y; Cao Z; Huang C; Zhou R; Li H; Hu G; Chen Y; Wang Y; He X; Zhu Y; Yu H
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 6(9):700-708. PubMed ID: 34297944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Real-time artificial intelligence for detection of upper gastrointestinal cancer by endoscopy: a multicentre, case-control, diagnostic study.
Luo H; Xu G; Li C; He L; Luo L; Wang Z; Jing B; Deng Y; Jin Y; Li Y; Li B; Tan W; He C; Seeruttun SR; Wu Q; Huang J; Huang DW; Chen B; Lin SB; Chen QM; Yuan CM; Chen HX; Pu HY; Zhou F; He Y; Xu RH
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1645-1654. PubMed ID: 31591062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A study on the improvement in the ability of endoscopists to diagnose gastric neoplasms using an artificial intelligence system.
Zhang B; Zhang W; Yao H; Qiao J; Zhang H; Song Y
Front Med (Lausanne); 2024; 11():1323516. PubMed ID: 38348337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A real-time deep learning-based system for colorectal polyp size estimation by white-light endoscopy: development and multicenter prospective validation.
Wang J; Li Y; Chen B; Cheng D; Liao F; Tan T; Xu Q; Liu Z; Huang Y; Zhu C; Cao W; Yao L; Wu Z; Wu L; Zhang C; Xiao B; Xu M; Liu J; Li S; Yu H
Endoscopy; 2024 Apr; 56(4):260-270. PubMed ID: 37827513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Multi-center verification of the influence of data ratio of training sets on test results of an AI system for detecting early gastric cancer based on the YOLO-v4 algorithm.
Jin T; Jiang Y; Mao B; Wang X; Lu B; Qian J; Zhou H; Ma T; Zhang Y; Li S; Shi Y; Yao Z
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():953090. PubMed ID: 36052264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in the Endoscopic Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer: Pooled Analysis Study.
Chen PC; Lu YR; Kang YN; Chang CC
J Med Internet Res; 2022 May; 24(5):e27694. PubMed ID: 35576561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A hybrid artificial intelligence model leverages multi-centric clinical data to improve fetal heart rate pregnancy prediction across time-lapse systems.
Duval A; Nogueira D; Dissler N; Maskani Filali M; Delestro Matos F; Chansel-Debordeaux L; Ferrer-Buitrago M; Ferrer E; Antequera V; Ruiz-Jorro M; Papaxanthos A; Ouchchane H; Keppi B; Prima PY; Regnier-Vigouroux G; Trebesses L; Geoffroy-Siraudin C; Zaragoza S; Scalici E; Sanguinet P; Cassagnard N; Ozanon C; De La Fuente A; Gómez E; Gervoise Boyer M; Boyer P; Ricciarelli E; Pollet-Villard X; Boussommier-Calleja A
Hum Reprod; 2023 Apr; 38(4):596-608. PubMed ID: 36763673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Artificial intelligence-based diagnostic system classifying gastric cancers and ulcers: comparison between the original and newly developed systems.
Namikawa K; Hirasawa T; Nakano K; Ikenoyama Y; Ishioka M; Shiroma S; Tokai Y; Yoshimizu S; Horiuchi Y; Ishiyama A; Yoshio T; Tsuchida T; Fujisaki J; Tada T
Endoscopy; 2020 Dec; 52(12):1077-1083. PubMed ID: 32503056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
