BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37516096)

  • 1. Esophageal cancer T-staging on MRI: A preliminary study using cine and static MR sequences.
    Haefliger L; Jreige M; Du Pasquier C; Ledoux JB; Wagner D; Mantziari S; Shäfer M; Vietti Violi N; Dromain C
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Sep; 166():111001. PubMed ID: 37516096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of 3 T MRI, CT and endoscopic ultrasound for preoperative T staging of potentially resectable esophageal cancer.
    Guo J; Wang Z; Qin J; Zhang H; Liu W; Zhao Y; Lu Y; Yan X; Zhang Z; Zhang T; Zhang S; Dominik NM; Kamel IR; Li H; Qu J
    Cancer Imaging; 2020 Sep; 20(1):64. PubMed ID: 32912319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between free-breathing radial VIBE on 3-T MRI and endoscopic ultrasound for preoperative T staging of resectable oesophageal cancer, with histopathological correlation.
    Qu J; Zhang H; Wang Z; Zhang F; Liu H; Ding Z; Li Y; Ma J; Zhang Z; Zhang S; Dong Y; Jiang L; Zhang W; Grimm R; Kiefer B; Kamel IR; Qin J; Li H
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):780-787. PubMed ID: 28799124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of 3-T MRI for Preoperative T Staging of Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, With Histopathologic Correlation.
    Wang Z; Guo J; Qin J; Zhang H; Zhao Y; Lu Y; Yan X; Zhang F; Zhang Z; Zhang T; Zhang S; Dong Y; Jiang L; Grimm R; Li H; Kamel IR; Qu J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Apr; 212(4):788-795. PubMed ID: 30673335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR imaging characteristics of different pathologic subtypes of esophageal carcinoma.
    Wang Z; Chu F; Bai B; Lu S; Zhang H; Jia Z; Zhao K; Zhang Y; Zheng Y; Xia Q; Li X; Kamel IR; Li H; Qu J
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Dec; 33(12):9233-9243. PubMed ID: 37482548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic performance in T staging for patients with esophagogastric junction cancer using high-resolution MRI: a comparison with conventional MRI at 3 tesla.
    Yuan Y; Chen L; Ren S; Wang Z; Chen Y; Jin A; Li S; Fang X; Wang T; Bian Y; Yang Q; Bai C; Hao Q; Lu J
    Cancer Imaging; 2019 Dec; 19(1):83. PubMed ID: 31801587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A comparison between 3.0 T MRI and histopathology for preoperative T staging of potentially resectable esophageal cancer].
    Wang ZQ; Zhang FG; Guo J; Zhang HK; Qin JJ; Zhao Y; Ding ZD; Zhang ZX; Zhang JB; Yuan JH; Li HL; Qu JR
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 97(11):843-846. PubMed ID: 28355740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic performance of 64-MDCT and 1.5-T MRI with high-resolution sequences in the T staging of gastric cancer: a comparative analysis with histopathology.
    Anzidei M; Napoli A; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Zini C; Cavallo Marincola B; Geiger D; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2009 Oct; 114(7):1065-79. PubMed ID: 19774440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preoperative locoregional staging of gastric cancer: is there a place for magnetic resonance imaging? Prospective comparison with EUS and multidetector computed tomography.
    Giganti F; Orsenigo E; Arcidiacono PG; Nicoletti R; Albarello L; Ambrosi A; Salerno A; Esposito A; Petrone MC; Chiari D; Staudacher C; Del Maschio A; De Cobelli F
    Gastric Cancer; 2016 Jan; 19(1):216-25. PubMed ID: 25614468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality control of endoscopic ultrasound in preoperative staging of esophageal cancer.
    Kutup A; Link BC; Schurr PG; Strate T; Kaifi JT; Bubenheim M; Seewald S; Yekebas EF; Soehendra N; Izbicki JR
    Endoscopy; 2007 Aug; 39(8):715-9. PubMed ID: 17661247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective comparison of MR with diffusion-weighted imaging, endoscopic ultrasound, MDCT and positron emission tomography-CT in the pre-operative staging of oesophageal cancer: results from a pilot study.
    Giganti F; Ambrosi A; Petrone MC; Canevari C; Chiari D; Salerno A; Arcidiacono PG; Nicoletti R; Albarello L; Mazza E; Gallivanone F; Gianolli L; Orsenigo E; Esposito A; Staudacher C; Del Maschio A; De Cobelli F
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 89(1068):20160087. PubMed ID: 27767330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of esophageal peristalsis in patients with esophageal tumors: initial experience with cine MR imaging.
    Koyama T; Umeoka S; Saga T; Watanabe G; Tamai K; Kobayashi A; Hiraga A; Shimada Y; Togashi K
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2005; 4(3):109-14. PubMed ID: 16462130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical implication of PET/MR imaging in preoperative esophageal cancer staging: comparison with PET/CT, endoscopic ultrasonography, and CT.
    Lee G; I H; Kim SJ; Jeong YJ; Kim IJ; Pak K; Park DY; Kim GH
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Aug; 55(8):1242-7. PubMed ID: 24868109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Staging accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound for esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Sun F; Chen T; Han J; Ye P; Hu J
    Dis Esophagus; 2015; 28(8):757-71. PubMed ID: 25168285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization of indeterminate soft tissue masses referred for biopsy: What is the added value of contrast imaging at 3.0 tesla?
    Del Grande F; Ahlawat S; Subhawong T; Fayad LM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 45(2):390-400. PubMed ID: 27417663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MRI features in differentiating mucosal high-grade neoplasia from early invasive squamous cell cancer of the esophagus.
    Qu J; Wang Z; Qin J; Zhang H; Zhao Y; Lu Y; Yan X; Zhang S; Wang S; Kamel IR; Li H
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jun; 30(6):3455-3461. PubMed ID: 32086576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Diagnostic value of 3.0-tesla high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging for invasion depth of rectal cancer].
    Yao X; Song X; Wang Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 19(6):668-74. PubMed ID: 27353102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preoperative T and N staging of gastric cancer: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus multi detector computed tomography (MDCT).
    Maccioni F; Marcelli G; Al Ansari N; Zippi M; De Marco V; Kagarmanova A; Vestri A; Marcheggiano-Clarke L; Marini M
    Clin Ter; 2010; 161(2):e57-62. PubMed ID: 20499021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EUS and magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of rectal cancer: a prospective and comparative study.
    Fernández-Esparrach G; Ayuso-Colella JR; Sendino O; Pagés M; Cuatrecasas M; Pellisé M; Maurel J; Ayuso-Colella C; González-Suárez B; Llach J; Castells A; Ginès A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Aug; 74(2):347-54. PubMed ID: 21802588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of MRI on the post-therapeutic diagnosis of T4 esophageal cancer.
    Harino T; Yamasaki M; Murai S; Yamashita K; Tanaka K; Makino T; Saito T; Yamamoto K; Takahashi T; Kurokawa Y; Nakajima K; Tomiyama N; Eguchi H; Nakamura H; Doki Y
    Esophagus; 2023 Oct; 20(4):740-748. PubMed ID: 37233847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.