These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37516339)

  • 1. Accuracy of single-implant digital impression with various scanbody exposure levels at anterior and posterior regions.
    Wu HK; Chen G; Huang X; Deng F; Li Y
    J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104641. PubMed ID: 37516339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impression with or without scanbody splinting: An in vitro study.
    Pozzi A; Arcuri L; Lio F; Papa A; Nardi A; Londono J
    J Dent; 2022 Apr; 119():104072. PubMed ID: 35189313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of a chairside reverse scanbody workflow for a complete arch implant-supported prosthesis using four intraoral scanners versus a desktop scanner.
    Nuytens P; Vandeweghe S; D'haese R
    J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104717. PubMed ID: 37739058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.
    Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of digital implant analog design on the positional trueness of an analog in additively manufactured models: An in-vitro study.
    Mata-Mata SJ; Donmez MB; Meirelles L; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Dec; 24(6):821-830. PubMed ID: 36196856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of single implant scans with a healing abutment-scanpeg system compared with the scans of a scanbody and conventional impressions: An in vitro study.
    Yilmaz B; Gouveia D; Marques VR; Diker E; Schimmel M; Abou-Ayash S
    J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103684. PubMed ID: 33961938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of three digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation: An in vitro comparison.
    Gao H; Liu X; Liu M; Yang X; Tan J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 33736864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of implant scanbody material, position and operator on the accuracy of digital impression for complete-arch: A randomized in vitro trial.
    Arcuri L; Pozzi A; Lio F; Rompen E; Zechner W; Nardi A
    J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Apr; 64(2):128-136. PubMed ID: 31255546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro assessment of the accuracy of digital impressions prepared using a single system for full-arch restorations on implants.
    Ciocca L; Meneghello R; Monaco C; Savio G; Scheda L; Gatto MR; Baldissara P
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Jul; 13(7):1097-1108. PubMed ID: 29500759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla.
    Abdeen L; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1238-1246. PubMed ID: 36415927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of impressions for multiple implants: A comparative study of digital and conventional techniques.
    Lyu M; Di P; Lin Y; Jiang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1017-1023. PubMed ID: 33640093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of coded healing abutment height and position on the trueness of digital intraoral implant scans.
    Batak B; Yilmaz B; Shah K; Rathi R; Schimmel M; Lang L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):466-472. PubMed ID: 31542216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions.
    Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A fully digital approach to replicate peri-implant soft tissue contours and emergence profile in the esthetic zone.
    Monaco C; Evangelisti E; Scotti R; Mignani G; Zucchelli G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1511-1514. PubMed ID: 25907030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.
    Ma B; Yue X; Sun Y; Peng L; Geng W
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):636. PubMed ID: 34893053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the accuracy between conventional and various digital implant impressions for an implant-supported mandibular complete arch-fixed prosthesis: An in vitro study.
    Kosago P; Ungurawasaporn C; Kukiattrakoon B
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):616-624. PubMed ID: 36083233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between stereophotogrammetric, digital, and conventional impression techniques in implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: An in vitro study.
    Tohme H; Lawand G; Chmielewska M; Makhzoume J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Feb; 129(2):354-362. PubMed ID: 34112521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study.
    Ke Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun Y
    J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104561. PubMed ID: 37236297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.