126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37517077)
21. Dose- rather than fluence-averaged LET should be used as a single-parameter descriptor of proton beam quality for radiochromic film dosimetry.
Resch AF; Heyes PD; Fuchs H; Bassler N; Georg D; Palmans H
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2289-2299. PubMed ID: 32166764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A mathematical expression for depth-light curves of therapeutic proton beams in a quenching scintillator.
Kelleter L; Jolly S
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2300-2308. PubMed ID: 32072646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quality assurance in proton beam therapy using a plastic scintillator and a commercially available digital camera.
Almurayshid M; Helo Y; Kacperek A; Griffiths J; Hebden J; Gibson A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):210-219. PubMed ID: 28755419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. TOPAS Simulation of the Mevion S250 compact proton therapy unit.
Prusator M; Ahmad S; Chen Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 May; 18(3):88-95. PubMed ID: 28444840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Technical Note: Experimental verification of magnetic field-induced beam deflection and Bragg peak displacement for MR-integrated proton therapy.
Schellhammer SM; Gantz S; Lühr A; Oborn BM; Bussmann M; Hoffmann AL
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3429-3434. PubMed ID: 29763970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Nuclear interactions in proton therapy: dose and relative biological effect distributions originating from primary and secondary particles.
Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Mar; 47(5):747-64. PubMed ID: 11931469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quenching correction for volumetric scintillation dosimetry of proton beams.
Robertson D; Mirkovic D; Sahoo N; Beddar S
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jan; 58(2):261-73. PubMed ID: 23257200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Monte Carlo investigation of collimator scatter of proton-therapy beams produced using the passive scattering method.
Titt U; Zheng Y; Vassiliev ON; Newhauser WD
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):487-504. PubMed ID: 18185001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Synchronized high-speed scintillation imaging of proton beams, generated by a gantry-mounted synchrocyclotron, on a pulse-by-pulse basis.
Goddu SM; Westphal GT; Sun B; Wu Y; Bloch CD; Bradley JD; Darafsheh A
Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 49(9):6209-6220. PubMed ID: 35760763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Independent dose verification system with Monte Carlo simulations using TOPAS for passive scattering proton therapy at the National Cancer Center in Korea.
Shin WG; Testa M; Kim HS; Jeong JH; Lee SB; Kim YJ; Min CH
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7598-7616. PubMed ID: 28809759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. DeepBeam: a machine learning framework for tuning the primary electron beam of the PRIMO Monte Carlo software.
Tabor Z; Kabat D; Waligórski MPR
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jun; 16(1):124. PubMed ID: 34187495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Huang S; Kang M; Souris K; Ainsley C; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Simone CB; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):558-572. PubMed ID: 30058170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A feasibility study of enhanced prompt gamma imaging for range verification in proton therapy using deep learning.
Jiang Z; Polf JC; Barajas CA; Gobbert MK; Ren L
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Mar; 68(7):. PubMed ID: 36848674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Development of a Monte Carlo beam model for raster scanning proton beams and dosimetric comparison.
Sheng Y; Wang W; Huang Z; Wu X; Schlegel N; Zhang Q; Shahnaz K; Zhao J
Int J Radiat Biol; 2020 Nov; 96(11):1435-1442. PubMed ID: 32816596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Commissioning and validation of a novel commercial TPS for ocular proton therapy.
Wulff J; Koska B; Heufelder J; Janson M; Bäcker CM; Siregar H; Behrends C; Bäumer C; Foerster A; Bechrakis NE; Timmermann B
Med Phys; 2023 Jan; 50(1):365-379. PubMed ID: 36195575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Platform for automatic patient quality assurance via Monte Carlo simulations in proton therapy.
Guterres Marmitt G; Pin A; Ng Wei Siang K; Janssens G; Souris K; Cohilis M; Langendijk JA; Both S; Knopf A; Meijers A
Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():49-57. PubMed ID: 31968277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Single pencil beam benchmark of a module for Monte Carlo simulation of proton transport in the PENELOPE code.
Verbeek N; Wulff J; Bäumer C; Smyczek S; Timmermann B; Brualla L
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):456-476. PubMed ID: 33217026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Characterization and validation of a Monte Carlo code for independent dose calculation in proton therapy treatments with pencil beam scanning.
Fracchiolla F; Lorentini S; Widesott L; Schwarz M
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 60(21):8601-19. PubMed ID: 26501569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of the influence of double and triple Gaussian proton kernel models on accuracy of dose calculations for spot scanning technique.
Hirayama S; Takayanagi T; Fujii Y; Fujimoto R; Fujitaka S; Umezawa M; Nagamine Y; Hosaka M; Yasui K; Omachi C; Toshito T
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1437-50. PubMed ID: 26936728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
