These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37519902)

  • 1. Internal selective attention is delayed by competition between endogenous and exogenous factors.
    Ester EF; Nouri A
    iScience; 2023 Jul; 26(7):107259. PubMed ID: 37519902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Goal-directed and stimulus-driven selection of internal representations.
    van Ede F; Board AG; Nobre AC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(39):24590-24598. PubMed ID: 32929036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural Signatures of Competition between Voluntary and Involuntary Influences over the Focus of Attention in Visual Working Memory.
    Ding Y; Postle BR; van Ede F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 May; 36(5):815-827. PubMed ID: 38319683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus Heterogeneity in a Task-Irrelevant Dimension Affects Selective Attention.
    Kim CH; Han SW
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2023 Jun; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 37366747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Working memory load modulates distractor competition in primary visual cortex.
    Kelley TA; Lavie N
    Cereb Cortex; 2011 Mar; 21(3):659-65. PubMed ID: 20699229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linguistic processing of task-irrelevant speech at a cocktail party.
    Har-Shai Yahav P; Zion Golumbic E
    Elife; 2021 May; 10():. PubMed ID: 33942722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual Alpha Peak Frequency Predicts 10 Hz Flicker Effects on Selective Attention.
    Gulbinaite R; van Viegen T; Wieling M; Cohen MX; VanRullen R
    J Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 37(42):10173-10184. PubMed ID: 28931569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the temporal dynamics and efficacy of task-relevant and task-irrelevant memory-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Cogn Process; 2022 May; 23(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 35001208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Working memory as internal attention: toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes.
    Kiyonaga A; Egner T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):228-42. PubMed ID: 23233157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Working-Memory-Guided Attention Competes with Exogenous Attention but Not with Endogenous Attention.
    Zhu P; Yang Q; Chen L; Guan C; Zhou J; Shen M; Chen H
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2023 May; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 37232663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Previously Reward-Associated Stimuli Capture Spatial Attention in the Absence of Changes in the Corresponding Sensory Representations as Measured with MEG.
    Tankelevitch L; Spaak E; Rushworth MFS; Stokes MG
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 40(26):5033-5050. PubMed ID: 32366722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Musical Training Facilitates Exogenous Temporal Attention via Delta Phase Entrainment within a Sensorimotor Network.
    Nandi B; Ostrand A; Johnson V; Ford TJ; Gazzaley A; Zanto TP
    J Neurosci; 2023 May; 43(18):3365-3378. PubMed ID: 36977585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field.
    Schwartz S; Vuilleumier P; Hutton C; Maravita A; Dolan RJ; Driver J
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Jun; 15(6):770-86. PubMed ID: 15459076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in behavioral priority influence the accessibility of working memory content.
    Ester EF; Pytel P
    Neuroimage; 2023 May; 272():120055. PubMed ID: 37001833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective attention to stimulus representations in perception and memory: commonalities and differences.
    Kizilirmak JM; Glim S; Darna M; Khader PH
    Psychol Res; 2022 Feb; 86(1):150-169. PubMed ID: 33486589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Working memory delay period activity marks a domain-unspecific attention mechanism.
    Katus T; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2016 Mar; 128():149-157. PubMed ID: 26756177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inferior parietal and right frontal contributions to trial-by-trial adaptations of attention to memory.
    Kizilirmak JM; Rösler F; Bien S; Khader PH
    Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 1614():14-27. PubMed ID: 25892601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention rhythmically samples multi-feature objects in working memory.
    Chota S; Leto C; van Zantwijk L; Van der Stigchel S
    Sci Rep; 2022 Aug; 12(1):14703. PubMed ID: 36038570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Center-Surround Inhibition in Working Memory.
    Kiyonaga A; Egner T
    Curr Biol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 26711496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alpha and theta mechanisms operating in internal-external attention competition.
    Magosso E; Ricci G; Ursino M
    J Integr Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 20(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 33834687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.