These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37520606)

  • 21. Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Models for the Detection of Early Esophageal Cancers in Barret's Esophagus: A Meta-Analysis of Patient-Based Studies.
    Bhatti KM; Khanzada ZS; Kuzman M; Ali SM; Iftikhar SY; Small P
    Cureus; 2021 Jun; 13(6):e15447. PubMed ID: 34258114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of cephalometric measurements between conventional and automatic cephalometric analysis using convolutional neural network.
    Jeon S; Lee KC
    Prog Orthod; 2021 May; 22(1):14. PubMed ID: 34056670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
    Leonardi RM; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Greco M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fully automated identification of cephalometric landmarks for upper airway assessment using cascaded convolutional neural networks.
    Yoon HJ; Kim DR; Gwon E; Kim N; Baek SH; Ahn HW; Kim KA; Kim SJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 Jan; 44(1):66-77. PubMed ID: 34379120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy and reliability of automatic three-dimensional cephalometric landmarking.
    Dot G; Rafflenbeul F; Arbotto M; Gajny L; Rouch P; Schouman T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Oct; 49(10):1367-1378. PubMed ID: 32169306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ceph-Net: automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on scanned lateral cephalograms from children and adolescents using an attention-based stacked regression network.
    Yang S; Song ES; Lee ES; Kang SR; Yi WJ; Lee SP
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):803. PubMed ID: 37884918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A fully deep learning model for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    Kim YH; Lee C; Ha EG; Choi YJ; Han SS
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Sep; 51(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 34621657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Artificial intelligence system for automated landmark localization and analysis of cephalometry.
    Jiang F; Guo Y; Yang C; Zhou Y; Lin Y; Cheng F; Quan S; Feng Q; Li J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Jan; 52(1):20220081. PubMed ID: 36279185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks:
    Park JH; Hwang HW; Moon JH; Yu Y; Kim H; Her SB; Srinivasan G; Aljanabi MNA; Donatelli RE; Lee SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Nov; 89(6):903-909. PubMed ID: 31282738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Preciseness of artificial intelligence for lateral cephalometric measurements.
    El-Dawlatly M; Attia KH; Abdelghaffar AY; Mostafa YA; Abd El-Ghafour M
    J Orofac Orthop; 2024 May; 85(Suppl 1):27-33. PubMed ID: 36894679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance and Limitation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: Meta-analysis.
    Wu JH; Liu TYA; Hsu WT; Ho JH; Lee CC
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jul; 23(7):e23863. PubMed ID: 34407500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Automatic identification of posteroanterior cephalometric landmarks using a novel deep learning algorithm: a comparative study with human experts.
    Lee H; Cho JM; Ryu S; Ryu S; Chang E; Jung YS; Kim JY
    Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):15506. PubMed ID: 37726392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Performance of a Convolutional Neural Network- Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Detection.
    Uğurlu M
    Turk J Orthod; 2022 Jun; 35(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 35788433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is automatic cephalometric software using artificial intelligence better than orthodontist experts in landmark identification?
    Ye H; Cheng Z; Ungvijanpunya N; Chen W; Cao L; Gou Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):467. PubMed ID: 37422630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Web-based fully automated cephalometric analysis by deep learning.
    Kim H; Shim E; Park J; Kim YJ; Lee U; Kim Y
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 194():105513. PubMed ID: 32403052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. DEEP LEARNING ALGORITHMS HAVE HIGH ACCURACY FOR AUTOMATED LANDMARK DETECTION ON 2D LATERAL CEPHALOGRAMS.
    Cao L; He H; Hua F
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2022 Dec; 22(4):101798. PubMed ID: 36494109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 3D cephalometric analysis obtained from computed tomography. Review of the literature.
    Rossini G; Cavallini C; Cassetta M; Barbato E
    Ann Stomatol (Roma); 2011 Mar; 2(3-4):31-9. PubMed ID: 22545187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effectiveness of Human-Artificial Intelligence Collaboration in Cephalometric Landmark Detection.
    Le VNT; Kang J; Oh IS; Kim JG; Yang YM; Lee DW
    J Pers Med; 2022 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35330386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cascaded convolutional networks for automatic cephalometric landmark detection.
    Zeng M; Yan Z; Liu S; Zhou Y; Qiu L
    Med Image Anal; 2021 Feb; 68():101904. PubMed ID: 33290934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Frontal cephalometric landmarking: humans vs artificial neural networks.
    Muraev AA; Tsai P; Kibardin I; Oborotistov N; Shirayeva T; Ivanov S; Ivanov S; Guseynov N; Aleshina O; Bosykh Y; Safyanova E; Andreischev A; Rudoman S; Dolgalev A; Matyuta M; Karagodsky V; Tuturov N
    Int J Comput Dent; 2020; 23(2):139-148. PubMed ID: 32555767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.