These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

30 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37521148)

  • 1. Accuracy Validation of the New Barrett True Axial Length Formula and the Optimized Lens Factor Using Sum-of-Segment Biometry.
    Miyamoto S; Kamiya K
    J Clin Med; 2024 Aug; 13(16):. PubMed ID: 39200782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Refractive Predictability and Biometry Agreement of a Combined Swept Source Optical Coherence and Reflectometry Biometer Compared to an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer and an SS-OCT Biometer.
    Gjerdrum B; Gundersen KG; Nilsen C; Gundersen M; Jensen P
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():1439-1452. PubMed ID: 37251985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized Trial Comparing Prediction Accuracy of Two Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometers.
    Multack S; Plummer N; Smits G; Hall B
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():2423-2428. PubMed ID: 37609646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Hoffer KJ; Hoffmann PC; Savini G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1165-72. PubMed ID: 27531293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing Predictive Accuracy of a Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer and an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer.
    Blehm C; Hall B
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():2125-2131. PubMed ID: 37521148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of IOL Power Calculation Formulas for Quadrifocal Acrysof IQ PanOptix TFNT Implantation in Patients With Previous Corneal Refractive Surgery: Comparison of SS-OCT-Based Biometers.
    Choi JY; Choi A; Kwon H; Jeon S
    J Refract Surg; 2021 Dec; 37(12):836-841. PubMed ID: 34914552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Precision of a New Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomographer and Its Comparison With a Swept-Source OCT-Based Optical Biometer in Patients With Cataract.
    Wang Q; Chen M; Ning R; Savini G; Wang Y; Zhang T; Lin X; Chen X; Huang J
    J Refract Surg; 2021 Sep; 37(9):616-622. PubMed ID: 34506238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies.
    Montés-Micó R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Jan; 48(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 34091551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ocular biometry with swept-source optical coherence tomography.
    Montés-Micó R; Pastor-Pascual F; Ruiz-Mesa R; Tañá-Rivero P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Jun; 47(6):802-814. PubMed ID: 33315731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Analysis of Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography and Partial Coherence Interferometry Biometers in the Prediction of Cataract Surgery Refractive Outcomes.
    Cummings AB; Naughton S; Coen AM; Brennan E; Kelly GE
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2020; 14():4209-4220. PubMed ID: 33293790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability of biometry measured by three devices and its impact on predicted intraocular lens power.
    Shetty N; Kaweri L; Koshy A; Shetty R; Nuijts RMMA; Sinha Roy A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 May; 47(5):585-592. PubMed ID: 33252565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry and Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometry Devices in Dense Cataracts.
    Vasavada SA; Patel P; Vaishnav VR; Ashena Z; Srivastava S; Vasavada V; Nanavaty MA
    J Refract Surg; 2020 Aug; 36(8):557-564. PubMed ID: 32785730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Ocular Biometry and Refractive Outcomes Using IOL Master 500, IOL Master 700, and Lenstar LS900.
    Song JS; Yoon DY; Hyon JY; Jeon HS
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 34(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 32233146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer.
    Yang CM; Lim DH; Kim HJ; Chung TY
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223114. PubMed ID: 31603903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction Accuracy of Total Keratometry Compared to Standard Keratometry Using Different Intraocular Lens Power Formulas.
    Fabian E; Wehner W
    J Refract Surg; 2019 Jun; 35(6):362-368. PubMed ID: 31185101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices.
    Omoto MK; Torii H; Masui S; Ayaki M; Tsubota K; Negishi K
    Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):6557. PubMed ID: 31024017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical Evaluation of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Biometer That Uses Individual Refractive Indices to Measure Axial Length in Cataract Patients.
    Tamaoki A; Kojima T; Hasegawa A; Yamamoto M; Kaga T; Tanaka K; Ichikawa K
    Ophthalmic Res; 2019; 62(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 30889604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.