107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37522365)
1. Robot-assisted minimally invasive liver surgery in elderly patients: A single-centre, propensity score- matched study.
Fukumori D; Tschuor C; Penninga L; Hillingsø J; Svendsen LB; Larsen PN
Int J Med Robot; 2023 Jul; ():e2556. PubMed ID: 37522365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for complex hepatolithiasis: a propensity score matching analysis.
Shu J; Wang XJ; Li JW; Bie P; Chen J; Zheng SG
Surg Endosc; 2019 Aug; 33(8):2539-2547. PubMed ID: 30350102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy and safety of robotic liver surgery for the elderly: A propensity-score matched analysis of short-term outcomes with open liver surgery at a single center in Denmark.
Fukumori D; Tschuor C; Hamada T; Penninga L; Hillingsø J; Svendsen LB; Nørgaard Larsen P
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38866728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown's esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive approaches.
Kulkarni A; Mulchandani JG; Sadat MS; Shetty N; Shetty S; Kumar MP; Kudari A
J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1289-1297. PubMed ID: 35044671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
He H; Wu Q; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Chen N; Fu J; Zhang G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 29792203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy.
Kim HS; Kim H; Kwon W; Han Y; Byun Y; Kang JS; Choi YJ; Jang JY
Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1675-1681. PubMed ID: 32277354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ROBOT-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy in 300 consecutive cases: Annual trend analysis and propensity score-matched comparison of perioperative and long-term oncologic outcomes with the open method.
Kim HS; Kim H; Han Y; Lee M; Kang YH; Sohn HJ; Kang JS; Kwon W; Jang JY
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2022 Mar; 29(3):301-310. PubMed ID: 34689430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive versus open right hepatectomy: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis.
Duarte VC; Coelho FF; Valverde A; Danoussou D; Kruger JAP; Zuber K; Fonseca GM; Jeismann VB; Herman P; Lupinacci RM
BMC Surg; 2020 Oct; 20(1):260. PubMed ID: 33126885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic liver resection for cavernous hemangioma: a propensity score matching study.
Zhang W; Liu J; Zhang Z; Wang Y; Xiang S; Chen L; Zhu P; Zhang W; Shu C; Lau WY; Zhang B; Chen X
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4505-4516. PubMed ID: 36810688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive treatment of colorectal liver metastases: does robotic surgery provide any technical advantages over laparoscopy? A multicenter analysis from the IGoMILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) registry.
Masetti M; Fallani G; Ratti F; Ferrero A; Giuliante F; Cillo U; Guglielmi A; Ettorre GM; Torzilli G; Vincenti L; Ercolani G; Cipressi C; Lombardi R; Aldrighetti L; Jovine E
Updates Surg; 2022 Apr; 74(2):535-545. PubMed ID: 35099776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison.
Montalti R; Scuderi V; Patriti A; Vivarelli M; Troisi RI
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):1004-13. PubMed ID: 26123328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic versus open oncological gastric surgery in the elderly: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Garbarino GM; Costa G; Frezza B; Biancafarina A; Balducci G; Mercantini P; De Prizio M; Laracca GG; Ceccarelli G
J Robot Surg; 2021 Oct; 15(5):741-749. PubMed ID: 33151485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.
Babic B; Müller DT; Jung JO; Schiffmann LM; Grisar P; Schmidt T; Chon SH; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7747-7755. PubMed ID: 35505259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Benign Tumors and Lesions: A Case Matched Study with Propensity Score Matching.
Wabitsch S; Kästner A; Haber PK; Benzing C; Krenzien F; Andreou A; Kamali C; Lenz K; Pratschke J; Schmelzle M
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Dec; 29(12):1518-1525. PubMed ID: 31670608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-assisted esophagectomy may improve perioperative outcome in patients with esophageal cancer - a single-center experience.
Betzler J; Elfinger L; Büttner S; Weiß C; Rahbari N; Betzler A; Reißfelder C; Otto M; Blank S; Schölch S
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():966321. PubMed ID: 36059666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does metabolic syndrome affect perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic hepatectomy? A propensity score-matched analysis.
Jacoby H; Sucandy I; Ross S; Crespo K; Syblis C; App S; Rosemurgy A
Surg Endosc; 2023 Aug; 37(8):6379-6384. PubMed ID: 37038021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer with liver metastasis: a comparison with open surgery.
Li J; Xi H; Cui J; Zhang K; Gao Y; Liang W; Cai A; Wei B; Chen L
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1422-1433. PubMed ID: 29075971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis of 224 patients.
Wong KC; Lee KF; Lo EYJ; Fung AKY; Lok HT; Cheung SYS; Ng KKC; Wong J; Lai PBS; Chong CCN
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Mar; 408(1):118. PubMed ID: 36917309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical feasibility and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic isolated caudate lobe resection: an IgoMILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) registry-based study.
Ruzzenente A; Ciangherotti A; Aldrighetti L; Ettorre GM; De Carlis L; Ferrero A; Dalla Valle R; Tisone G; Guglielmi A;
Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1490-1499. PubMed ID: 33788031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
