These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37523571)

  • 1. No association between numerical ability and politically motivated reasoning in a large US probability sample.
    Stagnaro MN; Tappin BM; Rand DG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Aug; 120(32):e2301491120. PubMed ID: 37523571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. COVID-19 and Politically Motivated Reasoning.
    Maguire A; Persson E; Västfjäll D; Tinghög G
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Nov; 42(8):1078-1086. PubMed ID: 35993415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rethinking the link between cognitive sophistication and politically motivated reasoning.
    Tappin BM; Pennycook G; Rand DG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Jun; 150(6):1095-1114. PubMed ID: 33119359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.
    Pennycook G; Rand DG
    Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():39-50. PubMed ID: 29935897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A preregistered replication of motivated numeracy.
    Persson E; Andersson D; Koppel L; Västfjäll D; Tinghög G
    Cognition; 2021 Sep; 214():104768. PubMed ID: 34051421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. It depends: Partisan evaluation of conditional probability importance.
    Van Boven L; Ramos J; Montal-Rosenberg R; Kogut T; Sherman DK; Slovic P
    Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():51-63. PubMed ID: 30833009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Politics, moral reasoning and the Defining Issues Test: a reply to Barnett et al. (1995).
    Emler N; Palmer-Canton E; St James A
    Br J Soc Psychol; 1998 Dec; 37 ( Pt 4)():457-76. PubMed ID: 9933911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample.
    Ecker UKH; Sze BKN; Andreotta M
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Apr; 376(1822):20200145. PubMed ID: 33612006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Partisan-motivated sampling: Re-examining politically motivated reasoning across the information processing stream.
    Derreumaux Y; Bergh R; Hughes BL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Aug; 123(2):316-336. PubMed ID: 35420863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biased belief updating in causal reasoning about COVID-19.
    Gugerty L; Shreeves M; Dumessa N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Dec; 27(4):695-721. PubMed ID: 35073132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Science beliefs, political ideology, and cognitive sophistication.
    Pennycook G; Bago B; McPhetres J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jan; 152(1):80-97. PubMed ID: 35925740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Psychology of Fake News.
    Pennycook G; Rand DG
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 25(5):388-402. PubMed ID: 33736957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural bases of motivated reasoning: an FMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential election.
    Westen D; Blagov PS; Harenski K; Kilts C; Hamann S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 18(11):1947-58. PubMed ID: 17069484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identity-motivated reasoning: Biased judgments regarding political leaders and their actions.
    Arieli S; Amit A; Mentser S
    Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():64-73. PubMed ID: 30579612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Public political thought: bridging the sociological-philosophical divide in the study of legitimacy.
    Abulof U
    Br J Sociol; 2016 Jun; 67(2):371-91. PubMed ID: 27230593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A belief systems analysis of fraud beliefs following the 2020 US election.
    Botvinik-Nezer R; Jones M; Wager TD
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Jul; 7(7):1106-1119. PubMed ID: 37037989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics.
    Drummond C; Fischhoff B
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Sep; 114(36):9587-9592. PubMed ID: 28827344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Epistemic beliefs' role in promoting misperceptions and conspiracist ideation.
    Garrett RK; Weeks BE
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184733. PubMed ID: 28922387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
    Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.