These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37523955)

  • 1. Credibility assessment of computational models according to ASME V&V40: Application to the Bologna Biomechanical Computed Tomography solution.
    Aldieri A; Curreli C; Szyszko JA; La Mattina AA; Viceconti M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Oct; 240():107727. PubMed ID: 37523955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design and execution of a verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification plan for a numerical model of left ventricular flow after LVAD implantation.
    Santiago A; Butakoff C; Eguzkitza B; Gray RA; May-Newman K; Pathmanathan P; Vu V; Vázquez M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Jun; 18(6):e1010141. PubMed ID: 35696442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Credibility assessment of patient-specific biomechanical models to investigate proximal junctional failure in clinical cases with adult spine deformity using ASME V&V40 standard.
    Lopez Poncelas M; La Barbera L; Rawlinson JJ; Crandall D; Aubin CE
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Apr; 25(5):543-553. PubMed ID: 34427119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In silico trials: Verification, validation and uncertainty quantification of predictive models used in the regulatory evaluation of biomedical products.
    Viceconti M; Pappalardo F; Rodriguez B; Horner M; Bischoff J; Musuamba Tshinanu F
    Methods; 2021 Jan; 185():120-127. PubMed ID: 31991193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Critical Comparison of Comparators Used to Demonstrate Credibility of Physics-Based Numerical Spine Models.
    Stott B; Afshari P; Bischoff J; Clin J; Francois-Saint-Cyr A; Goodin M; Herrmann S; Liu X; Driscoll M
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Jan; 51(1):150-162. PubMed ID: 36088433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Credibility assessment of patient-specific computational modeling using patient-specific cardiac modeling as an exemplar.
    Galappaththige S; Gray RA; Costa CM; Niederer S; Pathmanathan P
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Oct; 18(10):e1010541. PubMed ID: 36215228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Credibility Assessment Plan for an In Silico Model that Predicts the Dose-Response Relationship of New Tuberculosis Treatments.
    Curreli C; Di Salvatore V; Russo G; Pappalardo F; Viceconti M
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Jan; 51(1):200-210. PubMed ID: 36115895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applicability analysis to evaluate credibility of an in silico thrombectomy procedure.
    Luraghi G; Bridio S; Miller C; Hoekstra A; Rodriguez Matas JF; Migliavacca F
    J Biomech; 2021 Sep; 126():110631. PubMed ID: 34298293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing Computational Model Credibility Using a Risk-Based Framework: Application to Hemolysis in Centrifugal Blood Pumps.
    Morrison TM; Hariharan P; Funkhouser CM; Afshari P; Goodin M; Horner M
    ASAIO J; 2019; 65(4):349-360. PubMed ID: 30973403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Verification and Validation of Computational Models Used in Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing: Potential Application of the ASME Verification and Validation 40 Standard and FDA Proposed AI/ML Model Life Cycle Management Framework.
    Bideault G; Scaccia A; Zahel T; Landertinger RW; Daluwatte C
    J Pharm Sci; 2021 Apr; 110(4):1540-1544. PubMed ID: 33493480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Model verification tools: a computational framework for verification assessment of mechanistic agent-based models.
    Russo G; Parasiliti Palumbo GA; Pennisi M; Pappalardo F
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 May; 22(Suppl 14):626. PubMed ID: 35590242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consideration of a Credibility Assessment Framework in Model-Informed Drug Development: Potential Application to Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation.
    Kuemmel C; Yang Y; Zhang X; Florian J; Zhu H; Tegenge M; Huang SM; Wang Y; Morrison T; Zineh I
    CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol; 2020 Jan; 9(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 31652029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comprehensive Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis for Cardiac Action Potential Models.
    Pathmanathan P; Cordeiro JM; Gray RA
    Front Physiol; 2019; 10():721. PubMed ID: 31297060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Applicability assessment for in-silico patient-specific TEVAR procedures.
    Ramella A; Migliavacca F; Rodriguez Matas JF; Mandigers TJ; Bissacco D; Domanin M; Trimarchi S; Luraghi G
    J Biomech; 2023 Jan; 146():111423. PubMed ID: 36584506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    Jose J; S S; Mathew B; Parambi DGT
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2022; 25(12):1991-2000. PubMed ID: 34986768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to Validate
    Berti F; Antonini L; Poletti G; Fiuza C; Vaughan TJ; Migliavacca F; Petrini L; Pennati G
    Front Med Technol; 2021; 3():702656. PubMed ID: 35047942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter-Laboratory Characterization of the Velocity Field in the FDA Blood Pump Model Using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV).
    Hariharan P; Aycock KI; Buesen M; Day SW; Good BC; Herbertson LH; Steinseifer U; Manning KB; Craven BA; Malinauskas RA
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):623-640. PubMed ID: 30291585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of the FDA nozzle model to illustrate validation techniques in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations.
    Hariharan P; D'Souza GA; Horner M; Morrison TM; Malinauskas RA; Myers MR
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178749. PubMed ID: 28594889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ensuring reliability of safety-critical clinical applications of computational cardiac models.
    Pathmanathan P; Gray RA
    Front Physiol; 2013; 4():358. PubMed ID: 24376423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.