138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37524087)
1. Per-fraction planning to enhance optimization degrees of freedom compared to the conventional single-plan approach.
Rossi L; Breedveld S; Heijmen B
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Aug; 68(17):. PubMed ID: 37524087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. On the beam direction search space in computerized non-coplanar beam angle optimization for IMRT-prostate SBRT.
Rossi L; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJ; Voet PW; Lanconelli N; Aluwini S
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 57(17):5441-58. PubMed ID: 22864234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complementing Prostate SBRT VMAT With a Two-Beam Non-Coplanar IMRT Class Solution to Enhance Rectum and Bladder Sparing With Minimum Increase in Treatment Time.
Sharfo AWM; Rossi L; Dirkx MLP; Breedveld S; Aluwini S; Heijmen BJM
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():620978. PubMed ID: 33816253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated generation of IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients with metal hip prostheses: comparison of different planning strategies.
Voet PW; Dirkx ML; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJ
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071704. PubMed ID: 23822408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of OAR dose sparing and plan robustness of beam-specific PTV in lung cancer IMRT treatment.
Chang Y; Xiao F; Quan H; Yang Z
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Oct; 15(1):241. PubMed ID: 33069253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric comparison of two treatment planning systems for spine SBRT.
Lee YK; Munawar I; Mashouf S; Sahgal A; Ruschin M
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 31376988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conical beam geometry intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Schüler E; Wang L; Loo BW; Maxim PG
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 64(12):125014. PubMed ID: 31125980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. First fully automated planning solution for robotic radiosurgery - comparison with automatically planned volumetric arc therapy for prostate cancer.
Rossi L; Sharfo AW; Aluwini S; Dirkx M; Breedveld S; Heijmen B
Acta Oncol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):1490-1498. PubMed ID: 29966472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated non-coplanar beam direction optimization improves IMRT in SBRT of liver metastasis.
de Pooter JA; Méndez Romero A; Wunderink W; Storchi PR; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Sep; 88(3):376-81. PubMed ID: 18585809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fraction-variant beam orientation optimization for non-coplanar IMRT.
O'Connor D; Yu V; Nguyen D; Ruan D; Sheng K
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045015. PubMed ID: 29351088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. TBS-BAO: fully automated beam angle optimization for IMRT guided by a total-beam-space reference plan.
Schipaanboord BWK; Heijmen BJM; Breedveld S
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Jan; 67(3):. PubMed ID: 35026742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.
Tran A; Zhang J; Woods K; Yu V; Nguyen D; Gustafson G; Rosen L; Sheng K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 28077128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical Assessment of an Automated Treatment Planning on Dose Escalation of Pancreas Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.
Wang S; Zheng D; Lin C; Lei Y; Verma V; Smith A; Ma R; Enke CA; Zhou S
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 18():1533033819851520. PubMed ID: 31195891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Potential reduction of lung dose via VMAT with jaw tracking in the treatment of single-isocenter/two-lesion lung SBRT.
Pokhrel D; Sanford L; Halfman M; Molloy J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 May; 20(5):55-63. PubMed ID: 30955251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and non-coplanar intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer.
Jeong Y; Lee SW; Kwak J; Cho I; Yoon SM; Kim JH; Park JH; Choi EK; Song SY; Kim YS; Kim SS; Joo JH; Ahn SD
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Aug; 9():193. PubMed ID: 25175383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. VMAT plus a few computer-optimized non-coplanar IMRT beams (VMAT+) tested for liver SBRT.
Sharfo AW; Dirkx ML; Breedveld S; Méndez Romero A; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2017 Apr; 123(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 28341061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric impact of different CT datasets for stereotactic treatment planning using 3D conformal radiotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Oechsner M; Odersky L; Berndt J; Combs SE; Wilkens JJ; Duma MN
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Dec; 10():249. PubMed ID: 26626865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A treatment planning study comparing IMRT techniques and cyber knife for stereotactic body radiotherapy of low-risk prostate carcinoma.
Scobioala S; Kittel C; Elsayad K; Kroeger K; Oertel M; Samhouri L; Haverkamp U; Eich HT
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 14(1):143. PubMed ID: 31399115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
