These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37525421)

  • 21. Robotic Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.
    Hellan M; Ouellette J; Lagares-Garcia JA; Rauh SM; Kennedy HL; Nicholson JD; Nesbitt D; Johnson CS; Pigazzi A
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):2151-8. PubMed ID: 25487966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].
    Liu HC; Li C; Zhang F; Wang XS; Zhang C; Luo HX; Song J; Yu PW; Tang B
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 31874529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does prolonged operative time impact postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing robotic-assisted rectal resection for cancer?
    Duchalais E; Machairas N; Kelley SR; Landmann RG; Merchea A; Colibaseanu DT; Mathis KL; Dozois EJ; Larson DW
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3659-3666. PubMed ID: 29546672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis in Experienced Centers.
    Burghgraef TA; Crolla RMPH; Verheijen PM; Fahim M; van Geloven A; Leijtens JWA; Pronk A; Smits AB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2022 Feb; 65(2):218-227. PubMed ID: 34459449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The robotic learning curve for a newly appointed colorectal surgeon.
    Saqib SU; Raza MZ; Evans C; Bajwa AA
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Feb; 17(1):73-78. PubMed ID: 35325433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the short-term efficacy of two types of robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Lei Y; Jiang J; Zhu S; Yi B; Li J
    Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Jan; 26(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 34846614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
    de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopy and multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for robotic surgery.
    Kuo LJ; Lin YK; Chang CC; Tai CJ; Chiou JF; Chang YJ
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 May; 29(5):555-62. PubMed ID: 24562546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multidimensional analyses of the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 3-phase learning process comparison.
    Park EJ; Kim CW; Cho MS; Baik SH; Kim DW; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Oct; 28(10):2821-31. PubMed ID: 24902812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is robotic da Vinci Xi® superior to the da Vinci Si® for sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision? Outcomes in 150 mid-low rectal cancer patients.
    Aliyev V; Arslan NC; Goksoy B; Guven K; Goksel S; Asoglu O
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1339-1346. PubMed ID: 35107708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing the learning curve of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: a multicenter study considering procedural safety, pathological safety, and efficiency.
    Burghgraef TA; Sikkenk DJ; Crolla RMPH; Fahim M; Melenhorst J; Moumni ME; Schelling GV; Smits AB; Stassen LPS; Verheijen PM; Consten ECJ
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Jan; 38(1):9. PubMed ID: 36630001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The robotic colorectal experience: an outcomes and learning curve analysis of 502 patients.
    Parascandola SA; Horsey ML; Hota S; Paull JO; Graham A; Pudalov N; Smith S; Amdur R; Obias V
    Colorectal Dis; 2021 Jan; 23(1):226-236. PubMed ID: 33048409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.
    D'Annibale A; Pernazza G; Monsellato I; Pende V; Lucandri G; Mazzocchi P; Alfano G
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Jun; 27(6):1887-95. PubMed ID: 23292566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robotic rectal resection for cancer: a prospective cohort study to analyze surgical, clinical and oncological outcomes.
    Parisi A; Desiderio J; Trastulli S; Cirocchi R; Ricci F; Farinacci F; Mangia A; Boselli C; Noya G; Filippini A; D'Andrea V; Santoro A
    Int J Surg; 2014 Dec; 12(12):1456-61. PubMed ID: 25463766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of short-term outcomes.
    Hol JC; Burghgraef TA; Rutgers MLW; Crolla RMPH; van Geloven NAW; Hompes R; Leijtens JWA; Polat F; Pronk A; Smits AB; Tuynman JB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ; Sietses C
    Br J Surg; 2021 Nov; 108(11):1380-1387. PubMed ID: 34370834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
    Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Exploring and adjusting for potential learning effects in ROLARR: a randomised controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection.
    Corrigan N; Marshall H; Croft J; Copeland J; Jayne D; Brown J
    Trials; 2018 Jun; 19(1):339. PubMed ID: 29945673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: use of the cumulative sum method.
    Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Sato S; Yamakawa Y; Kagawa H; Tomioka H; Mori K
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Jul; 29(7):1679-85. PubMed ID: 25277477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surgical outcomes of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery using the da Vinci Surgical System: a multi-center pilot Phase II study.
    Tsukamoto S; Nishizawa Y; Ochiai H; Tsukada Y; Sasaki T; Shida D; Ito M; Kanemitsu Y
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2017 Dec; 47(12):1135-1140. PubMed ID: 29036613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Transition from laparoscopic to robotic rectal resection: outcomes and learning curve of the initial 100 cases.
    Olthof PB; Giesen LJX; Vijfvinkel TS; Roos D; Dekker JWT
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):2921-2927. PubMed ID: 32556694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.