200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37525436)
1. Accounting for nonmonotone missing data using inverse probability weighting.
Ross RK; Cole SR; Edwards JK; Westreich D; Daniels JL; Stringer JSA
Stat Med; 2023 Oct; 42(23):4282-4298. PubMed ID: 37525436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On Inverse Probability Weighting for Nonmonotone Missing at Random Data.
Sun B; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ
J Am Stat Assoc; 2018; 113(521):369-379. PubMed ID: 30034062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation in Cox model with missing failure subtype.
Guo F; Langworthy B; Ogino S; Wang M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 Feb; 33(2):344-356. PubMed ID: 38262434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical inference for missing data mechanisms.
Zhao Y
Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(28):4325-4333. PubMed ID: 32815184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Missing Data in Marginal Structural Models: A Plasmode Simulation Study Comparing Multiple Imputation and Inverse Probability Weighting.
Liu SH; Chrysanthopoulou SA; Chang Q; Hunnicutt JN; Lapane KL
Med Care; 2019 Mar; 57(3):237-243. PubMed ID: 30664611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of multiple imputation approaches for handling missing covariate information in a case-cohort study with a binary outcome.
Middleton M; Nguyen C; Moreno-Betancur M; Carlin JB; Lee KJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):87. PubMed ID: 35369860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the use of multiple imputation to address data missing by design as well as unintended missing data in case-cohort studies with a binary endpoint.
Middleton M; Nguyen C; Carlin JB; Moreno-Betancur M; Lee KJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Dec; 23(1):287. PubMed ID: 38062377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Missing confounding data in marginal structural models: a comparison of inverse probability weighting and multiple imputation.
Moodie EE; Delaney JA; Lefebvre G; Platt RW
Int J Biostat; 2008; 4(1):Article 13. PubMed ID: 22462119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of statistical approaches for analyzing incomplete longitudinal patient-reported outcome data in randomized controlled trials.
Rombach I; Jenkinson C; Gray AM; Murray DW; Rivero-Arias O
Patient Relat Outcome Meas; 2018; 9():197-209. PubMed ID: 29950913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of predictive model performance of an existing model in the presence of missing data.
Li P; Taylor JMG; Spratt DE; Karnes RJ; Schipper MJ
Stat Med; 2021 Jul; 40(15):3477-3498. PubMed ID: 33843085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dealing with indeterminate outcomes in antimalarial drug efficacy trials: a comparison between complete case analysis, multiple imputation and inverse probability weighting.
Dahal P; Stepniewska K; Guerin PJ; D'Alessandro U; Price RN; Simpson JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):215. PubMed ID: 31775647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating population treatment effects from a survey subsample.
Rudolph KE; Díaz I; Rosenblum M; Stuart EA
Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 180(7):737-48. PubMed ID: 25190679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combining multiple imputation and inverse-probability weighting.
Seaman SR; White IR; Copas AJ; Li L
Biometrics; 2012 Mar; 68(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 22050039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Responsiveness-informed multiple imputation and inverse probability-weighting in cohort studies with missing data that are non-monotone or not missing at random.
Doidge JC
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):352-363. PubMed ID: 26984909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. HANDLING MISSING DATA BY DELETING COMPLETELY OBSERVED RECORDS.
Paik MC; Wang C
J Stat Plan Inference; 2009 Jul; 139(7):2341-2350. PubMed ID: 20160863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a weighting approach for performing sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation.
Rezvan PH; White IR; Lee KJ; Carlin JB; Simpson JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():83. PubMed ID: 26464305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correcting for dependent censoring in routine outcome monitoring data by applying the inverse probability censoring weighted estimator.
Willems S; Schat A; van Noorden MS; Fiocco M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):323-335. PubMed ID: 26988930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data.
Seaman SR; White IR
Stat Methods Med Res; 2013 Jun; 22(3):278-95. PubMed ID: 21220355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in longitudinal studies with sampling weights: Comparison of methods implemented in Stata.
De Silva AP; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Moreno-Betancur M; Simpson JA
Biom J; 2021 Feb; 63(2):354-371. PubMed ID: 33103307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
