168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37525535)
21. A 17-gene assay to predict prostate cancer aggressiveness in the context of Gleason grade heterogeneity, tumor multifocality, and biopsy undersampling.
Klein EA; Cooperberg MR; Magi-Galluzzi C; Simko JP; Falzarano SM; Maddala T; Chan JM; Li J; Cowan JE; Tsiatis AC; Cherbavaz DB; Pelham RJ; Tenggara-Hunter I; Baehner FL; Knezevic D; Febbo PG; Shak S; Kattan MW; Lee M; Carroll PR
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):550-60. PubMed ID: 24836057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Biopsy-based 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score as a Predictor of Metastases and Prostate Cancer Death in Surgically Treated Men with Clinically Localized Disease.
Van Den Eeden SK; Lu R; Zhang N; Quesenberry CP; Shan J; Han JS; Tsiatis AC; Leimpeter AD; Lawrence HJ; Febbo PG; Presti JC
Eur Urol; 2018 Jan; 73(1):129-138. PubMed ID: 28988753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Utilization of a Genomic Classifier for Prediction of Metastasis Following Salvage Radiation Therapy after Radical Prostatectomy.
Freedland SJ; Choeurng V; Howard L; De Hoedt A; du Plessis M; Yousefi K; Lam LL; Buerki C; Ra S; Robbins B; Trabulsi EJ; Shah NL; Abdollah F; Feng FY; Davicioni E; Dicker AP; Karnes RJ; Den RB
Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):588-596. PubMed ID: 26806658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Genomic Classifier Performance in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results From NRG Oncology/RTOG 0126 Randomized Phase 3 Trial.
Spratt DE; Liu VYT; Michalski J; Davicioni E; Berlin A; Simko JP; Efstathiou JA; Tran PT; Sandler HM; Hall WA; Thompson DJS; Parliament MB; Dayes IS; Correa RJM; Robertson JM; Gore EM; Doncals DE; Vigneault E; Souhami L; Karrison TG; Feng FY
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2023 Oct; 117(2):370-377. PubMed ID: 37137444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier Relates More Strongly to Gleason Grade Group Than Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies.
Martin DT; Ghabili K; Levi A; Humphrey PA; Sprenkle PC
Urology; 2019 Mar; 125():64-72. PubMed ID: 30552940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial: VA/NCI/AHRQ Cooperative Studies Program #407 (PIVOT): design and baseline results of a randomized controlled trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting for men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Wilt TJ
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2012 Dec; 2012(45):184-90. PubMed ID: 23271771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. African American Race is Not Associated with Risk of Reclassification during Active Surveillance: Results from the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study.
Schenk JM; Newcomb LF; Zheng Y; Faino AV; Zhu K; Nyame YA; Brooks JD; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Dash A; Filson CP; Gleave ME; Liss M; Martin FM; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Lin DW
J Urol; 2020 Apr; 203(4):727-733. PubMed ID: 31651227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Analysis of a Biopsy-Based Genomic Classifier in High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Meta-Analysis of the NRG Oncology/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9202, 9413, and 9902 Phase 3 Randomized Trials.
Nguyen PL; Huang HR; Spratt DE; Davicioni E; Sandler HM; Shipley WU; Efstathiou JA; Simko JP; Pollack A; Dicker AP; Roach M; Rosenthal SA; Zeitzer KL; Mendez LC; Hartford AC; Hall WA; Desai AB; Rabinovitch RA; Peters CA; Rodgers JP; Tran P; Feng FY
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2023 Jul; 116(3):521-529. PubMed ID: 36596347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score assay as a predictor of biochemical recurrence in men with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer.
Helfand BT; Paterakos M; Wang CH; Talaty P; Abran J; Bennett J; Hall DW; Lehman A; Aboushwareb T
PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0273782. PubMed ID: 36048818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Factors associated with initial treatment and survival for clinically localized prostate cancer: results from the CDC-NPCR Patterns of Care Study (PoC1).
Schymura MJ; Kahn AR; German RR; Hsieh MC; Cress RD; Finch JL; Fulton JP; Shen T; Stuckart E
BMC Cancer; 2010 Apr; 10():152. PubMed ID: 20403178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of the Decipher Test for Predicting Distant Metastatic Recurrence in Men with High-risk Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer 10 Years After Surgery.
Van den Broeck T; Moris L; Gevaert T; Tosco L; Smeets E; Fishbane N; Liu Y; Helsen C; Margrave J; Buerki C; Davicioni E; Van Poppel H; Everaerts W; Weinmann S; Den R; Davis J; Schaeffer E; Karnes RJ; Claessens F; Joniau S
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 2(5):589-596. PubMed ID: 31411980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Tumor Volume on Biopsy of Low Risk Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance.
Tosoian JJ; Mamawala M; Patel HD; Alam R; Epstein JI; Ross AE; Carter HB
J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):954-960. PubMed ID: 29074222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Contemporary Management of Prostate Cancer Patients Suitable for Active Surveillance: A North American Population-based Study.
Moschini M; Fossati N; Sood A; Lee JK; Sammon J; Sun M; Pucheril D; Dalela D; Montorsi F; Karnes RJ; Briganti A; Trinh QD; Menon M; Abdollah F
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Jan; 4(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 28753764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. How Active is Active Surveillance? Intensity of Followup during Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in the United States.
Loeb S; Walter D; Curnyn C; Gold HT; Lepor H; Makarov DV
J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):721-6. PubMed ID: 26946161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Older Age Predicts Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Grade Reclassification to Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Men on Active Surveillance.
Druskin SC; Mamawala M; Tosoian JJ; Epstein JI; Pavlovich CP; Carter HB; Trock BJ
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 30114397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Molecular Analysis of Low Grade Prostate Cancer Using a Genomic Classifier of Metastatic Potential.
Klein EA; Santiago-Jiménez M; Yousefi K; Robbins BA; Schaeffer EM; Trock BJ; Tosoian J; Haddad Z; Ra S; Karnes RJ; Jenkins RB; Cheville JC; Den RB; Dicker AP; Davicioni E; Freedland SJ; Ross AE
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):122-128. PubMed ID: 27569435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Use and early mortality outcomes of active surveillance in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Butler SS; Mahal BA; Lamba N; Mossanen M; Martin NE; Mouw KW; Nguyen PL; Muralidhar V
Cancer; 2019 Sep; 125(18):3164-3171. PubMed ID: 31150125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Clinical Significance of Multiple Negative Surveillance Prostate Biopsies for Men on Active Surveillance-Does Cancer Vanish or Simply Hide?
Chu CE; Cowan JE; Fasulo V; Washington SL; de la Calle C; Shoemaker J; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2021 Jan; 205(1):109-114. PubMed ID: 33198555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
