158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37525728)
21. Cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty in severe varus osteoarthritis knee: A match-pair comparative study in an Asian population.
Soong J; Ou Yang Y; Ling ZM; Chia SL; Lo NN; Yeo SJ
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2021; 29(3):23094990211055224. PubMed ID: 34892980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cruciate Retaining compared with Posterior Stabilised Nexgen total knee arthroplasty: results at 10 years in a matched cohort.
Mayne A; Harshavardhan HP; Johnston LR; Wang W; Jariwala A
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2017 Nov; 99(8):602-606. PubMed ID: 28653546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of in vivo kinematics of total knee arthroplasty between cruciate retaining and cruciate substituting insert.
Iwamoto K; Yamazaki T; Sugamoto K; Tomita T
Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol; 2021 Oct; 26():47-52. PubMed ID: 34722162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. CR-lipped bearing is an adequate functional solution to patients with perioperative excessive laxity in cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.
Kalaai S; van Dun B; Boonen B; van Haaren EH; Schotanus MGM
Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():51-56. PubMed ID: 33307319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Functional Outcomes are Comparable Between Posterior Stabilized and Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty Designs at Short-Term Follow-up.
Yacovelli S; Grau LC; Hozack WJ; Courtney PM
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Mar; 36(3):986-990. PubMed ID: 32994108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with severe varus deformity.
Ünkar EA; Öztürkmen Y; Şükür E; Çarkçı E; Mert M
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Mar; 51(2):95-99. PubMed ID: 28108167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Functional outcome and range of motion of high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining and high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study.
Kim YH; Choi Y; Kwon OR; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Apr; 91(4):753-60. PubMed ID: 19339558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ultracongruent Designs Compared to Posterior-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Tibial Inserts - What Does the Evidence Tell Us? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Wenzel AN; Hasan SA; Chaudhry YP; Mekkawy KL; Oni JK; Khanuja HS
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2739-2749.e7. PubMed ID: 37276953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Li N; Tan Y; Deng Y; Chen L
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2014 Mar; 22(3):556-64. PubMed ID: 23117166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of joint laxity against distal traction force upon flexion in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.
Tsuneizumi Y; Suzuki M; Miyagi J; Tamai H; Tsukeoka T; Moriya H; Takahashi K
J Orthop Sci; 2008 Nov; 13(6):504-9. PubMed ID: 19089537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Better Flexion but Unaffected Satisfaction After Treatment With Posterior Stabilized Versus Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty - 2-year Results of a Prospective, Randomized Trial.
Tille E; Beyer F; Lützner C; Postler A; Lützner J
J Arthroplasty; 2024 Feb; 39(2):368-373. PubMed ID: 37598783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Modern Total Knee Arthroplasty Bearing Designs and the Role of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament.
Movassaghi K; Patel A; Ghulam-Jelani Z; Levine BR
Arthroplast Today; 2023 Jun; 21():101130. PubMed ID: 37151403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Progressive Tibial Bearing Sagittal Plane Conformity in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Meding JB; Meding LK; Meneghini RM; Malinzak RA
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Feb; 36(2):520-525. PubMed ID: 32873449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Higher Component Malposition Rates with Patient-Specific Cruciate Retaining TKA than Contemporary Posterior Stabilized TKA.
Kumar P; Elfrink J; Daniels JP; Aggarwal A; Keeney JA
J Knee Surg; 2021 Aug; 34(10):1085-1091. PubMed ID: 32018278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cruciate-substituting and posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasties had similar gait patterns in the short term.
Favroul C; Batailler C; Naaim A; Foissey C; Kafelov M; Cheze L; Servien E; Lustig S
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Dec; 31(12):5398-5406. PubMed ID: 37752347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intact, pie-crusting and repairing the posterior cruciate ligament in posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty: A 5-year follow-up.
Ma DS; Wen L; Wang ZW; Zhang B; Ren SX; Lin Y
World J Clin Cases; 2019 Dec; 7(24):4208-4217. PubMed ID: 31911901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Contact Kinematics in Posterior-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty at Long-Term Follow-Up.
Broberg JS; Ndoja S; MacDonald SJ; Lanting BA; Teeter MG
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jan; 35(1):272-277. PubMed ID: 31473060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparing cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty and cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: a prospective clinical study.
Wang CJ; Wang JW; Chen HS
Chang Gung Med J; 2004 Aug; 27(8):578-85. PubMed ID: 15553604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Impact of Patellar Position on Mediolateral Joint Gap in Cruciate-Retaining and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.
Park KT; Nam TS; Son DW; Lee JK; Ahn JH
J Arthroplasty; 2024 Apr; 39(4):884-890. PubMed ID: 37858710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retained implants for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.
Migliorini F; Eschweiler J; Tingart M; Rath B
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2019 May; 29(4):937-946. PubMed ID: 30649620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
