115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37525928)
1. Detection cost: A nonnegligible factor contributing to inhibition of return in the discrimination task under the cue-target paradigm.
Zhang M; Zu G; Wang A
Perception; 2023 Oct; 52(10):681-694. PubMed ID: 37525928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is Inhibition of Return Modulated by Involuntary Orienting of Spatial Attention: An ERP Study.
Pan F; Wu X; Zhang L
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():113. PubMed ID: 28197120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the costs and benefits of repeating a nonspatial feature in an exogenous spatial cuing paradigm.
Klein RM; Wang Y; Dukewich KR; He S; Hu K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2293-304. PubMed ID: 26153659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is "Inhibition of Return" due to the inhibition of the return of attention?
Martín-Arévalo E; Kingstone A; Lupiáñez J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(2):347-59. PubMed ID: 22928599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dissociating inhibition of return from endogenous orienting of spatial attention: Evidence from detection and discrimination tasks.
Chica AB; Lupianez J; Bartolomeo P
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2006 Oct; 23(7):1015-34. PubMed ID: 21049365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interaction between location- and frequency-based inhibition of return in human auditory system.
Chen Q; Zhang M; Zhou X
Exp Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 176(4):630-40. PubMed ID: 16917767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return.
Lupiáñez J; Milliken B; Solano C; Weaver B; Tipper SP
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Aug; 54(3):753-73. PubMed ID: 11548033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrophysiological evidence for inhibition of return effect in exogenous orienting.
Yang D; Yao S; Ding C; Qi S; Lei Y
Exp Brain Res; 2012 Sep; 221(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 22791229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The causal role of the left parietal lobe in facilitation and inhibition of return.
Martín-Arévalo E; Lupiáñez J; Narganes-Pineda C; Marino G; Colás I; Chica AB
Cortex; 2019 Aug; 117():311-322. PubMed ID: 31185374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does cue processing modulate inhibition of return in a detection task?
Zhou B; Yang T; Bao Y
Psych J; 2019 Mar; 8(1):158-164. PubMed ID: 30375191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Temporal expectancy modulates inhibition of return in a discrimination task.
Gabay S; Henik A
Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Feb; 17(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 20081160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrophysiological explorations of the cause and effect of inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm.
Tian Y; Klein RM; Satel J; Xu P; Yao D
Brain Topogr; 2011 Jun; 24(2):164-82. PubMed ID: 21365310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
Zhou X; Chen Q
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Temporal ambiguity of onsets in a cueing task prevents facilitation but not inhibition of return.
Malevich T; Ardasheva L; Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 29075992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of different directions of attentional shift on inhibition of return in three-dimensional space.
Wang A; Liu X; Chen Q; Zhang M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):838-47. PubMed ID: 26758976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set.
Bartolomeo P; Siéroff E; Decaix C; Chokron S
Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):432-44. PubMed ID: 11355388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of scene removal on inhibition of return in a cue-target task.
Redden RS; Klages J; Klein RM
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 27804031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Disentangling perceptual and motor components in inhibition of return.
Zhou B
Cogn Process; 2008 Aug; 9(3):175-87. PubMed ID: 18327623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of relevant and irrelevant color singletons on inhibition of return and attentional capture.
Ansorge U; Priess HW; Kerzel D
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1687-702. PubMed ID: 24027028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.
Lupiáñez J; Milán EG; Tornay FJ; Madrid E; Tudela P
Percept Psychophys; 1997 Nov; 59(8):1241-54. PubMed ID: 9401458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
