BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37526883)

  • 1. Comparative study of articaine 4% versus lidocaine 2% in the local anesthesia of permanent mandibular first molars affected by MIH: a randomized controlled trial.
    Haidar M; Raslan N
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2023 Oct; 24(5):621-630. PubMed ID: 37526883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lignocaine in root canal treatment of teeth with molar incisor hypomineralization.
    Thomas AM; George S; Anandaraj S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2023 Oct; 41(4):316-321. PubMed ID: 38235818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Articaine use does not routinely eliminate the need for palatal injections for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized cross-over clinical trial.
    Bahrololoomi Z; Maghsoudi N
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Dec; 26(4):603-611. PubMed ID: 34853915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vivo, randomized, controlled comparative evaluation of efficacy, hemodynamic changes, and postoperative complications of 4% articaine using buccal infiltration and 2% lidocaine using inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular primary molars of children aged 6 to 8 years.
    Khanna SR; Rao D; Panwar S; Ameen S
    Quintessence Int; 2021 Sep; 52(9):780-786. PubMed ID: 34076382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of Articaine versus Lidocaine in Supplemental Infiltration for Mandibular First versus Second Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.
    Shapiro MR; McDonald NJ; Gardner RJ; Peters MC; Botero TM
    J Endod; 2018 Apr; 44(4):523-528. PubMed ID: 29397214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Articaine Infiltration Versus Lidocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Anesthetizing Primary Mandibular Molars: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Study.
    Zhang IL; Kratunova E; Sha A; Marion I; da Fonseca MA; Han M
    Pediatr Dent; 2021 Sep; 43(5):344-348. PubMed ID: 34654493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Majid OW; Ahmed AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 76(4):737-743. PubMed ID: 29257943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine infiltration versus 2% lignocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for extraction of primary mandibular molars: A prospective, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial.
    Jain K; Katge F; Chimata VK; Patil D; Ghadge S; Bhanushali N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2021; 39(4):409-415. PubMed ID: 35102967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
    Berlin J; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 15716846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anesthetic Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration Articaine versus Lidocaine for Extraction of Primary Molar Teeth.
    Rathi NV; Khatri AA; Agrawal AG; M SB; Thosar NR; Deolia SG
    Anesth Prog; 2019; 66(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 30883236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar after an inferior alveolar nerve block.
    Haase A; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M; Drum M
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1228-35. PubMed ID: 18762633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
    Nusstein J; Berlin J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver JM
    Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(4):126-33. PubMed ID: 15675261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Efficacy of Lidocaine and Articaine as Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocking Agents in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hassan S; Ahmed A; Saqib W; Abulhamael AM; Habib SR; Javed MQ
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Oct; 59(10):. PubMed ID: 37893558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of Articaine Versus Lidocaine Administered as Supplementary Intraligamentary Injection after a Failed Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block: A Randomized Double-blind Study.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Miglani S; Kohli S
    J Endod; 2019 Jan; 45(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 30527595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine During Primary Maxillary Molar Extractions in Children.
    Mittal M; Sharma S; Kumar A; Chopra R; Srivastava D
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 26883609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Articaine efficacy and safety in young children below the age of four years: An equivalent parallel randomized control trial.
    Elheeny AAH
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2020 Sep; 30(5):547-555. PubMed ID: 32223002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the efficacy of a standard inferior alveolar nerve block versus articaine infiltration for invasive dental treatment in permanent mandibular molars in children: a pilot study.
    Jorgenson K; Burbridge L; Cole B
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2020 Feb; 21(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 31832992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in a Primary Intraseptal Injection: A Prospective, Randomized Double-Blind Study.
    Bonar T; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Fowler S; Beck M
    Anesth Prog; 2017; 64(4):203-211. PubMed ID: 29200372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
    Rogers BS; Botero TM; McDonald NJ; Gardner RJ; Peters MC
    J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):753-8. PubMed ID: 24862701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar: a prospective randomized, double-blind study.
    Nydegger B; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Beck M
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1912-6. PubMed ID: 25218523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.