These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37527810)

  • 1. Current perspectives on endometrial receptivity: A comprehensive overview of etiology and treatment.
    Hiraoka T; Osuga Y; Hirota Y
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Oct; 49(10):2397-2409. PubMed ID: 37527810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lipid metabolism and endometrial receptivity.
    Yang T; Zhao J; Liu F; Li Y
    Hum Reprod Update; 2022 Nov; 28(6):858-889. PubMed ID: 35639910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uterine polyps, adenomyosis, leiomyomas, and endometrial receptivity.
    Munro MG
    Fertil Steril; 2019 Apr; 111(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 30929720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implantation failure of endometrial origin: what is new?
    Bellver J; Simón C
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 30(4):229-236. PubMed ID: 29889670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recurrent Implantation Failure-update overview on etiology, diagnosis, treatment and future directions.
    Bashiri A; Halper KI; Orvieto R
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2018 Dec; 16(1):121. PubMed ID: 30518389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Personalized embryo transfer (pET) guided by endometrial receptivity (ER) assessment - a possibility to increase effectiveness of IVF procedures. Review of available methods.
    Urban A; Warzecha D; Laudanski P; Pietrzak B; Wielgos M
    Ginekol Pol; 2023; 94(12):1004-1010. PubMed ID: 37162136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Varied cellular abnormalities in thin vs. normal endometrium in recurrent implantation failure by single-cell transcriptomics.
    Fu X; Guo X; Xu H; Li Y; Jin B; Zhang X; Shu C; Fan Y; Yu Y; Tian Y; Tian J; Shu J
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2024 Jul; 22(1):90. PubMed ID: 39085925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uterine Fluid Proteins for Minimally Invasive Assessment of Endometrial Receptivity.
    Kasvandik S; Saarma M; Kaart T; Rooda I; Velthut-Meikas A; Ehrenberg A; Gemzell K; Lalitkumar PG; Salumets A; Peters M
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2020 Jan; 105(1):. PubMed ID: 31512719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying biomarkers for predicting successful embryo implantation: applying single to multi-OMICs to improve reproductive outcomes.
    Hernández-Vargas P; Muñoz M; Domínguez F
    Hum Reprod Update; 2020 Feb; 26(2):264-301. PubMed ID: 32096829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ion channels in the endometrium: regulation of endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation.
    Ruan YC; Chen H; Chan HC
    Hum Reprod Update; 2014; 20(4):517-29. PubMed ID: 24591147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of Intra-uterine Injection of Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) for Endometrial Receptivity and Thickness: a Literature Review of the Mechanisms of Action.
    Mouanness M; Ali-Bynom S; Jackman J; Seckin S; Merhi Z
    Reprod Sci; 2021 Jun; 28(6):1659-1670. PubMed ID: 33886116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Administration of calcitonin promotes blastocyst implantation in mice by up-regulating integrin β3 expression in endometrial epithelial cells.
    Xiong T; Zhao Y; Hu D; Meng J; Wang R; Yang X; Ai J; Qian K; Zhang H
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3540-51. PubMed ID: 23001774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a new comprehensive and reliable endometrial receptivity map (ER Map/ER Grade) based on RT-qPCR gene expression analysis.
    Enciso M; Carrascosa JP; Sarasa J; Martínez-Ortiz PA; Munné S; Horcajadas JA; Aizpurua J
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):220-228. PubMed ID: 29315421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Zooming in on the endometrial factor of recurrent implantation failure.
    Ifenatuoha C; Okewale B
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2022 Dec; 25(5):848-859. PubMed ID: 34002655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continuous endometrial volumetric analysis for endometrial receptivity assessment on assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Martins RS; Oliani AH; Oliani DV; de Oliveira JM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Nov; 20(1):663. PubMed ID: 33143675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing endometrial receptivity after recurrent implantation failure: a prospective controlled cohort study.
    Saxtorph MH; Hallager T; Persson G; Petersen KB; Eriksen JO; Larsen LG; Hviid TV; Macklon N
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Dec; 41(6):998-1006. PubMed ID: 32978074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assisted reproductive technologies and uterine factors influencing their success.
    Savasi V; Leone FP; Fusè F; Parisi F; Cetin I
    Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Oct; 65(5):505-24. PubMed ID: 24096288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endometrial HLA-F expression is influenced by genotypes and correlates differently with immune cell infiltration in IVF and recurrent implantation failure patients.
    Papúchová H; Saxtorph MH; Hallager T; Jepsen IE; Eriksen JO; Persson G; Funck T; Weisdorf I; Macklon NS; Larsen LG; Hviid TVF
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Jul; 37(8):1816-1834. PubMed ID: 35689445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. iTRAQ comparison of proteomic profiles of endometrial receptivity.
    Pérez-Debén S; Bellver J; Alamá P; Salsano S; Quiñonero A; Sebastian-Leon P; Díaz-Gimeno P; Domínguez F
    J Proteomics; 2019 Jul; 203():103381. PubMed ID: 31102758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expression and significance of miR-30d-5p and SOCS1 in patients with recurrent implantation failure during implantation window.
    Zhao Y; He D; Zeng H; Luo J; Yang S; Chen J; Abdullah RK; Liu N
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2021 Sep; 19(1):138. PubMed ID: 34496883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.