741 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37529688)
1. Evaluating large language models on a highly-specialized topic, radiation oncology physics.
Holmes J; Liu Z; Zhang L; Ding Y; Sio TT; McGee LA; Ashman JB; Li X; Liu T; Shen J; Liu W
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1219326. PubMed ID: 37529688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating Large Language Models for the National Premedical Exam in India: Comparative Analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Bard.
Farhat F; Chaudhry BM; Nadeem M; Sohail SS; Madsen DØ
JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 10():e51523. PubMed ID: 38381486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Learning to Make Rare and Complex Diagnoses With Generative AI Assistance: Qualitative Study of Popular Large Language Models.
Abdullahi T; Singh R; Eickhoff C
JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 10():e51391. PubMed ID: 38349725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance evaluation of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Bard on the official board examination of the Japan Radiology Society.
Toyama Y; Harigai A; Abe M; Nagano M; Kawabata M; Seki Y; Takase K
Jpn J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 42(2):201-207. PubMed ID: 37792149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial Intelligence for Anesthesiology Board-Style Examination Questions: Role of Large Language Models.
Khan AA; Yunus R; Sohail M; Rehman TA; Saeed S; Bu Y; Jackson CD; Sharkey A; Mahmood F; Matyal R
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2024 May; 38(5):1251-1259. PubMed ID: 38423884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of ChatGPT and Bard in self-assessment questions for nephrology board renewal.
Noda R; Izaki Y; Kitano F; Komatsu J; Ichikawa D; Shibagaki Y
Clin Exp Nephrol; 2024 May; 28(5):465-469. PubMed ID: 38353783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence-based potential of generative artificial intelligence large language models in orthodontics: a comparative study of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing.
Makrygiannakis MA; Giannakopoulos K; Kaklamanos EG
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38613510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the Performance of Popular Large Language Models on the National Board of Medical Examiners Sample Questions.
Abbas A; Rehman MS; Rehman SS
Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e55991. PubMed ID: 38606229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the accuracy and completeness of artificial intelligence language models in providing information on methotrexate use.
Coskun BN; Yagiz B; Ocakoglu G; Dalkilic E; Pehlivan Y
Rheumatol Int; 2024 Mar; 44(3):509-515. PubMed ID: 37747564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the Application of Large Language Models in Generating Dermatologic Patient Education Materials According to Reading Level: Qualitative Study.
Lambert R; Choo ZY; Gradwohl K; Schroedl L; Ruiz De Luzuriaga A
JMIR Dermatol; 2024 May; 7():e55898. PubMed ID: 38754096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Performance of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Bard on the Japanese National Dentist Examination: A Comparison Study.
Ohta K; Ohta S
Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50369. PubMed ID: 38213361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT, Bing, and Medical Students in Germany.
Roos J; Kasapovic A; Jansen T; Kaczmarczyk R
JMIR Med Educ; 2023 Sep; 9():e46482. PubMed ID: 37665620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Large Language Models in Answering Immuno-Oncology Questions: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Iannantuono GM; Bracken-Clarke D; Karzai F; Choo-Wosoba H; Gulley JL; Floudas CS
medRxiv; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 38076813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Large Language Models in Answering Immuno-Oncology Questions: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Iannantuono GM; Bracken-Clarke D; Karzai F; Choo-Wosoba H; Gulley JL; Floudas CS
Oncologist; 2024 May; 29(5):407-414. PubMed ID: 38309720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Google Bard on a Neurosurgery Oral Boards Preparation Question Bank.
Ali R; Tang OY; Connolly ID; Fridley JS; Shin JH; Zadnik Sullivan PL; Cielo D; Oyelese AA; Doberstein CE; Telfeian AE; Gokaslan ZL; Asaad WF
Neurosurgery; 2023 Nov; 93(5):1090-1098. PubMed ID: 37306460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models Versus Peer Users for Interpreting Laboratory Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study.
He Z; Bhasuran B; Jin Q; Tian S; Hanna K; Shavor C; Arguello LG; Murray P; Lu Z
J Med Internet Res; 2024 Apr; 26():e56655. PubMed ID: 38630520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of Large Language Models for Health Care Professionals and Patients in Navigating Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Comparison of the Performance of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Bard.
Xue E; Bracken-Clarke D; Iannantuono GM; Choo-Wosoba H; Gulley JL; Floudas CS
J Med Internet Res; 2024 May; 26():e54758. PubMed ID: 38758582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hallucination Rates and Reference Accuracy of ChatGPT and Bard for Systematic Reviews: Comparative Analysis.
Chelli M; Descamps J; Lavoué V; Trojani C; Azar M; Deckert M; Raynier JL; Clowez G; Boileau P; Ruetsch-Chelli C
J Med Internet Res; 2024 May; 26():e53164. PubMed ID: 38776130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Large language model performance on the Multi-Specialty Recruitment Assessment (MSRA) exam.
Tsoutsanis P; Tsoutsanis A
Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jan; 168():107794. PubMed ID: 38043471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Large language models and bariatric surgery patient education: a comparative readability analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Bard, and online institutional resources.
Srinivasan N; Samaan JS; Rajeev ND; Kanu MU; Yeo YH; Samakar K
Surg Endosc; 2024 May; 38(5):2522-2532. PubMed ID: 38472531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
