These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37531388)

  • 1. Scientists' deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation.
    Choi S; Anderson AA; Cagle S; Long M; Kelp N
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0287870. PubMed ID: 37531388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.
    Dudo A; Besley JC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148867. PubMed ID: 26913869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.
    Llorente C; Revuelta G; Carrió M; Porta M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224262. PubMed ID: 31721768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceived behavioral control as a moderator: Scientists' attitude, norms, and willingness to engage the public.
    Ho SS; Goh TJ; Chuah ASF
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275643. PubMed ID: 36197896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?
    Simis MJ; Madden H; Cacciatore MA; Yeo SK
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):400-14. PubMed ID: 27117768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trust in science and belief in misinformation mediate the effects of political orientation on vaccine hesitancy and intention to be vaccinated.
    Santirocchi A; Spataro P; Alessi F; Rossi-Arnaud C; Cestari V
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Jul; 237():103945. PubMed ID: 37210865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intervening on Trust in Science to Reduce Belief in COVID-19 Misinformation and Increase COVID-19 Preventive Behavioral Intentions: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Agley J; Xiao Y; Thompson EE; Chen X; Golzarri-Arroyo L
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Oct; 23(10):e32425. PubMed ID: 34581678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics.
    Fiske ST; Dupree C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13593-7. PubMed ID: 25225372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Challenge of Debunking Health Misinformation in Dynamic Social Media Conversations: Online Randomized Study of Public Masking During COVID-19.
    Mourali M; Drake C
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Mar; 24(3):e34831. PubMed ID: 35156933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why the views of Latin American Scientists on Citizen Science as a Tool for Pollinator Monitoring and Conservation Matter?
    Viana BF; Souza CQ; Moreira EF
    Neotrop Entomol; 2020 Aug; 49(4):604-613. PubMed ID: 32761554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How institutional factors at US land-grant universities impact scientists' public scholarship.
    Bao L; Calice MN; Brossard D; Beets B; Scheufele DA; Rose KM
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Feb; 32(2):124-142. PubMed ID: 35652301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison between scientists' and communication scholars' views about scientists' public engagement activities.
    Yuan S; Besley JC; Dudo A
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Jan; 28(1):101-118. PubMed ID: 30175667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientists' incentives and attitudes toward public communication.
    Rose KM; Markowitz EM; Brossard D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jan; 117(3):1274-1276. PubMed ID: 31911470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New trends in science communication fostering evidence-informed policymaking.
    Szüdi G; Bartar P; Weiss G; Pellegrini G; Tulin M; Oomen T
    Open Res Eur; 2022; 2():78. PubMed ID: 37920848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.
    Giotakos O
    Psychiatriki; 2022 Sep; 33(3):183-186. PubMed ID: 35947862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation.
    Chan MS; Jones CR; Hall Jamieson K; Albarracín D
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1531-1546. PubMed ID: 28895452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Behavioral Inhibition System and Engagement With, and Influence By, COVID-19 and Election-Based Misinformation.
    McGarry P; Shortland N; Anastasio N; Palmieri M
    J Interpers Violence; 2024 Jan; 39(1-2):133-156. PubMed ID: 37650441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comprehensive examination of association between belief in vaccine misinformation and vaccination intention in the COVID-19 context.
    Kim K; Lee CJ; Ihm J; Kim Y
    J Health Commun; 2022 Jul; 27(7):495-509. PubMed ID: 36205037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychological Inoculation for Credibility Assessment, Sharing Intention, and Discernment of Misinformation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lu C; Hu B; Li Q; Bi C; Ju XD
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Aug; 25():e49255. PubMed ID: 37560816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting scientists' participation in public life.
    Besley JC; Oh SH; Nisbet M
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Nov; 22(8):971-87. PubMed ID: 23825262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.