BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37531618)

  • 1. Correction to: A transformation perspective on marginal and conditional models.
    Biostatistics; 2024 Apr; 25(2):597. PubMed ID: 37531618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Note on Conditional AIC for Linear Mixed-Effects Models.
    Liang H; Wu H; Zou G
    Biometrika; 2008; 95(3):773-778. PubMed ID: 19122890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bridged parametric survival models: General paradigm and speed improvements.
    Swihart BJ; Bandyopadhyay D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Jul; 206():106115. PubMed ID: 33992900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian Comparison of Latent Variable Models: Conditional Versus Marginal Likelihoods.
    Merkle EC; Furr D; Rabe-Hesketh S
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):802-829. PubMed ID: 31297664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal and Conditional Confounding Using Logits.
    Karlson KB; Popham F; Holm A
    Sociol Methods Res; 2023 Nov; 52(4):1765-1784. PubMed ID: 37873547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of familial aggregation in total, against-the-rule, with-the-rule, and oblique astigmatism by conditional and marginal models in the Tehran eye study.
    Rakhshani MH; Mohammad K; Zeraati H; Nourijelyani K; Hashemi H; Fotouhi A
    Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2012 Oct; 19(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 23248542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decreased Susceptibility of Marginal Odds Ratios to Finite-sample Bias.
    Ross RK; Cole SR; Richardson DB
    Epidemiology; 2021 Sep; 32(5):648-652. PubMed ID: 34001751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A profile conditional likelihood approach for the semiparametric transformation regression model with missing covariates.
    Chen HY; Little RJ
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2001 Sep; 7(3):207-24. PubMed ID: 11677827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of marginal and conditional models for capture-recapture data with application to human rights violations data.
    Mitchell S; Ozonoff A; Zaslavsky AM; Hedt-Gauthier B; Lum K; Coull BA
    Biometrics; 2013 Dec; 69(4):1022-32. PubMed ID: 24164278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A graphical perspective of marginal structural models: An application for the estimation of the effect of physical activity on blood pressure.
    Talbot D; Rossi AM; Bacon SL; Atherton J; Lefebvre G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2428-2436. PubMed ID: 27920366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal Versus Conditional Odds Ratios When Updating Risk Prediction Models.
    Sadatsafavi M; Tavakoli H; Safari A
    Epidemiology; 2022 Jul; 33(4):555-558. PubMed ID: 35394467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical characterization of QT prolongation.
    Schall R; Ring A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):543-62. PubMed ID: 20358435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginalized binary mixed-effects models with covariate-dependent random effects and likelihood inference.
    Wang Z; Louis TA
    Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):884-91. PubMed ID: 15606408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of omitted covariates in marginal and partially conditional recurrent event analyses.
    Zhong Y; Cook RJ
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2019 Apr; 25(2):280-300. PubMed ID: 29767377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Point estimation following a two-stage group sequential trial.
    Grayling MJ; Wason JM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Feb; 32(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 36384365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulating longitudinal data from marginal structural models using the additive hazard model.
    Keogh RH; Seaman SR; Gran JM; Vansteelandt S
    Biom J; 2021 Oct; 63(7):1526-1541. PubMed ID: 33983641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On hazard ratio estimators by proportional hazards models in matched-pair cohort studies.
    Shinozaki T; Mansournia MA; Matsuyama Y
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2017; 14():6. PubMed ID: 28592984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative Bias Analysis for a Misclassified Confounder: A Comparison Between Marginal Structural Models and Conditional Models for Point Treatments.
    Nab L; Groenwold RHH; van Smeden M; Keogh RH
    Epidemiology; 2020 Nov; 31(6):796-805. PubMed ID: 32826524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal versus conditional versus 'structural source' models: a rationale for an alternative to log-linear methods for capture-recapture estimates.
    Regal RR; Hook EB
    Stat Med; 1998 Jan; 17(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 9463850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal structural models for the estimation of direct and indirect effects.
    VanderWeele TJ
    Epidemiology; 2009 Jan; 20(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19234398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.