These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3753301)

  • 1. On prediction of hearing disability.
    Parving A; Ostri B; Katholm M; Parbo J
    Audiology; 1986; 25(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 3753301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech in noise: a practical test procedure.
    Jayaram M; Baguley DM; Moffat DA
    J Laryngol Otol; 1992 Feb; 106(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 1556480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].
    Thümmler R; Liebscher T; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 27126291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlations between self-assessed hearing handicap and standard audiometric tests in elderly persons.
    Pedersen K; Rosenhall U
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 1842275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Background noise in rooms used for pure-tone audiometry in disability assessment.
    Robinson DW
    Br J Audiol; 1992 Feb; 26(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 1586848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The intelligibility of sentences in quiet and in noise in aged listeners.
    Duquesnoy AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1136-44. PubMed ID: 6643835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audiometric and subjective assessment of hearing handicap.
    Matthews LJ; Lee FS; Mills JH; Schum DJ
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1990 Nov; 116(11):1325-30. PubMed ID: 2242265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Difficulties with speech intelligibility in noise in spite of a normal pure-tone audiogram.
    Middelweerd MJ; Festen JM; Plomp R
    Audiology; 1990; 29(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 2310349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.
    Smoorenburg GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):421-37. PubMed ID: 1737889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The AMA method of estimation of hearing disability: a validation study.
    Dobie RA
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):732-40. PubMed ID: 21694598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech-in-Noise Test results of compensation claimants for noise induced hearing loss in Korean male workers: Words-in-Noise Test (WIN) and quick-Hearing-in-Noise Test (HINT).
    Kim JS; Kwon JK; Kim NJ; Lee JH
    Ann Occup Environ Med; 2021; 33():e11. PubMed ID: 34754472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Intelligibility of monosyllables in relation to tone hearing in noise-induced hearing loss].
    Tymnik G; Stange E; Lessing G; Zobelt U
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1987 Jun; 66(6):335-7. PubMed ID: 3626717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Relations between pure-tone threshold and discrimination of monosyllables in inner ear high-frequency hearing disorders].
    Battmer RD; Lehnhardt E
    HNO; 1984 Feb; 32(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 6706703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Hearing Loss and Speech Recognition in the Elderly].
    von Gablenz P; Holube I
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2017 Nov; 96(11):759-764. PubMed ID: 29132188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Study the impacts of diagnosis on occupational noise-induced deafness after bring into the different high frequency hearing threshold weighted value].
    Xue LJ; Yang AC; Chen H; Huang WX; Guo JJ; Liang XY; Chen ZQ; Zheng QL
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 35(11):812-817. PubMed ID: 29316750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Otoacoustic emissions, pure-tone audiometry, and self-reported hearing.
    Engdahl B; Tambs K; Hoffman HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 23216196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the hearing threshold measured by manual pure-tone and by self-recording (Békésy) audiometry.
    Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
    Audiology; 1979; 18(5):414-29. PubMed ID: 496724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.