149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37533048)
21. Posterior resin composite restorations: a new technique.
Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; Correa M; Ritter AV
Quintessence Int; 1996 Nov; 27(11):733-8. PubMed ID: 9161264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of Adjacent Tooth Type and Occlusal Fatigue on Proximal Contact Force of Posterior Bulk Fill and Incremental Resin Composite Restoration.
Oliveira L; Melo C; Cavalcanti K; Soares P; Cardenas A; Soares CJ
Oper Dent; 2022 Jan; 47(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 35090036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Proximal contact tightness of direct Class II composite resin restorations with various matrix systems: A systematic review.
Anantula K; Vankayala B; Yadav SS
J Conserv Dent Endod; 2024 Jan; 27(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 38389748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Proximal contact tightness between direct-composite additions in the posterior dentition: an in vitro investigation.
Wolff D; Hahn P; Ding P; Maier-Kraus T; Frese C; Doerfer C; Staehle HJ
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 22313273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Proximal marginal overhang of composite restorations in relation to placement technique of separation rings.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Huysmans MC
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 21942287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A novel filling technique for packable composite resin in Class II restorations.
Francci C; Loguercio AD; Reis A; Carrilho MR
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 12132569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A clinical study on interdental separation techniques.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters FJ; Dörfer CE
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 17555170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Use of Transparent Tips for Obtaining Tight Proximal Contacts in Direct Class II Composite Resin Restorations.
Alonso V; Caserio M; Darriba IL
Oper Dent; 2019; 44(5):446-451. PubMed ID: 31084531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of Matrix Systems on the Proximal Contact of Class II Composite Restorations: A Systematic Review.
Alshardan R; Rozi A; AlSenan D; Rozi A; AlJohani B; Almusallam J; AlAteeq N
Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50835. PubMed ID: 38259361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The long-term effect of a composite resin restoration on proximal contact tightness.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Plasschaert AJ
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 16904254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A randomized clinical trial on proximal contacts of posterior composites.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Burgersdijk RC; Dörfer CE
J Dent; 2006 Apr; 34(4):292-7. PubMed ID: 16157438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrix systems.
Cenci MS; Lund RG; Pereira CL; de Carvalho RM; Demarco FF
J Adhes Dent; 2006 Apr; 8(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 16708725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations.
Prakki A; Cilli R; Saad JO; Rodrigues JR
Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):785-9. PubMed ID: 15553286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques.
El-Badrawy WA; Leung BW; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH; Rubo MH
J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 12622881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Proximal contact tightness of class Ⅱ bulk-fill composite resin restorations: An in vitro study.
El-Shamy H; Sonbul H; Alturkestani N; Tashkandi A; Loomans BA; Dörfer C; El-Badrawy W
Dent Mater J; 2019 Feb; 38(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 30381630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In vivo Evaluation of Proximal Resin Composite Restorations performed using Three Different Matrix Systems.
Gomes IA; Filho EM; Mariz DC; Borges AH; Tonetto MR; Firoozmand LM; Kuga CM; De Jesus RR; Bandéca MC
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Aug; 16(8):643-7. PubMed ID: 26423500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resin-based composite restorations in vitro.
Hofmann N; Hunecke A
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16536200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Class II direct composite resin restorations using the prepolymerized ball technique.
Feinman RA
Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1993 Apr; 5(3 Suppl 1):5-11. PubMed ID: 8219156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts.
Rada RE
Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):793-8. PubMed ID: 20830892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
