These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3753315)

  • 1. Quality assurance in The Netherlands: Part 2. An evaluation of the CBO peer review experience in hospital care.
    Williamson JW; Greenfield S; van Andel H; Torr S
    Aust Clin Rev; 1986 Mar; 6(20):4-8. PubMed ID: 3753315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality assurance in The Netherlands: Part 1. An evaluation of the CBO peer review experience in hospital care.
    Williamson JW; Greenfield S; van Andel H; Torr S
    Aust Clin Rev; 1985 Dec; 5(19):160-7. PubMed ID: 3833164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the quality of hospital services in The Netherlands. The role of CBO--The National Organization for Quality Assurance in The Netherlands.
    Reerink E
    Qual Assur Health Care; 1990; 2(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 2103868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploding 12 myths about quality assurance and peer review.
    Thompson RE
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):39-49. PubMed ID: 10290183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality management in medical specialties: the use of channels and dikes in improving health care in The Netherlands.
    Klazinga N; Lombarts K; van Everdingen J
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1998 May; 24(5):240-50. PubMed ID: 9626617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The CBO (Central Guidance Organization for Peer Review), or: guidance of 25,000 nurses. 'The CBO assists people in safeguarding their own quality'].
    de Graaf T
    TVZ; 1992 Jan; (2):45-7. PubMed ID: 1540319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Consensus about consensus. A critical consideration of the procedure of the CBO-consensus development (Central Support Organ for Peer Review)].
    Grol RP; van Everdingen JJ; Kuipers F; Casparie AF
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Jun; 134(24):1186-9. PubMed ID: 2195362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Peer review and quality management: are they compatible?".
    Zusman J
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1990 Dec; 16(12):418-20. PubMed ID: 2101443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From quality assurance to continuous quality improvement.
    Thompson RE
    Physician Exec; 1991; 17(5):3-8. PubMed ID: 10160793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Arcadia revisited: quality assurance in hospitals in The Netherlands.
    Reerink E
    BMJ; 1991 Jun; 302(6790):1443-5. PubMed ID: 2070113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hospital audit should be tailor-made. Some experiences with hospital-wide quality assurance in three hospitals in The Netherlands.
    Klazinga NS
    Aust Clin Rev; 1987 Mar; 7(24):40-2. PubMed ID: 3566648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A values-based response.
    Warden G
    Hosp Health Netw; 2006 Jul; 80(7):134. PubMed ID: 16915974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surveying customer needs, not satisfaction, is crucial to CQI.
    Koska MT
    Hospitals; 1992 Nov; 66(21):50, 52, 54. PubMed ID: 1427717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating quality assurance.
    McCarthy SM
    Hosp Trustee; 1991; 15(3):18-21. PubMed ID: 10110856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Four countries studied on quality.
    Dunbar C
    Comput Healthc; 1992 Sep; 13(9):65-6. PubMed ID: 10122920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. French state of the art with regard to total quality management: a focus on hospital care--accreditation, evaluation and quality assurance.
    Durand-Zaleski I
    World Hosp Health Serv; 1998; 34(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 10179642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Set priorities when planning QI projects.
    Spath P
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1995 Feb; 20(2):34-6. PubMed ID: 10153183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Making sense of the chaos. The specific aim is to get concrete agreement on the priority areas for quality improvement.
    Umbdenstock R
    Hosp Health Netw; 2008 Dec; 82(12):58. PubMed ID: 19209505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes, benchmarking and TQM.
    Grayson CJ
    Health Syst Rev; 1993; 26(6):14-7. PubMed ID: 10130170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experiences with self-assessment and peer review among general practitioners in The Netherlands.
    Crebolder HF
    Aust Clin Rev; 1987 Mar; 7(24):32-5. PubMed ID: 3566645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.