134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37533321)
1. Clinical outcomes following different stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Bujak K; Verardi FM; Arevalos V; Gabani R; Spione F; Rajwa P; Milasinovic D; Stankovic G; Gasior M; Sabaté M; Brugaletta S
EuroIntervention; 2023 Oct; 19(8):664-675. PubMed ID: 37533321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Outcomes Following Coronary Bifurcation PCI Techniques: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comprising 5,711 Patients.
Di Gioia G; Sonck J; Ferenc M; Chen SL; Colaiori I; Gallinoro E; Mizukami T; Kodeboina M; Nagumo S; Franco D; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Wyffels E; De Bruyne B; Lassen JF; Bennett J; Vassilev D; Serruys PW; Stankovic G; Louvard Y; Barbato E; Collet C
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 13(12):1432-1444. PubMed ID: 32553331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis demonstrates superiority of double-kissing crush in complex lesions.
Wang R; Ding Y; Yang J; Wang K; Gao W; Fang Z; Zhou Y; Ge H
Clin Res Cardiol; 2022 Jul; 111(7):761-775. PubMed ID: 34862569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions: Evidence from a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Chiabrando JG; Lombardi M; Vescovo GM; Wohlford GF; Koenig RA; Abbate A; Guzmán LA; Berrocal DH; Biondi-Zoccai G
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Feb; 97(3):E306-E318. PubMed ID: 32662603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized clinical study comparing double kissing crush with provisional stenting for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the DKCRUSH-II (Double Kissing Crush versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions) trial.
Chen SL; Santoso T; Zhang JJ; Ye F; Xu YW; Fu Q; Kan J; Paiboon C; Zhou Y; Ding SQ; Kwan TW
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Feb; 57(8):914-20. PubMed ID: 21329837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial.
Chen SL; Zhang JJ; Han Y; Kan J; Chen L; Qiu C; Jiang T; Tao L; Zeng H; Li L; Xia Y; Gao C; Santoso T; Paiboon C; Wang Y; Kwan TW; Ye F; Tian N; Liu Z; Lin S; Lu C; Wen S; Hong L; Zhang Q; Sheiban I; Xu Y; Wang L; Rab TS; Li Z; Cheng G; Cui L; Leon MB; Stone GW
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 70(21):2605-2617. PubMed ID: 29096915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Outcome After DK Crush Versus Culotte Stenting of Distal Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: The 3-Year Follow-Up Results of the DKCRUSH-III Study.
Chen SL; Xu B; Han YL; Sheiban I; Zhang JJ; Ye F; Kwan TW; Paiboon C; Zhou YJ; Lv SZ; Dangas GD; Xu YW; Wen SY; Hong L; Zhang RY; Wang HC; Jiang TM; Wang Y; Sansoto T; Chen F; Yuan ZY; Li WM; Leon MB
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 8(10):1335-1342. PubMed ID: 26315736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of double kissing crush versus Culotte stenting for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions: results from a multicenter, randomized, prospective DKCRUSH-III study.
Chen SL; Xu B; Han YL; Sheiban I; Zhang JJ; Ye F; Kwan TW; Paiboon C; Zhou YJ; Lv SZ; Dangas GD; Xu YW; Wen SY; Hong L; Zhang RY; Wang HC; Jiang TM; Wang Y; Chen F; Yuan ZY; Li WM; Leon MB
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 61(14):1482-8. PubMed ID: 23490040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Bifurcation Techniques for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Park DY; An S; Jolly N; Attanasio S; Yadav N; Rao S; Vij A
J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 Jun; 11(12):e025394. PubMed ID: 35723005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Five-year clinical follow-up of unprotected left main bifurcation lesion stenting: one-stent versus two-stent techniques versus double-kissing crush technique.
Chen SL; Zhang Y; Xu B; Ye F; Zhang J; Tian N; Liu Z; Qian X; Ding S; Li F; Zhang A; Liu Y; Lin S
EuroIntervention; 2012 Nov; 8(7):803-14. PubMed ID: 23171801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3-Year Outcomes of the DKCRUSH-V Trial Comparing DK Crush With Provisional Stenting for Left Main Bifurcation Lesions.
Chen X; Li X; Zhang JJ; Han Y; Kan J; Chen L; Qiu C; Santoso T; Paiboon C; Kwan TW; Sheiban I; Leon MB; Stone GW; Chen SL;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(19):1927-1937. PubMed ID: 31521645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Bayesian meta-analysis of double kissing (DK) crush or provisional stenting for coronary artery bifurcation lesions.
Kumar A; Shariff M; Singal A; Bhat V; Stulak J; Reed G; Kalra A
Indian Heart J; 2024; 76(2):113-117. PubMed ID: 38537883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Crush versus Culotte stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials with long-term follow-up.
Chen E; Cai W; Chen LL
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Apr; 98(14):e14865. PubMed ID: 30946314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bifurcation stenting in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an analysis from dkcrush II randomized study.
Kwan TW; Gujja K; Liou MC; Huang Y; Wong S; Coppola J; Chen SL
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E133-7. PubMed ID: 23529835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DK mini-culotte stenting in the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions: a propensity score matching comparison with T-provisional stenting.
Fan L; Chen L; Luo Y; Zhang L; Zhong W; Lin C; Chen Z; Peng Y; Zhen X; Dong X
Heart Vessels; 2016 Mar; 31(3):308-21. PubMed ID: 25515667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Techniques for Bifurcation Disease: Network Meta-analysis Reveals Superiority of Double-Kissing Crush.
Crimi G; Mandurino-Mirizzi A; Gritti V; Scotti V; Strozzi C; de Silvestri A; Montalto C; di Giacomo C; d'Ascenzo F; Repetto A; Ferlini M; Marinoni B; Ferrario M; de Servi S; Visconti LO; Klersy C
Can J Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 36(6):906-914. PubMed ID: 31924454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term outcomes of provisional stenting compared with a two-stent strategy for bifurcation lesions: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Nairooz R; Saad M; Elgendy IY; Mahmoud AN; Habash F; Sardar P; Anderson D; Shavelle DM; Abbott JD
Heart; 2017 Sep; 103(18):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 28314731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical outcome after crush versus culotte stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic Stent Technique Study 36-month follow-up results.
Kervinen K; Niemelä M; Romppanen H; Erglis A; Kumsars I; Maeng M; Holm NR; Lassen JF; Gunnes P; Stavnes S; Jensen JS; Galløe A; Narbute I; Sondore D; Christiansen EH; Ravkilde J; Steigen TK; Mannsverk J; Thayssen P; Hansen KN; Helqvist S; Vikman S; Wiseth R; Aarøe J; Jokelainen J; Thuesen L;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1160-5. PubMed ID: 24262616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiovascular outcomes associated with crush versus provisional stenting techniques for bifurcation lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Huang F; Luo ZC
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2019 Apr; 19(1):93. PubMed ID: 31014237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcomes With Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Techniques.
Elbadawi A; Shnoda M; Dang A; Gad M; Abdelazeem M; Saad M; Salama A; Sharma A; Gilani S; Latib A; Rab T; Elgendy IY; Abbott JD
Am J Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 165():37-45. PubMed ID: 34937656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
