156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37534347)
1. Comparison of the Efficacy of Amniotic Membrane Versus Buccal Fat Pad in Treatment of Oral Submucous Fibrosis.
Sharma S; Mehra H; Gupta H; Agarwal R; Gangwar A; Kumar A
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2023 Sep; 22(3):525-532. PubMed ID: 37534347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is buccal fat pad a better option than nasolabial flap for reconstruction of intraoral defects after surgical release of fibrous bands in patients with oral submucous fibrosis? A pilot study: a protocol for the management of oral submucous fibrosis.
Rai A; Datarkar A; Rai M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e111-6. PubMed ID: 24103462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Evaluation of Buccal Fat Pad and Nasolabial Flap for Oral Submucous Fibrosis Intraoral Defects.
Anehosur V; Singh PK; Dikhit PS; Vadera H
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr; 2021 Sep; 14(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 34471475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparative Evaluation between the Use of Buccal Pad of Fat and Bovine Collagen Membrane in the Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis.
Kothari S; Mittal S; Shaik I; Gufran K; Daharwal R; Kolli H
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S190-S193. PubMed ID: 34447073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two wound-covering materials in the surgical treatment of oral submucous fibrosis: a clinical comparison.
Pradhan H; Gupta H; Sinha V; Gupta S; Shashikanth M
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2012; 2(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 25756025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis using buccal fat pad: a retrospective study of 30 cases.
Thukral H; Roy Chowdhury SK; Nagori SA
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 22(4):403-408. PubMed ID: 30238329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of buccal fat pad in the surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis: a prospective study.
Lambade P; Dawane P; Thorat A
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 20(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 26768398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Collagen Membrane Over Buccal Fat Pad Versus Buccal Fat Pad in Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Comparative Prospective Study.
Singh G; Mishra M; Gaur A; Srivastava A; Shukla B; Das G
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2018 Dec; 17(4):482-487. PubMed ID: 30344390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Evaluation of Reconstructive Methods in Oral Submucous Fibrosis.
Sikkerimath BC; Dandagi S; Anshu A; Jose A
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2021 Dec; 20(4):597-606. PubMed ID: 34776692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Extended Nasolabial Flap Versus Buccal Fat Pad Graft in the Surgical Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Prospective Pilot Study.
Patil SB; Durairaj D; Suresh Kumar G; Karthikeyan D; Pradeep D
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2017 Sep; 16(3):312-321. PubMed ID: 28717289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparative Clinical Evaluation of the Buccal Fat Pad and Extended Nasolabial Flap in the Reconstruction of the Surgical Defect in Oral Submucous Fibrosis Patients.
Agrawal D; Pathak R; Newaskar V; Idrees F; Waskle R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 76(3):676.e1-676.e5. PubMed ID: 29223311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is the Optimal Reconstructive Option for Oral Submucous Fibrosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Buccal Pad of Fat Versus Conventional Nasolabial and Extended Nasolabial Flap Versus Platysma Myocutaneous Flap.
Tiwari P; Bera RN; Chauhan N
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2020 Dec; 19(4):490-497. PubMed ID: 33071494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Evaluation of Nasolabial Flap, Buccal Fat Pad and Platysma Myocutaneous Flap for Reconstruction of Oral Sub Mucous Fibrosis Defects.
Singh AK; Bera RN; Neville JF; Tripathi R; Sharma NK; Kumar JA; Hirani MS; Chauhan N
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Dec; 75(4):2945-2951. PubMed ID: 37974718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Versatility of Buccal Pad Fat and Temporoparietal Fascia Flap in Surgical Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis.
Mukherjee S; Dandagi S
Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2019; 9(2):444-450. PubMed ID: 31909033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of versatility and effectiveness of pedicled buccal fat pad used in the reconstruction of intra oral defects.
Prashanth R; Nandini GD; Balakrishna R
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2013 Jun; 12(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 24431833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coronoidectomy, masticatory myotomy and buccal fat pad graft in management of advanced oral submucous fibrosis.
Kothari MC; Hallur N; Sikkerimath B; Gudi S; Kothari CR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 41(11):1416-21. PubMed ID: 22551649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Retrospective Study Comparing the Surgical Results of Platysma Myocutaneous Flap, Buccal Pad of Fat, and Nasolabial Flap for Reconstruction After Fibrotomy in Cases of Oral Submucous Fibrosis.
Tulsidas Singh W; Bhola N; Singh DN; Agarwal A; Aparna Devi P; Aheibam KK
Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e60297. PubMed ID: 38872644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of buccal pad of fat with and without bovine collagen membrane in the management of oral submucous fibrosis: A prospective clinical study.
Pandey A; Sharma NK; Dhiman NK; Jaiswara C; Tiwari P; Singh AK; Verma V; Singh S
Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2020; 11(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 33041578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of nasolabial flap and buccal fat pad flap in the surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Al-Madhoon HW; Elkhateb A; Asla MM; Jaber M
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Mar; 28(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 37219705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Functional outcome of two different grafting techniques in the surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis: a comparative evaluation.
Dasukil S; Jena AK; Boyina KK; Grover S; Arora G; Ahmed ZU
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Sep; 26(3):477-483. PubMed ID: 34661770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
