114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37534882)
1. Discriminative Factors of Malignancy of Ipsilateral Nonmass Enhancement in Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer on Initial Staging Breast MRI.
Jirarayapong J; Chikarmane SA; Portnow LH; Farah S; Gombos EC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 May; 59(5):1725-1739. PubMed ID: 37534882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revisiting Nonmass Enhancement in Breast MRI: Analysis of Outcomes and Follow-Up Using the Updated BI-RADS Atlas.
Chikarmane SA; Michaels AY; Giess CS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1178-1184. PubMed ID: 28834447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Significance of Additional Non-Mass Enhancement in Patients with Breast Cancer on Preoperative 3T Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of the Breast.
Cho YH; Cho KR; Park EK; Seo BK; Woo OH; Cho SB; Bae JW
Iran J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 13(1):e30909. PubMed ID: 27127579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation of Nonmass Enhancement Contiguous with Malignant Index Breast Cancer Masses at Preoperative Breast MRI.
Nguyen DL; Lotfalla M; Cimino-Mathews A; Habibi M; Ambinder EB
Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2024 Mar; 6(2):e230060. PubMed ID: 38305717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver variability and likelihood of malignancy for fifth edition BI-RADS MRI descriptors in non-mass breast lesions.
Lunkiewicz M; Forte S; Freiwald B; Singer G; Leo C; Kubik-Huch RA
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 31392476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clumped vs non-clumped internal enhancement patterns in linear non-mass enhancement on breast MRI.
Chen ST; Covelli J; Okamoto S; Daniel BL; DeMartini WB; Ikeda DM
Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201166. PubMed ID: 33332980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-mass enhancement breast lesions: MRI findings and associations with malignancy.
Liu G; Li Y; Chen SL; Chen Q
Ann Transl Med; 2022 Mar; 10(6):357. PubMed ID: 35433999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The MRI characteristics of non-mass enhancement lesions of the breast: associations with malignancy.
Aydin H
Br J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 92(1096):20180464. PubMed ID: 30673299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonmass Enhancement at Breast MRI in Predicting Tumor Involvement of the Nipple: A Prospective Study in a Single Institution.
Bae SJ; Cha YJ; Eun NL; Ji JH; Kim D; Lee J; Ahn SG; Son EJ; Jeong J
Radiology; 2021 Oct; 301(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 34254854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two Distinct Types of Linear Distribution in Nonmass Enhancement at Breast MR Imaging: Difference in Positive Predictive Value between Linear and Branching Patterns.
Machida Y; Tozaki M; Shimauchi A; Yoshida T
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):686-94. PubMed ID: 25875971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Associated with Positive Resection Margins in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
Kang JH; Youk JH; Kim JA; Gweon HM; Eun NL; Ko KH; Son EJ
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(5):897-904. PubMed ID: 30174479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiparametric MRI model with dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging enables breast cancer diagnosis with high accuracy.
Zhang M; Horvat JV; Bernard-Davila B; Marino MA; Leithner D; Ochoa-Albiztegui RE; Helbich TH; Morris EA; Thakur S; Pinker K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):864-874. PubMed ID: 30375702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast Nonmass Enhancement Detected with MRI: Uility and Lesion Characterization with Second-Look Ultrasonography.
Hsu HH; Chang TH; Chou YC; Peng YJ; Ko KH; Chang WC; Lin YP; Hsu GC; Yu JC
Breast J; 2015; 21(6):579-87. PubMed ID: 26390913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphology evaluation of nonmass enhancement on breast MRI: Effect of a three-step interpretation model for readers' performances and biopsy recommendations.
Shimauchi A; Ota H; Machida Y; Yoshida T; Satani N; Mori N; Takase K; Tozaki M
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Feb; 85(2):480-8. PubMed ID: 26781155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Apocrine Metaplasia Found at MR Biopsy: Is There Something to be Learned?
Gao Y; Dialani V; DeBenedectis C; Johnson N; Brachtel E; Slanetz P
Breast J; 2017 Jul; 23(4):429-435. PubMed ID: 28079289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Management of Non-Mass Enhancement at Breast Magnetic Resonance in Screening Settings Referred for Magnetic Resonance-Guided Biopsy.
de Faria Castro Fleury E; Castro C; do Amaral MSC; Roveda Junior D
Breast Cancer (Auckl); 2022; 16():11782234221095897. PubMed ID: 35602239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic value of mammography for accompanying non-mass enhancement on preoperative breast MRI.
Kim Y; Jung HK; Park AY; Ko KH; Jang H
Acta Radiol; 2022 Aug; 63(8):1032-1042. PubMed ID: 34260322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can enhancement types on preoperative MRI reflect prognostic factors and surgical outcomes in invasive breast cancer?
Koh J; Park AY; Ko KH; Jung HK
Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):7000-7008. PubMed ID: 31187220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of conventional DCE-MRI and a novel golden-angle radial multicoil compressed sensing method for the evaluation of breast lesion conspicuity.
Heacock L; Gao Y; Heller SL; Melsaether AN; Babb JS; Block TK; Otazo R; Kim SG; Moy L
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 45(6):1746-1752. PubMed ID: 27859874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of MRI-Directed Breast Ultrasound and Lesion Characteristics Affecting Visualization on Breast Ultrasound.
Xiao L; Simmons C; Khanani S
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2022; 51(5):717-721. PubMed ID: 35272882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
