These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37535505)

  • 1. Should Robot-Assisted Surgery Tolerate or Even Accommodate Less Surgical Dexterity?
    Fay K; Patel AD
    AMA J Ethics; 2023 Aug; 25(8):E609-614. PubMed ID: 37535505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery.
    Truong M; Kim JH; Scheib S; Patzkowsky K
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 28(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 27362711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Study of Ergonomics in Conventional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery.
    Pérez-Salazar MJ; Caballero D; Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jun; 24(12):. PubMed ID: 38931624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of precision and speed in laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgical task performance.
    Zihni A; Gerull WD; Cavallo JA; Ge T; Ray S; Chiu J; Brunt LM; Awad MM
    J Surg Res; 2018 Mar; 223():29-33. PubMed ID: 29433882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.
    Choussein S; Srouji SS; Farland LV; Wietsma A; Missmer SA; Hollis M; Yu RN; Pozner CN; Gargiulo AR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28734971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 30 Years of Robotic Surgery.
    Leal Ghezzi T; Campos Corleta O
    World J Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(10):2550-7. PubMed ID: 27177648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic ergonomic risk.
    Monfared S; Athanasiadis DI; Umana L; Hernandez E; Asadi H; Colgate CL; Yu D; Stefanidis D
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Nov; 36(11):8397-8402. PubMed ID: 35182219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology: A Critical Appraisal of the GECI and SIVI Consensus of European Experts.
    Esposito C; Blanc T; Lardy H; Masieri L; Fourcade L; Mendoza-Sagaon M; Nappo S; Lopez M; Pelizzo G; Steyaert H; Gamba P; Scuderi MG; Escolino M; Castagnetti M; Chiarenza F; Ghoneimi AE
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2022 Oct; 32(10):1108-1113. PubMed ID: 35796702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: cost and training.
    Amodeo A; Linares Quevedo A; Joseph JV; Belgrano E; Patel HR
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2009 Jun; 61(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 19451894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of robotic surgery on pelvic floor reconstruction.
    Giannini A; Russo E; Malacarne E; Cecchi E; Mannella P; Simoncini T
    Minerva Ginecol; 2019 Feb; 71(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 30318878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pediatric robotic surgery: An overview.
    Jacobson JC; Pandya SR
    Semin Pediatr Surg; 2023 Feb; 32(1):151255. PubMed ID: 36736161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair.
    Ross JW; Preston MR
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 19415062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of preferred surgical modality on surgeon wellness: a survey of workload, physical pain/discomfort, and neuromusculoskeletal disorders.
    Norasi H; Hallbeck MS; Elli EF; Tollefson MK; Harold KL; Pak R
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Dec; 37(12):9244-9254. PubMed ID: 37872425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery.
    Nezhat C; Saberi NS; Shahmohamady B; Nezhat F
    JSLS; 2006; 10(3):317-20. PubMed ID: 17212887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Between Senior and Junior Surgeons.
    Spampinato G; Binet A; Fourcade L; Mendoza Sagaon M; Villemagne T; Braik K; Grosos C; Lardy H; Ballouhey Q
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Apr; 31(4):478-483. PubMed ID: 33651635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robot-assisted techniques in vascular and endovascular surgery.
    Püschel A; Schafmayer C; Groß J
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Aug; 407(5):1789-1795. PubMed ID: 35226179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.
    Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic Applications for Benign Gynecologic Procedures.
    Connor A; Pasic R; Quevedo A; Chamseddine P
    Surg Technol Int; 2021 Jun; 39():232-240. PubMed ID: 34181238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.