These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37535505)
1. Should Robot-Assisted Surgery Tolerate or Even Accommodate Less Surgical Dexterity? Fay K; Patel AD AMA J Ethics; 2023 Aug; 25(8):E609-614. PubMed ID: 37535505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery. Truong M; Kim JH; Scheib S; Patzkowsky K Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 28(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 27362711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative Study of Ergonomics in Conventional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery. Pérez-Salazar MJ; Caballero D; Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jun; 24(12):. PubMed ID: 38931624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of precision and speed in laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgical task performance. Zihni A; Gerull WD; Cavallo JA; Ge T; Ray S; Chiu J; Brunt LM; Awad MM J Surg Res; 2018 Mar; 223():29-33. PubMed ID: 29433882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics. Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]