133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37535759)
1. The complex dynamics of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Turkey,
Jia Z; Jin Z; Marchandon M; Ulrich T; Gabriel AA; Fan W; Shearer P; Zou X; Rekoske J; Bulut F; Garagon A; Fialko Y
Science; 2023 Sep; 381(6661):985-990. PubMed ID: 37535759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Supershear triggering and cascading fault ruptures of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, earthquake doublet.
Ren C; Wang Z; Taymaz T; Hu N; Luo H; Zhao Z; Yue H; Song X; Shen Z; Xu H; Geng J; Zhang W; Wang T; Ge Z; Irmak TS; Erman C; Zhou Y; Li Z; Xu H; Cao B; Ding H
Science; 2024 Jan; 383(6680):305-311. PubMed ID: 38236973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complex multi-fault rupture and triggering during the 2023 earthquake doublet in southeastern Türkiye.
Liu C; Lay T; Wang R; Taymaz T; Xie Z; Xiong X; Irmak TS; Kahraman M; Erman C
Nat Commun; 2023 Sep; 14(1):5564. PubMed ID: 37689816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamics, interactions and delays of the 2019 Ridgecrest rupture sequence.
Taufiqurrahman T; Gabriel AA; Li D; Ulrich T; Li B; Carena S; Verdecchia A; Gallovič F
Nature; 2023 Jun; 618(7964):308-315. PubMed ID: 37225989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immature characteristics of the East Anatolian Fault Zone from SAR, GNSS and strong motion data of the 2023 Türkiye-Syria earthquake doublet.
Liu J; Huang C; Zhang G; Shan X; Korzhenkov A; Taymaz T
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10625. PubMed ID: 38724632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Months-long seismicity transients preceding the 2023 M
Kwiatek G; Martínez-Garzón P; Becker D; Dresen G; Cotton F; Beroza GC; Acarel D; Ergintav S; Bohnhoff M
Nat Commun; 2023 Nov; 14(1):7534. PubMed ID: 38016987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-resolution co-seismic fault offsets of the 2023 Türkiye earthquake ruptures using satellite imagery.
Provost F; Karabacak V; Malet JP; Van der Woerd J; Meghraoui M; Masson F; Ferry M; Michéa D; Pointal E
Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6834. PubMed ID: 38514658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bridging time scales of faulting: From coseismic to postseismic slip of the
Premus J; Gallovič F; Ampuero JP
Sci Adv; 2022 Sep; 8(38):eabq2536. PubMed ID: 36149958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complex multifault rupture during the 2016
Hamling IJ; Hreinsdóttir S; Clark K; Elliott J; Liang C; Fielding E; Litchfield N; Villamor P; Wallace L; Wright TJ; D'Anastasio E; Bannister S; Burbidge D; Denys P; Gentle P; Howarth J; Mueller C; Palmer N; Pearson C; Power W; Barnes P; Barrell DJ; Van Dissen R; Langridge R; Little T; Nicol A; Pettinga J; Rowland J; Stirling M
Science; 2017 Apr; 356(6334):. PubMed ID: 28336563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic viability of the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake cascade on weak crustal faults.
Ulrich T; Gabriel AA; Ampuero JP; Xu W
Nat Commun; 2019 Mar; 10(1):1213. PubMed ID: 30872591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Slow rupture in a fluid-rich fault zone initiated the 2024
Ma Z; Zeng H; Luo H; Liu Z; Jiang Y; Aoki Y; Wang W; Itoh Y; Lyu M; Cui Y; Yun SH; Hill EM; Wei S
Science; 2024 Jul; ():eado5143. PubMed ID: 38963875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A New Perspective on Fault Geometry and Slip Distribution of the 2009 Dachaidan Mw 6.3 Earthquake from InSAR Observations.
Liu Y; Xu C; Wen Y; Fok HS
Sensors (Basel); 2015 Jul; 15(7):16786-803. PubMed ID: 26184210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Potential domino effect of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake on the centuries-long seismic quiescence of the Dead Sea fault: inferences from the North Anatolian fault.
Altunel E; Kozacı Ö; Yıldırım C; Sbeinati RM; Meghraoui M
Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):15440. PubMed ID: 38965261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The preparatory process of the 2023 Mw 7.8 Türkiye earthquake.
Picozzi M; Iaccarino AG; Spallarossa D
Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):17853. PubMed ID: 37857660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Updated concepts of seismic gaps and asperities to assess great earthquake hazard along South America.
Lay T; Nishenko SP
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Dec; 119(51):e2216843119. PubMed ID: 36512498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Earthquake dynamics. Supershear rupture in a M(w) 6.7 aftershock of the 2013 Sea of Okhotsk earthquake.
Zhan Z; Helmberger DV; Kanamori H; Shearer PM
Science; 2014 Jul; 345(6193):204-7. PubMed ID: 25013073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D Co-Seismic Surface Displacements Measured by DInSAR and MAI of the 2017 Sarpol Zahab Earthquake, Mw7.3.
Ali R; Wu X; Chen Q; Elubid BA; Dafalla DS; Kamran M; Aldoud AA
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(16):. PubMed ID: 36011467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Resolving Fine-Scale Heterogeneity of Co-seismic Slip and the Relation to Fault Structure.
Milliner CW; Sammis C; Allam AA; Dolan JF; Hollingsworth J; Leprince S; Ayoub F
Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27201. PubMed ID: 27256901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surface deformations of the 6 February 2023 earthquake sequence, eastern Türkiye.
Meng J; Kusky T; Mooney WD; Bozkurt E; Bodur MN; Wang L
Science; 2024 Jan; 383(6680):298-305. PubMed ID: 38236960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Structural control on the Tohoku earthquake rupture process investigated by 3D FEM, tsunami and geodetic data.
Romano F; Trasatti E; Lorito S; Piromallo C; Piatanesi A; Ito Y; Zhao D; Hirata K; Lanucara P; Cocco M
Sci Rep; 2014 Jul; 4():5631. PubMed ID: 25005351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
