192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37536194)
1. Difference in the outcomes of anterior tenting and wrapping techniques for acellular dermal matrix coverage in prepectoral breast reconstruction.
Sohn SM; Lee HC; Park SH; Yoon ES
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Oct; 85():266-275. PubMed ID: 37536194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete anterior implant coverage using a single, large, square-shaped acellular dermal matrix.
Hong HK; Kim YH; Lee JS; Lee J; Park HY; Yang JD
BMC Surg; 2022 Jun; 22(1):234. PubMed ID: 35718764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impact of Premastectomy Versus Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on Outcomes in Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Sinnott CJ; Pronovost MT; Persing SM; Wu R; Young AO
Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jul; 87(1s Suppl 1):S21-S27. PubMed ID: 33833185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aesthetic Limitations in Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Safran T; Al-Badarin F; Al-Halabi B; Viezel-Mathieu A; Dionisopoulos T
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jul; 150(1):22e-31e. PubMed ID: 35499675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of clinical outcomes of acellular dermal matrix with and without radiation sterilization process in immediate prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.
Han WY; Han SJ; Kim EK; Han HH; Eom JS
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Dec; 87():461-466. PubMed ID: 37944457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes after tissue expander exchange to implant in two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix: A retrospective cohort study.
Marquez JL; French M; Ormiston L; Pires G; Martheswaran T; Eddington D; Tuncer F; Agarwal JP; Kwok AC
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Feb; 89():97-104. PubMed ID: 38160591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 3-Year Review.
Poveromo LP; Franck P; Ellison A; Janhofer DE; Asadourian PA; Otterburn DM
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 May; 88(3 Suppl 3):S205-S208. PubMed ID: 35513321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions.
Gabriel A; Sigalove S; Sigalove NM; Storm-Dickerson TL; Rice J; Pope N; Maxwell GP
Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Apr; 38(5):519-526. PubMed ID: 29365064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Human, Porcine, and Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.
Pires GR; Moss WD; Hosein RC; Overschmidt BT; Magno-Padron DA; Agarwal JP; McFarland MM; Casucci T; Kwok AC
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Dec; 89(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 36416706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of Dermal Matrix Brand in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Outcomes.
Johnson AC; Colakoglu S; Siddikoglu D; Li A; Kaoutzanis C; Cohen JB; Chong TW; Mathes DW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jul; 150(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 35499525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Algorithmic Approach to Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Version 2.0.
Antony AK; Robinson EC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 May; 143(5):1311-1319. PubMed ID: 31033812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct-to-Implant, Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Surgeon Experience with 201 Consecutive Patients.
Safran T; Al-Halabi B; Viezel-Mathieu A; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Apr; 145(4):686e-696e. PubMed ID: 32221195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the Safety of a GalaFLEX-AlloDerm Construct in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Sigalove S; O'Rorke E; Maxwell GP; Gabriel A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Oct; 150():75S-81S. PubMed ID: 35943912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do we need acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral breast reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nolan IT; Farajzadeh MM; Boyd CJ; Bekisz JM; Gibson EG; Salibian AA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Nov; 86():251-260. PubMed ID: 37793198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Sinnott CJ; Persing SM; Pronovost M; Hodyl C; McConnell D; Ott Young A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 25(10):2899-2908. PubMed ID: 29978367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted breast reconstruction using the prepectoral anterior tenting method.
Jeon DN; Kim J; Ko BS; Lee SB; Kim EK; Eom JS; Han HH
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Nov; 74(11):2906-2915. PubMed ID: 34023241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix-Based Breast Reconstruction in Previously Irradiated Breasts: Complications and Outcomes From a Single-Center Experience.
Lisa A; Carbonaro R; Bottoni M; Ostapenko E; Rietjens M
Ann Plast Surg; 2023 Dec; 91(6):686-692. PubMed ID: 37624913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety Profile and Predictors of Aesthetic Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Belmonte BM; Campbell CA
Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jun; 86(6S Suppl 5):S585-S592. PubMed ID: 34100818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
