These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37536504)

  • 1. Poor handling of continuous predictors in clinical prediction models using logistic regression: a systematic review.
    Ma J; Dhiman P; Qi C; Bullock G; van Smeden M; Riley RD; Collins GS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Sep; 161():140-151. PubMed ID: 37536504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying the impact of different approaches for handling continuous predictors on the performance of a prognostic model.
    Collins GS; Ogundimu EO; Cook JA; Manach YL; Altman DG
    Stat Med; 2016 Oct; 35(23):4124-35. PubMed ID: 27193918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developing risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of methodology and reporting.
    Collins GS; Mallett S; Omar O; Yu LM
    BMC Med; 2011 Sep; 9():103. PubMed ID: 21902820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review.
    Dhiman P; Ma J; Andaur Navarro CL; Speich B; Bullock G; Damen JAA; Hooft L; Kirtley S; Riley RD; Van Calster B; Moons KGM; Collins GS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):101. PubMed ID: 35395724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Missing data is poorly handled and reported in prediction model studies using machine learning: a literature review.
    Nijman S; Leeuwenberg AM; Beekers I; Verkouter I; Jacobs J; Bots ML; Asselbergs FW; Moons K; Debray T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Feb; 142():218-229. PubMed ID: 34798287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Building multivariable regression models with continuous covariates in clinical epidemiology--with an emphasis on fractional polynomials.
    Royston P; Sauerbrei W
    Methods Inf Med; 2005; 44(4):561-71. PubMed ID: 16342923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical Prediction Models and Predictors for Death or Adverse Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Term Newborns with Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
    Langeslag JF; Berendse K; Daams JG; Onland W; Leeflang MMG; van Kaam AH; de Haan TR
    Neonatology; 2023; 120(6):776-788. PubMed ID: 37536297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation of statistical methods used in prognostic prediction models for obstetric care: A 10 year-span cross-sectional study.
    Tan J; Liu C; Yang M; Xiong Y; Huang S; Qi Y; Chen M; Thabane L; Liu X; He L; Sun X
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Mar; 103(3):611-620. PubMed ID: 38140844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.
    Vernooij LM; van Klei WA; Moons KG; Takada T; van Waes J; Damen JA
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Dec; 12(12):CD013139. PubMed ID: 34931303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developing a Clinical Prediction Score: Comparing Prediction Accuracy of Integer Scores to Statistical Regression Models.
    Subramanian V; Mascha EJ; Kattan MW
    Anesth Analg; 2021 Jun; 132(6):1603-1613. PubMed ID: 33464759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of transition to psychosis in patients with a clinical high risk for psychosis: a systematic review of methodology and reporting.
    Studerus E; Ramyead A; Riecher-Rössler A
    Psychol Med; 2017 May; 47(7):1163-1178. PubMed ID: 28091343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imputation and missing indicators for handling missing data in the development and deployment of clinical prediction models: A simulation study.
    Sisk R; Sperrin M; Peek N; van Smeden M; Martin GP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Aug; 32(8):1461-1477. PubMed ID: 37105540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of first trimester risk prediction models for pre-eclampsia: a systematic review.
    Brunelli VB; Prefumo F
    BJOG; 2015 Jun; 122(7):904-14. PubMed ID: 25761437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonlinear modeling was applied thoughtfully for risk prediction: the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.
    Nieboer D; Vergouwe Y; Roobol MJ; Ankerst DP; Kattan MW; Vickers AJ; Steyerberg EW;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 68(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 25777297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic models for identifying risk of poor outcome in people with acute ankle sprains: the SPRAINED development and external validation study.
    Keene DJ; Schlüssel MM; Thompson J; Hagan DA; Williams MA; Byrne C; Goodacre S; Cooke M; Gwilym S; Hormbrey P; Bostock J; Haywood K; Wilson D; Collins GS; Lamb SE
    Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(64):1-112. PubMed ID: 30474592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size requirements are not being considered in studies developing prediction models for binary outcomes: a systematic review.
    Dhiman P; Ma J; Qi C; Bullock G; Sergeant JC; Riley RD; Collins GS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Aug; 23(1):188. PubMed ID: 37598153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A systematic review of the quality of clinical prediction models in in vitro fertilisation.
    Ratna MB; Bhattacharya S; Abdulrahim B; McLernon DJ
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Jan; 35(1):100-116. PubMed ID: 31960915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation and development of models using clinical, biochemical and ultrasound markers for predicting pre-eclampsia: an individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Allotey J; Snell KI; Smuk M; Hooper R; Chan CL; Ahmed A; Chappell LC; von Dadelszen P; Dodds J; Green M; Kenny L; Khalil A; Khan KS; Mol BW; Myers J; Poston L; Thilaganathan B; Staff AC; Smith GC; Ganzevoort W; Laivuori H; Odibo AO; Ramírez JA; Kingdom J; Daskalakis G; Farrar D; Baschat AA; Seed PT; Prefumo F; da Silva Costa F; Groen H; Audibert F; Masse J; Skråstad RB; Salvesen KÅ; Haavaldsen C; Nagata C; Rumbold AR; Heinonen S; Askie LM; Smits LJ; Vinter CA; Magnus PM; Eero K; Villa PM; Jenum AK; Andersen LB; Norman JE; Ohkuchi A; Eskild A; Bhattacharya S; McAuliffe FM; Galindo A; Herraiz I; Carbillon L; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Yeo S; Teede HJ; Browne JL; Moons KG; Riley RD; Thangaratinam S
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Dec; 24(72):1-252. PubMed ID: 33336645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endorsement of the TRIPOD statement and the reporting of studies developing contrast-induced nephropathy prediction models for the coronary angiography/percutaneous coronary intervention population: a cross-sectional study.
    Miao S; Pan C; Li D; Shen S; Wen A
    BMJ Open; 2022 Feb; 12(2):e052568. PubMed ID: 35190425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.