133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37537977)
1. Clinical efficacy and risk factors for suction curettage and hysteroscopy in patients with type I and II cesarean scar pregnancy.
Wu T; Wang Q; Liu W; Zhang J; Wang W; Wang J; Ji C; Liu H; Tang C; Mi X
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Jan; 164(1):270-276. PubMed ID: 37537977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy.
Long Y; Zhu H; Hu Y; Shen L; Fu J; Huang W
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jul; 7(7):CD011174. PubMed ID: 32609376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effectiveness of hysteroscopy for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.
You X; Ruan Y; Weng S; Lin C; Gan M; Qi F
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2024 Feb; 24(1):151. PubMed ID: 38383385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Efficacy of Combined Hysteroscopic and Laparoscopic Surgery and Reversible Ligation of the Uterine Artery for Excision and Repair of Uterine Scar in Patients with Type II and III Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.
Huang L; Zhao L; Shi H
Med Sci Monit; 2020 Jun; 26():e924076. PubMed ID: 32595205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy vs. uterine curettage in the uterine artery embolization-based management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.
He Y; Wu X; Zhu Q; Wu X; Feng L; Wu X; Zhao A; Di W
BMC Womens Health; 2014 Sep; 14():116. PubMed ID: 25248928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison between laparoscopy and hysteroscopy approach in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Zhang X; Pang Y; Ma Y; Liu X; Cheng L; Ban Y; Cui B
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Oct; 99(43):e22845. PubMed ID: 33120815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Curettage or operative hysteroscopy in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Qian ZD; Huang LL; Zhu XM
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Nov; 292(5):1055-61. PubMed ID: 25935196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Chen L; Xiao S; Zhu X; He S; Xue M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):883-890. PubMed ID: 30205163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hysteroscopic treatment and reproductive outcomes in cesarean scar pregnancy: experience at a single institution.
Tang Q; Qin Y; Zhou Q; Tang J; Zhou Q; Qiao J; Shu C; Dai X; Zhang J
Fertil Steril; 2021 Dec; 116(6):1559-1566. PubMed ID: 34301391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing the clinical efficacy of three surgical methods for cesarean scar pregnancy.
Zeng S; Wang Y; Ye P; Xu L; Han W; Li F; Tang C; Zhou J; Xie X
BMC Womens Health; 2023 May; 23(1):271. PubMed ID: 37198658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of suction curettage as the first-line treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective study.
Cetin F; Kayar İ; Serin AN; Birge Ö
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Feb; 52(2):102531. PubMed ID: 36592889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of collateral embolization in addition to uterine artery embolization followed by hysteroscopic curettage for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Zhang G; Li J; Tang J; Zhang L; Wang D; Sun Z
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Dec; 19(1):502. PubMed ID: 31842804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization in the treatment and management of cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective study.
Hong Y; Guo Q; Pu Y; Lu D; Hu M
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jul; 96(30):e7687. PubMed ID: 28746234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The value of hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a report of 44 cases.
Pan Y; Liu MB
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 56(2):139-142. PubMed ID: 28420496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Management of cesarean scar pregnancy by hysteroscopy combined with uterine artery embolism].
Chen ZY; Zhang XM; Xu H; Zhang J; Huang XF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 46(8):591-4. PubMed ID: 22169517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Management of persistent caesarean scar pregnancy after curettage treatment failure.
Qian ZD; Weng Y; Du YJ; Wang CF; Huang LL
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):208. PubMed ID: 28666477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of D&C and hysteroscopy after UAE in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: A case-control study.
Cao L; Qian Z; Huang L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Jan; 101(3):e28607. PubMed ID: 35060530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Focused Ultrasound Ablation Surgery combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage in the treatment and management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.
Yuan Y; Pu D; Zhan P; Zheng Y; Ren Q; Teichmann AT
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Mar; 258():168-173. PubMed ID: 33444810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Curettage With and Without Uterine Artery Embolization on Controlling Intraoperative Blood Loss for a Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treatment: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Tang Y; Zhang Y; Tang H; Che J; Feng H; Yao X; Chen Q
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():651273. PubMed ID: 34194390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exogenous cesarean scar pregnancies managed by suction curettage alone or in combination with other therapeutic procedures: A series of 33 cases and analysis of complication profile.
Özdamar Ö; Doğer E; Arlıer S; Çakıroğlu Y; Ergin RN; Köpük ŞY; Çalışkan E
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Aug; 42(8):927-35. PubMed ID: 27125570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
