These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37538816)

  • 21. Machine learning optimization of cross docking accuracy.
    Bjerrum EJ
    Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Jun; 62():133-44. PubMed ID: 27179709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. DENVIS: Scalable and High-Throughput Virtual Screening Using Graph Neural Networks with Atomic and Surface Protein Pocket Features.
    Krasoulis A; Antonopoulos N; Pitsikalis V; Theodorakis S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Oct; 62(19):4642-4659. PubMed ID: 36154119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improving protein-ligand docking and screening accuracies by incorporating a scoring function correction term.
    Zheng L; Meng J; Jiang K; Lan H; Wang Z; Lin M; Li W; Guo H; Wei Y; Mu Y
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 May; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 35289359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A knowledge-guided strategy for improving the accuracy of scoring functions in binding affinity prediction.
    Cheng T; Liu Z; Wang R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Apr; 11():193. PubMed ID: 20398404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An Overview of Scoring Functions Used for Protein-Ligand Interactions in Molecular Docking.
    Li J; Fu A; Zhang L
    Interdiscip Sci; 2019 Jun; 11(2):320-328. PubMed ID: 30877639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Binding Affinity for Drug Targets: A Study of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2.
    Bitencourt-Ferreira G; Duarte da Silva A; Filgueira de Azevedo W
    Curr Med Chem; 2021; 28(2):253-265. PubMed ID: 31729287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Docking and Scoring with Target-Specific Pose Classifier Succeeds in Native-Like Pose Identification But Not Binding Affinity Prediction in the CSAR 2014 Benchmark Exercise.
    Politi R; Convertino M; Popov K; Dokholyan NV; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1032-41. PubMed ID: 27050767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Combination of pose and rank consensus in docking-based virtual screening: the best of both worlds.
    Scardino V; Bollini M; Cavasotto CN
    RSC Adv; 2021 Oct; 11(56):35383-35391. PubMed ID: 35424265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Hybrid Docking and Machine Learning Approach to Enhance the Performance of Virtual Screening Carried out on Protein-Protein Interfaces.
    Singh N; Villoutreix BO
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Nov; 23(22):. PubMed ID: 36430841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Forging the Basis for Developing Protein-Ligand Interaction Scoring Functions.
    Liu Z; Su M; Han L; Liu J; Yang Q; Li Y; Wang R
    Acc Chem Res; 2017 Feb; 50(2):302-309. PubMed ID: 28182403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
    Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Calculating an optimal box size for ligand docking and virtual screening against experimental and predicted binding pockets.
    Feinstein WP; Brylinski M
    J Cheminform; 2015; 7():18. PubMed ID: 26082804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A fully differentiable ligand pose optimization framework guided by deep learning and a traditional scoring function.
    Wang Z; Zheng L; Wang S; Lin M; Wang Z; Kong AW; Mu Y; Wei Y; Li W
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 36502369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Deep neural network affinity model for BACE inhibitors in D3R Grand Challenge 4.
    Wang B; Ng HL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Feb; 34(2):201-217. PubMed ID: 31916049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Data Mining Meets Machine Learning: A Novel ANN-based Multi-body Interaction Docking Scoring Function (MBI-score) Based on Utilizing Frequent Geometric and Chemical Patterns of Interfacial Atoms in Native Protein-ligand Complexes.
    Khashan R; Tropsha A; Zheng W
    Mol Inform; 2022 Aug; 41(8):e2100248. PubMed ID: 35142086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. XLPFE: A Simple and Effective Machine Learning Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Scoring and Ranking.
    Dong L; Qu X; Wang B
    ACS Omega; 2022 Jun; 7(25):21727-21735. PubMed ID: 35785279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Consensus scoring criteria for improving enrichment in virtual screening.
    Yang JM; Chen YF; Shen TW; Kristal BS; Hsu DF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):1134-46. PubMed ID: 16045308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Water Network-Augmented Two-State Model for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
    Qu X; Dong L; Luo D; Si Y; Wang B
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Apr; 64(7):2263-2274. PubMed ID: 37433009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Deep Scoring Neural Network Replacing the Scoring Function Components to Improve the Performance of Structure-Based Molecular Docking.
    Yang L; Yang G; Chen X; Yang Q; Yao X; Bing Z; Niu Y; Huang L; Yang L
    ACS Chem Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 12(12):2133-2142. PubMed ID: 34081851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The CASP13-CAPRI targets as case studies to illustrate a novel scoring pipeline integrating CONSRANK with clustering and interface analyses.
    Barradas-Bautista D; Cao Z; Cavallo L; Oliva R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Sep; 21(Suppl 8):262. PubMed ID: 32938371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.